[EM] Three Slot Methods
fsimmons at pcc.edu
fsimmons at pcc.edu
Wed Nov 16 13:16:18 PST 2011
I like Mike's discussion of three slot methods. I could live with any of his suggestions including 3 slot
MMPO, MTA, MCA, MDD,TR, etc.
Some other possibilities to consider:
I. In 3 slot MMPO take into account the magnitude of each ballot opposition as well as the number of
ballots with opposition; In this version a ballot that rates X two slots above Y contributes twice as much
opposition against Y by X as a ballot that rates X only one slot above Y.
Note that in this version the difference between the opposition of X against Y and the opposition of Y
against X turns out to be the same as the difference in their respective range scores.
II. Elect the candidate unrated on the fewest ballots. In case of a tie, elect the tied candidate with the
greatest number of top ratings.
Someone may object that the difference between top and middle only comes into play when there is a
tie. But remember that no matter the method, the only time your vote ever makes a difference is in
making or breaking a tie.
III. Smith//Range I'll talk more about this later. I used to like Smith//Approval better, but now I'm
starting to change my mind. There are descriptions of this method that do not require defining or
detecting the Smith set.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list