November 2011 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Nov 1 00:55:12 PDT 2011
Ending: Wed Nov 30 12:20:36 PST 2011
Messages: 413

• [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system   Michael Allan
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Michael Allan
• [EM] IRV variants   Chris Benham
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   Chris Benham
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   Chris Benham
• [EM] An ABE solution   Chris Benham
• [EM] ] An ABE solution   Chris Benham
• [EM] An ABE solution   Chris Benham
• [EM] An ABE solution   Chris Benham
• [EM] An ABE solution   Chris Benham
• [EM] An ABE solution   Chris Benham
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send)   Chris Benham
• [EM] ER-IRV(whole) fails FBC (was "no subject")   C.Benham
• [EM] Tentative replacement for CD   C.Benham
• [EM] IRV variants   C.Benham
• [EM] MDD,ER-Bucklin(whole) fails Mono-add-Plump   C.Benham
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   C.Benham
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   C.Benham
• [EM] Criterion-compliance table. Method merit order. Polling and proposing methods.   C.Benham
• [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.   C.Benham
• [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.   C.Benham
• [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.   C.Benham
• [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   C.Benham
• [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.   C.Benham
• [EM] Descending Acquiescing Coalitions versus Nested Acquiescing Coalitions   C.Benham
• [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example   C.Benham
• [EM] An ABE solution   C.Benham
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   C.Benham
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   C.Benham
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   C.Benham
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   C.Benham
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   C.Benham
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Fwd: Ranked Choice Voting a Clear Winner in St. Paul Elections   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting systemElection-Methods Digest, Vol 89, Issue 43   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] PR election results   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] State's top-two runoff system under legal fire by political parties   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] IRV variants   Richard Fobes
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Richard Fobes
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation.   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas   James Gilmour
• [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] non-transitive ranked pairs   Ross Hyman
• [EM] non-transitive ranked pairs   Ross Hyman
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Ross Hyman
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Ross Hyman
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Ross Hyman
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Ross Hyman
• [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form   Ross Hyman
• [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form   Ross Hyman
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Andy Jennings
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Andy Jennings
• [EM] IRV variant   Andy Jennings
• [EM] Electoral Pluralism   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Electoral Pluralism   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Burlington manifesto - for Condorcet   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO bad-example   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] hello from DLW of "A New Kind of Party":long timeelectoral reform enthusiast/iconoclast-wannabe...   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Interactive Representation   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Interactive Representation   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Interactive Representation   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Interactive Representation   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   Juho Laatu
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   Juho Laatu
• [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.   Clinton Mead
• [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.   Clinton Mead
• [EM] hello from DLW of "A New Kind of Party":long time electoral reform enthusiast/iconoclast-wannabe...   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] a response to Andy J.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Interactive Representation   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More re: to Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrt Fuzzy Options.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Burlington manifesto   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-ratred from middle-rated. 3-Slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 utility example.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-rated from middle-rated. 3-slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 example.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare avoids the pit-falls of most ordered party-list elections.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] An ABE solution   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] An ABE solution   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re to KM wrt 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare and Loring Ensemble Rule.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Robert Bristow-Johnson   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re to Kristof M   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Almost-realtime Yee diagrams on the GPU   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Results of poll for favorite multi-winner voting system   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] PR election results   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] PR election results   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] (no subject)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More about some 3P methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO and FBC. Votes-only criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] (no subject)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tentative replacement for CD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] UP is MMC+(=whole). Use of protection-levels. SDSC, SFC.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ER-IRV(whole) fails FBC (was "no subject")   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tentative replacement for CD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to a few IRV arguments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] reply to a reply to IRV args by Mike Ossipoff   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 1CM criterion, better definition. MTA method.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typos fixed: 1CM, better definition. MTA method.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV variant   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV Variant   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV variant   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Methods reduce to Approval?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV Variant   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval bad example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better and simpler SFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criterion-compliance table. Method merit order. Polling and proposing methods.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better 3P & UP definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mon-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] This Message didn't post properly, and I'm re-trying it. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump reply.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MCA strategy. MCA vs MTA?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-ratred from middle-rated. 3-Slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 utility example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-rated from middle-rated. 3-slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Replies to two postings from Jameson Quinn   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Largest-Remainder doesn't favor small parties, but isn't very proportional either. PR is obsolete now that Proxy DD is available.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] An ABE solution.