2004-May Archives by Author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat May 1 00:37:03 2004
Ending: Mon May 31 23:10:02 2004
Messages: 332

• [EM] Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] difficulty of interpersonal comparisons in utility   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] difficulty of interpersonal comparisons in utility   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Who are we?   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Definition of _fully_ voting one candidate over another   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Re: Definition of fully voting one candidate over another   =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?=
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Chris Benham
• [EM] "equal sum" ratings ?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Ease of Voting   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Chris Benham
• [EM] Two-Round MCA ?   Chris Benham
• Fwd: [EM] The new poll   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Quota-Limited Weighted Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Condorcet strategy   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] Who Are We?   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] I found a study from Emmanuel Mangin (in French)   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Voting mathematics in Irish system (STV)   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Meeting about electoral reform of Netherlands   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Introductory Message   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Nanson   Simon Gazeley
• [EM] Voting mathematics in Irish system (STV)   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #581 - 8 msgs   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Re: Jame G.'s & Curt's Strange Prediction About Your Voting   James Gilmour
• [EM] James G., IRV   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proxy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proxy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] difficulty of interpersonal comparisons in utility   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Can every issue be resolved on to a 1D spectrum?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] please glance at essay: "Reciprocal Pairing"   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] please glance at essay: "Reciprocal Pairing"   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] collective budget setting proposal   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] don't call people something that they ask not to be called   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] name game   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Reply was interrupted.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Who Are We?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] collective budget setting proposal   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ATLO foils defectgion in James' example   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RMDD foils truncation in James' example.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] the Wrath of Ossipoff   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] jargon dictionary suggestion   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] jargon dictionary suggestion   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Examples with 4 options for immune methods   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] The ElectionMethods Wikipedia clone at GrouCho   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Markov chain approaches   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Possible advantage of NES (& maybe DSV) over wv with AERLO   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Sequential dropping by "contestation" - a method related to the Banks set   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Markov chain approaches   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Sequential dropping towards a spanning tree - another immune method related to ranked pairs and river   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Sequential dropping towards a spanning tree - another immune method related to ranked pairs and river   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] questions about SF's version of IRV   Bart Ingles
• [EM] questions about SF's version of IRV   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] "equal sum" ratings ?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Cumulative Vote equivalence to Plurality   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Ken Johnson
• [EM] IRV - how many candidates per party?   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Re: IRV - how many candidates per party?   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Introductory Message   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Knesset approves raising vote threshold from 1.5% to 2%   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Ease of Voting   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] questions about SF's version of IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] questions about SF's version of IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV - how many candidates per party?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Introductory Message   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Robert's Ruls of Order   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Ease of Voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Ease of Voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Ease of Voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Proxy - beyond PR   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet strategy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] To James re: ATLO   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Jan Kok
• [EM] Utilities and CR terminology [Was: Efforts to improve on CR's strategy]   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Can every issue be resolved on to a 1D spectrum?   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Shutting down Yahoo Groups access; this group is not hosted at Yahoo   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] collective budget setting proposal   Peter Maxwell
• [EM] Election Methods and DanceSport   Xavier Mora
• [EM] Tie-Breaking Strategies for Tideman's Ranked Pairs Method   Xavier Mora
• [EM] IRV - how many candidates per party?   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Proper use of better-than-expectation Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Eight FBCs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Borda for circular tie? No.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Jeff O'Neil, Re: Merrill, etc.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Stepwise AERLO option   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ERBucklin with AERLO, and Strong FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Direct Democracy vs "Representative" Democracy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] (no subject)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Grand Jury Approach. Condorcet(opposing votes).   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Strong SFC and Strong GSFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I meant Mn(Mn-1(Mn-2(.....(M1(M0)))...)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Proxy financial disincentive needn't be a problem.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Has anyone counted the EM presidential poll voted in February & March?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Nader won in Approval,, Plurality, and probably Condorcet.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] There were 9 ballots in the EM presidential poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] NES--Quick Preliminary Reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Proxy situation question reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRNR   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More Poll Results--Approval, CR, Bucklin w/ AERLO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #581 - 8 msgs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ken Johnson's Approval bad-example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Nader is voted CW--He has a 1st choice majority   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ken's example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James G.'s and Curt's strange prediction about your voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SSFC is attainable if we accept 0-winner outcome. Maybe if we don't?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A weaker SSFC, and a stronger SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Efforts to Improve on CR's Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Jame G.'s & Curt's Strange Prediction About Your Voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bolson reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ease of Voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs Plurality   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James G., IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Bolson Reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Gervase Lam, ratings reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RMDD is feasible, if sometimes awkward. SSSC & SSFC are feasibly attainable.