November 2011 Archives by author
Starting: Tue Nov 1 00:55:12 PDT 2011
Ending: Wed Nov 30 12:20:36 PST 2011
Messages: 413
- [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system
Michael Allan
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Michael Allan
- [EM] IRV variants
Chris Benham
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
Chris Benham
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
Chris Benham
- [EM] An ABE solution
Chris Benham
- [EM] ] An ABE solution
Chris Benham
- [EM] An ABE solution
Chris Benham
- [EM] An ABE solution
Chris Benham
- [EM] An ABE solution
Chris Benham
- [EM] An ABE solution
Chris Benham
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send)
Chris Benham
- [EM] ER-IRV(whole) fails FBC (was "no subject")
C.Benham
- [EM] Tentative replacement for CD
C.Benham
- [EM] IRV variants
C.Benham
- [EM] MDD,ER-Bucklin(whole) fails Mono-add-Plump
C.Benham
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
C.Benham
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
C.Benham
- [EM] Criterion-compliance table. Method merit order. Polling and proposing methods.
C.Benham
- [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.
C.Benham
- [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.
C.Benham
- [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.
C.Benham
- [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
C.Benham
- [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.
C.Benham
- [EM] Descending Acquiescing Coalitions versus Nested Acquiescing Coalitions
C.Benham
- [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example
C.Benham
- [EM] An ABE solution
C.Benham
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
C.Benham
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
C.Benham
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
C.Benham
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
C.Benham
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
C.Benham
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Fwd: Ranked Choice Voting a Clear Winner in St. Paul Elections
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting systemElection-Methods Digest, Vol 89, Issue 43
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] PR election results
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] State's top-two runoff system under legal fire by political parties
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] IRV variants
Richard Fobes
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Richard Fobes
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Richard Fobes
- [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation.
Raph Frank
- [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
James Gilmour
- [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] non-transitive ranked pairs
Ross Hyman
- [EM] non-transitive ranked pairs
Ross Hyman
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Ross Hyman
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Ross Hyman
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Ross Hyman
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Ross Hyman
- [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form
Ross Hyman
- [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form
Ross Hyman
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Andy Jennings
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Andy Jennings
- [EM] IRV variant
Andy Jennings
- [EM] Electoral Pluralism
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Electoral Pluralism
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Burlington manifesto - for Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Kristofer: MMPO bad-example
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] hello from DLW of "A New Kind of Party":long timeelectoral reform enthusiast/iconoclast-wannabe...
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Interactive Representation
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Interactive Representation
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Interactive Representation
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Interactive Representation
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
Juho Laatu
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV
Juho Laatu
- [EM] A design flaw in the electoral system
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Clinton Mead
- [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Clinton Mead
- [EM] hello from DLW of "A New Kind of Party":long time electoral reform enthusiast/iconoclast-wannabe...
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] a response to Andy J.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Interactive Representation
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More re: to Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrt Fuzzy Options.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Burlington manifesto
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-ratred from middle-rated. 3-Slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 utility example.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-rated from middle-rated. 3-slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 example.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare avoids the pit-falls of most ordered party-list elections.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] An ABE solution
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] An ABE solution
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Re to KM wrt 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare and Loring Ensemble Rule.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Robert Bristow-Johnson
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Re to Kristof M
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Almost-realtime Yee diagrams on the GPU
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system
Jeffrey O'Neill
- [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system
Jeffrey O'Neill
- [EM] Results of poll for favorite multi-winner voting system
Jeffrey O'Neill
- [EM] PR election results
Jeffrey O'Neill
- [EM] PR election results
Jeffrey O'Neill
- [EM] (no subject)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] More about some 3P methods
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] MMPO and FBC. Votes-only criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] (no subject)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Tentative replacement for CD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] UP is MMC+(=whole). Use of protection-levels. SDSC, SFC.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] ER-IRV(whole) fails FBC (was "no subject")
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Tentative replacement for CD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Reply to a few IRV arguments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] reply to a reply to IRV args by Mike Ossipoff
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] 1CM criterion, better definition. MTA method.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Typos fixed: 1CM, better definition. MTA method.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] IRV variant
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] IRV Variant
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] IRV variant
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Methods reduce to Approval?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] IRV Variant
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Approval bad example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Better and simpler SFC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Criterion-compliance table. Method merit order. Polling and proposing methods.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Better 3P & UP definitions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mon-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] ABucklin doesn't meet Mono-Add-Top or Participation, but meets Mono-Add-Plump. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] This Message didn't post properly, and I'm re-trying it. MDDTR and Mono-Add-Plump reply.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] MCA strategy. MCA vs MTA?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-ratred from middle-rated. 3-Slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 utility example.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Addenda: Who is wronged in MMPO bad-example? MCA protection of top-rated from middle-rated. 3-slot SFC. The 100, 15, 0 example.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Replies to two postings from Jameson Quinn
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Largest-Remainder doesn't favor small parties, but isn't very proportional either. PR is obsolete now that Proxy DD is available.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] An ABE solution.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin: Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin's other posting on votes-only criteria vs preference criteria.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] David Wetzel, re:
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] A completely general definition of voting x over y.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Continuation of reply to David Wetzel
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kristofer: MMPO bad-example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Refinements to definition of voting x over y
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Mutual Majority Top (MMT)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Two typos in previous posting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] An ABE solution
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Comments on MMT & MTAOC. Much improved revised MTAOC.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Forrest--ABC & FBC passing methods
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Approval vs IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Small omission in MTAOC program
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Ted: Voting system properties
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] non-transitive ranked pairs
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] (no subject)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Strategy and Bayesian Regret
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Tentative replacement for CD
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] a response to JQ on IRV3/AV3
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV variants
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV variants
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Burlington manifesto
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV variant
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Burlington manifesto
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV Variant
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV variant
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] IRV variant
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Fwd: Ranked Choice Voting a Clear Winner in St. Paul Elections
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Critical part of Re:Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Replies to two postings from Jameson Quinn
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Replies to two postings from Jameson Quinn
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Reply to Chris regarding the Approval bad-example
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Kristofer: MMPO bad-example
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] PR election results
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] ] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Re : An ABE solution
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Does High Resolution Range offer a solution to the ABE?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] Could a single specially-crafted new vote resolve all ties in a Shulze election?