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin: Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin's other posting on votes-only criteria vs preference criteria.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] David Wetzel, re:   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A completely general definition of voting x over y.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Continuation of reply to David Wetzel   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO bad-example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Refinements to definition of voting x over y   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mutual Majority Top (MMT)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Two typos in previous posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] An ABE solution   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on MMT & MTAOC. Much improved revised MTAOC.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Forrest--ABC & FBC passing methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Small omission in MTAOC program   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ted: Voting system properties   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] non-transitive ranked pairs   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] (no subject)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Strategy and Bayesian Regret   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Tentative replacement for CD   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] a response to JQ on IRV3/AV3   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV variants   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV variants   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Burlington manifesto   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV variant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Burlington manifesto   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV Variant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV variant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV variant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: Ranked Choice Voting a Clear Winner in St. Paul Elections   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Critical part of Re:Kristofer Munsterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Replies to two postings from Jameson Quinn   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Replies to two postings from Jameson Quinn   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO bad-example   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] PR election results   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] ] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re : An ABE solution   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Does High Resolution Range offer a solution to the ABE?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] Electorama/wiki   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] Kevin's other posting on votes-only criteria vs preference criteria.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Saharon Shelah with own version of Arrow Theorem... I wonder what it is?   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to a reply to IRV args by Mike Ossipoff   Ted Stern
• [EM] IRV variants   Ted Stern
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   Ted Stern
• [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem.   Ted Stern
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send)   Ted Stern
• [EM] Strategy and Bayesian Regret   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] (no subject)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : (no subject)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic]   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : An ABE solution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : An ABE solution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : An ABE solution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : An ABE solution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] An ABE solution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re : An ABE solution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   David L Wetzell
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   David L Wetzell
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 89, Issue 7   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] a response to JQ on IRV3/AV3   David L Wetzell
• [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] reply to a reply to IRV args by Mike Ossipoff   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re to Mike O.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More re: to Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrt Fuzzy Options.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] My thoughts wrt SODA   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Electoral Pluralism   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Electoral Pluralism   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: Ranked Choice Voting a Clear Winner in St. Paul Elections   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare avoids the pit-falls of most ordered party-list elections.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Critical part of Re:Kristofer Munsterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re to Mike O wrt 3 seat LR Hare.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re to KM wrt 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare andLoring Ensemble Rule.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Mike O. and others wrt 3 seat LR Hare   David L Wetzell
• [EM] My blog review of ERS's e-Pamphlet against PR myths   David L Wetzell
• [EM] PR election results   David L Wetzell
• [EM] PR election results   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Robert Bristow-Johnson   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re to Kristof M   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re to Kristof M   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas   Peter Zbornik
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas   Peter Zbornik
• [EM] IRV variant   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] IRV variant   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] IRV variant   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Dealing with people making malformed low-information posts and the offending posters (Was [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic])   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Election Day causes stress   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] ... wrt Burlington et al.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Interactive Representation   capologist
• [EM] Interactive Representation   capologist
• [EM] Interactive Representation   capologist
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 89, Issue 27   capologist
• [EM] Interactive Representation   capologist
• [EM] IRV variants   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] IRV variants   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Approval Bad Example   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Descending Acquiescing Coalitions versus Nested Acquiescing Coalitions   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Three Slot Methods   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] An ABE solution.   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] An ABE solution   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] An ABE solution   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] An ABE solution   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] An ABE solution   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem.   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMPO ideas   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Does High Resolution Range offer a solution to the ABE?   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   matt welland
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   matt welland
• [EM] [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic]   ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• [EM] Dealing with people making malformed low-information posts and the offending posters (Was [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic])   ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• [EM] Public Apology   ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• [EM] Favorite multi-winner voting system   ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system   ⸘Ŭalabio‽

Last message date: Wed Nov 30 12:20:36 PST 2011
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:35:27 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...