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SSFC is attainable only if an existing candidate needn't win.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James G.--I didn't mean to imply that.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The new poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bolson reply, 5/23/04   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: The new poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Summary of strategy enhancements for Condorcet wv   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Other 2-balloting Condorcet wv enhancements   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Desirability of the majority defensive strategy criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] name game   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply was interrupted.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The complete list of name abbreviation alternatives   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Hyphenation-reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet Strategy Reply, part 1 (of 3)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ATLO foils defectgion in James' example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RMDD foils truncation in James' example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To James re: ATLO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] EM's Jargon dictionary   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Two definitions of strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Definition of _fully_ voting one candidate over another   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Omission in voting definition yesterday   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Definition of fully voting one candidate over another   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Two definiltions of strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Definitions of some terms recently used in postings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Brian Olson
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   Brian Olson
• [EM] Proportional Proxy?   Brian Olson
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Brian Olson
• [EM] Re: Efforts to Improve on CR's Strategy   Brian Olson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Brian Olson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Brian Olson
• [EM] difficulty of interpersonal comparisons in utility   Brian Olson
• [EM] Gervase Lam, ratings reply   Brian Olson
• [EM] difficulty of interpersonal comparisons in utility   Brian Olson
• [EM] Gervase Lam, ratings reply   Brian Olson
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Brian Olson
• Fwd: [EM] The new poll   Brian Olson
• [EM] The new poll   Brian Olson
• [EM] Proxy   Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Who Are We? [on election-methods]   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Condorcet strategy   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] jargon dictionary suggestion   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] jargon dictionary suggestion   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Two definitions of strategy   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Pseudo-election reform in California   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] jargon dictionary suggestion   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Meeting about electoral reform of Netherlands   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Presidential election   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Introductory Message   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] plurality - mandate length   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Nanson   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: Your opinion   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Who are we?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] condorcet/borda   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Some unfortunately too strong Defensive Strategy Criterion   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Election Methods and DanceSport   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Sequential dropping towards a spanning tree - another immune method related to ranked pairs and river   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Election Methods and DanceSport   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Sequential dropping towards a spanning tree - another immune method related to ranked pairs and river   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Tie-Breaking Strategies for Tideman's Ranked Pairs Method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Your opinion   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Shutting down Yahoo Groups access; this group is not hosted at Yahoo   Markus Schulze
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Direct Democracy vs "Representative" Democracy   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Curt Siffert
• [EM] (no subject)   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Proxy   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Proxy   Curt Siffert
• [EM] proxy system   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRNR   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Ease of Voting   Curt Siffert
• [EM] James G.'s and Curt's strange prediction about your voting   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Re: Jame G.'s & Curt's Strange Prediction About Your Voting   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Candidate Proxy Origins   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Search Engines & Election Methods?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax (opp votes) with AERLO   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Does DD make PR obsolete?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Ease of Voting   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] difficulty of interpersonal comparisons in utility (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cumulative Vote equivalence to Plurality   Forest Simmons
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Alex Small
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Alex Small
• [EM] The Onion weighs in on democracy   Alex Small
• [EM] Eight FBCs   Alex Small
• [EM] ERBucklin with AERLO, and Strong FBC   Alex Small
• [EM] Who Are We?   Alex Small
• [EM] Pseudo-election reform in California   Alex Small
• [EM] Pseudo-election reform in California--CORRECTION   Alex Small
• [EM] Has anyone counted the EM presidential poll voted in February & March?   Rob Speer
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Adam Tarr
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Adam Tarr
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Proxy   Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Proxy   Adam Tarr
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #581 - 8 msgs   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Gervase Lam, ratings reply   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Condorcet strategy and anti-strategy measures   Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] Nanson   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] IRV's "majority winner". What if we let the people choose?   Ken Taylor
• [EM] ATLO foils defectgion in James' example   Ken Taylor
• [EM] EM's Jargon dictionary   Ken Taylor
• [EM] Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Web toy   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Markov chain approaches   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] IRNR   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] IRNR   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Efforts to improve on CR's strategy   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Proxy - bicameral   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Ease of Voting   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Re: Ease of Voting   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Grand EM poll   bql@bolson.org
• Fwd: [EM] The new poll   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] don't call people something that they ask not to be called   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] Who Are We?   bql@bolson.org
• [EM] questions about SF's version of IRV   sdfgdfg sdfgdfs
• [EM] Grand EM poll   stephane.rouillon@sympatico.ca
• [EM] Search Engines & Election Methods?   wclark@xoom.org
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   wclark@xoom.org
• [EM] IRV & Spoiler Effect   wclark@xoom.org
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #581 - 8 msgs   wclark@xoom.org
• [EM] Who Are We?   wclark@xoom.org

Last message date: Mon May 31 23:10:02 2004
Archived on: Mon May 31 22:10:02 2004

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...