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] Electorama/wiki
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] Kevin's other posting on votes-only criteria vs preference criteria.
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.
Markus Schulze
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Markus Schulze
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Markus Schulze
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Markus Schulze
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Saharon Shelah with own version of Arrow Theorem... I wonder what it is?
Warren Smith
- [EM] reply to a reply to IRV args by Mike Ossipoff
Ted Stern
- [EM] IRV variants
Ted Stern
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
Ted Stern
- [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem.
Ted Stern
- [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send)
Ted Stern
- [EM] Strategy and Bayesian Regret
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] (no subject)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : (no subject)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic]
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : Re : Toy election model: 2D IQ (ideology/quality) model
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : An ABE solution
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : An ABE solution
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : An ABE solution
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : An ABE solution
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] An ABE solution
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re : An ABE solution
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
David L Wetzell
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
David L Wetzell
- [EM] IRV3/AV3
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 89, Issue 7
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] a response to JQ on IRV3/AV3
David L Wetzell
- [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] a response to Kristofer Munsterhjelm re: Fuzzy Options.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] reply to a reply to IRV args by Mike Ossipoff
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Re to Mike O.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More re: to Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrt Fuzzy Options.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] My thoughts wrt SODA
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Response to Kristofer Musterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Electoral Pluralism
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Electoral Pluralism
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Fwd: Ranked Choice Voting a Clear Winner in St. Paul Elections
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare avoids the pit-falls of most ordered party-list elections.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Critical part of Re:Kristofer Munsterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] JamesonQ, wrt critical part of re: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Re to Mike O wrt 3 seat LR Hare.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Re to KM wrt 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare andLoring Ensemble Rule.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Mike O. and others wrt 3 seat LR Hare
David L Wetzell
- [EM] My blog review of ERS's e-Pamphlet against PR myths
David L Wetzell
- [EM] PR election results
David L Wetzell
- [EM] PR election results
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Robert Bristow-Johnson
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Re to Kristof M
David L Wetzell
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Re to Kristof M
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
Peter Zbornik
- [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
Peter Zbornik
- [EM] IRV variant
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] IRV variant
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] IRV variant
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] Dealing with people making malformed low-information posts and the offending posters (Was [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic])
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] Election Day causes stress
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] ... wrt Burlington et al.
robert bristow-johnson
- [EM] Interactive Representation
capologist
- [EM] Interactive Representation
capologist
- [EM] Interactive Representation
capologist
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 89, Issue 27
capologist
- [EM] Interactive Representation
capologist
- [EM] IRV variants
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] IRV variants
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Approval Bad Example
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Descending Acquiescing Coalitions versus Nested Acquiescing Coalitions
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Three Slot Methods
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] An ABE solution.
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] An ABE solution
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] An ABE solution
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MTA vs. MCA (was "An ABE solution")
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] An ABE solution
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] An ABE solution
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem.
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MMPO ideas
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Does High Resolution Range offer a solution to the ABE?
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
matt welland
- [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
matt welland
- [EM] [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic]
⸘Ŭalabio‽
- [EM] Dealing with people making malformed low-information posts and the offending posters (Was [Off Topic] Banning those Me-Tooing like brain-dead AOLers [/Off Topic])
⸘Ŭalabio‽
- [EM] Public Apology
⸘Ŭalabio‽
- [EM] Favorite multi-winner voting system
⸘Ŭalabio‽
- [EM] Poll for favorite multi-winner voting system
⸘Ŭalabio‽
Last message date:
Wed Nov 30 12:20:36 PST 2011
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:35:27 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).