[EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S.

Markus Schulze markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de
Sat Nov 19 13:24:45 PST 2011


Hallo,

Mike Ossipoff wrote (19 Nov 2011):

 > Beatpath isn't a choice for a proposal in the U.S.

The Schulze method is analyzed here:

http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze1.pdf

The Schulze method satisfies anonymity, neutrality,
homogeneity, resolvability, Pareto, reversal symmetry,
mono-raise, mono-add-plump, Condorcet, Smith,
Schwartz, independence of clones, and independence of
Smith-dominated alternatives. It satisfies Woodall's
CDTT criterion, Woodall's plurality criterion,
Ossipoff's SFC, and Ossipoff's SDSC.

The Schulze method has been published several times
in scientific journals and in scientific books.

The Schulze method is currently used by more than
50 organizations with more than 70,000 members in
total.

Of all Condorcet methods, that are currently discussed,
the Schulze method is that method that has the best
chances of getting adopted.

Markus Schulze




More information about the Election-Methods mailing list