[EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet at lavabit.com
Sun Nov 27 03:11:34 PST 2011
Peter Zbornik wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> do anyone of you know the best way to incorporate single constraints
> into STV and proportional rankings from STV (see for instance:
> http://www.votingmatters.org.uk/issue9/p5.htm)?
> For instance, the constraint can be that at least 1/3 of the elected
> seats go to candidates of each gender.
> I found some information in the links below, but I wonder if there are
> better or more recent suggestions:
> http://www.votingmatters.org.uk/ISSUE9/P1.HTM
> http://www.votingmatters.org.uk/issue9/p5.htm
I don't know of any better rules than the naive rule off the top of my
head. I will note this, however: if you use a combinatorial method like
Schulze STV, it is very easy to accommodate both simple and complex
rules. You just decide to consider only those seat compositions that are
permitted by the constraints.
For instance, if you need at least one black and at least one woman (but
they can be the same person), then you enumerate all possible
permutations and remove those that have no blacks and no women. Then you
run Schulze STV (or combinatorial method of choice) with respect to
what's left.
This also works for constraints that can't easily be determined in
advance or from the ballots themselves. If you say that the CW based on
the same ballots, or the current chairman's pick, has to be on the
council, first run the ballots through a Condorcet method (or ask the
chairman) and only consider the seat compositions where the candidate in
question is included.
I suppose you could make ordinary STV combinatorial by considering "how
many voters did we have to overrule to get the composition we wanted"
(where this is measured as number of last preferences for the candidate
that was eliminated in each round, less the number of last preferences
for the candidate that would have been eliminated by ordinary STV rules,
using a forced elimination sequence that minimizes this number for the
given composition), but it's not clear to me how you would go about
actually calculating that minimizing sequence.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list