[EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC.

[C.Benham]

Mike Ossipoff wrote (15 Nov 2011):

<snip>

> By the way, when people object to "random-fill incentive" for MDDTR, 
> maybe they're
> forgetting that MDDTR is a 3-slot method.
>  
> And, if MMPO were proposed as a 3-slot method, that would avoid the 
> "random-fill incentive"
> criticism of it too.
>

Mike, why do you think it will do that?  There's no reason why a 3-slot 
method can't have a random-fill
incentive. 

Chris Benham