[EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.

[Jameson Quinn]

>
>> If I've read you correctly here, it seems to me that you should sign the
>> statement. You agree with everything it says, even if you wish it said some
>> other things. And if you're truly being open-minded about this, you will
>> want to avoid the circular logic involved in not signing. ("I won't sign it
>> because it doesn't have wide enough support.")
>>
>
> dlw: Ah, but I can't support giving a lot of attention to single-winner
> reforms when the empirical evidence suggests that it's the mix of
> multi-winner and single-winner that is of far greater import.
>
>
Seriously? You won't eat our chips and fish, because that's the wrong way
around?

Jameson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20111123/1521bf1f/attachment-0004.htm>