[EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional.

[Jameson Quinn]

There are other methods which you don't mention even though their
advantages are similar to those of the ones you do.

2011/11/25 MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp at hotmail.com>

>
> Regarding the co-operation/defection problem, there are about 4
> possibilities:
>
> 1. Just propose MTA and Keep the co-operation/defection problem.
>

Majority Judgment has similar advantages to MTA in this case. It has
slightly less of an incentive against truncation (bad) but also slightly
more expressivity and slightly less of an incentive for upwards
exaggeration (good). Also it's better-known than MTA.

2. Accept the potentially controversial nature of MMPO or MDDTR, caused by
> their
> perceived excessive departures from Plurality...and the resulting
> vulnerability to opponents
> creating a distraction about that.
>
> 3. Use a much more complicated method that meets FBC, Mono-Add-Plump,
> doesn't elect
> C in Kevin's MMPO bad-example, and doesn't have the co-operation/defection
> problem.
>
> 4. Find a simpler method that has those advantages.
>

Such as SODA.

Jameson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20111125/6c122db9/attachment-0004.htm>