March 2005 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Mar 1 02:36:35 PST 2005
Ending: Thu Mar 31 23:35:28 PST 2005
Messages: 555

• [EM] Markus, criteria   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, criteria   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, criteria   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] (no subject)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Deriving Better-Than-Expectation from Weber´s strategic values   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria   Alex Small
• [EM] To Paul & Markus, about criteria definedness   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 1 March, ´05, 1800 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo: CW, not sincere Smith set   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ, 1 March, ´05, 1850 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• RE: [EM] Russ, 1 March, ´05, 1850 GMT   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Kevin, 1 March, 1918 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Paul & Markus, about criteria definedness   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, 1 March, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B405?=, 1800 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Terminology and precision of definitions   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Kevin, 1 March, 1918 GMT   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] R. B. MacSmith   Forest Simmons
• [EM] R. B. MacSmith   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Russ reply, 2 March, ´05, 1151 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 2 March, ´05, 1130 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 2 March, ´05, 1317 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 2 March, 1349 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation   Chris Benham
• [EM] Kevin, 2 March, ´'5, 1425 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 2 March, '05, 1317 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, 2 March, 1349 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Random Ballot Needle Point   Forest Simmons
• [EM] (no subject)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Preference Cascades   Ted Stern
• [EM] Russ reply, 2 March, ´05, 1151 GMT   Russ Paielli
• [EM] R. B. MacSmith   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Russ, 2 March, 1952 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ, 2 March, 1952 GMT   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] No, Random Candidate doesn´t meet FBC (as of now)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Exactly: Voting systems that allow true preference expression   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Methods that pass SFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ, 3 March, '05, 1730 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "strategy" of IRV advocates   Ted Stern
• [EM] Poll/Approval Strategies and Lotteries   Forest Simmons
• [EM] An axiomatic definition of "preference"   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Exactly: Voting systems that allow true preference expression   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Dave Ketchum
• =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:=20[EM]=20No, =20Random=20Candidate=20doesn=B4t=20meet?= FBC (as of now)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] BeatpathWinner/CSSD and FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, I´ll clarify your answer   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin, 4 March, '05, 1310 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chain Climbing methods   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Markus, I'll clarify your answer   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Paul, 4 March, '05, 1450 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")   Russ Paielli
• Re: [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Margins fails FBC, with 3 candidates   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why my criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why my criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")   Chris Benham
• [EM] The resolute model?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 2 March, '05, 1317   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Yes: FBC must speak of a set of same-preference, same-voting voters   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, Gibbard-Satterthwaite   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Yes: FBC must speak of a set of same-preference, same-voting voters   Markus Schulze
• [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"   Russ Paielli
• [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm   Russ Paielli
• [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A Recursive Lottery Shell   Forest Simmons
• [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: chain climbing methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] my last post: a clarification   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Briefer demonstration for Better-Than-Expectation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC and several favorites   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise   Steven Barney
• [EM] I have to rescind my method (a better one exists)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Russ, SFC, and wv vs margins   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion')   Ted Stern
• [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems   Alex Small
• [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method")   Chris Benham
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Methods that apply to more than MinMax :-)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: chain climbing methods   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: chain climbing methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion')   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] publicly acceptable election methods   Russ Paielli
• [EM] publicly acceptable election methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] publicly acceptable election methods   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV Failures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV Failures   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV Failures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV Failures   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient?   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV Failures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] publicly acceptable election methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV Failures   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV Failures   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV Failures   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IRV Failures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV Failures   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] IRV Failures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV Failures   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV Failures   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV Failures   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV Failures   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV Failures   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Re: is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: chain climbing methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.   Eric Gorr
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise   Ted Stern
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise   Russ Paielli
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data   Eric Gorr
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval/Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ, 12 March, '05, 0645 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Ramon Llull method = ?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Ramon Llull method = ?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ramon Llull method = ?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below"   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Why IRV is popular   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below"   Ted Stern
• [EM] Why IRV is popular   Alex Small
• [EM] Ted's Total Approval Beatpath   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Yes, the Approval loser can be the CW.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Why IRV is popular   James Green-Armytage
• [Fwd: [EM] Approval/Condorcet]   Russ Paielli
• [EM] sequential dropping   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Why IRV is popular   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Why Condorcet should be more popular than IRV (was: Why IRV is popular)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Why IRV is popular   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Why IRV is popular   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR)   Jan Kok
• [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR)   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Round Robins   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Round Robins   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Round Robins   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Round Robins   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Round Robins   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Round Robins   Alex Small
• [EM] Round Robins   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ, 14 March, '05, 0700 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   Russ Paielli
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...")   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...")   Juho Laatu
• [EM] sequential dropping   Markus Schulze
• [EM] sequential dropping   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] sequential dropping   Markus Schulze
• [EM] sequential dropping   Chris Benham
• [EM] majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] sequential dropping   Markus Schulze
• [EM] sequential dropping   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)   Chris Benham
• [EM] correction   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval Voting & Spoiler Effect   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] sequential dropping   Chris Benham
• [EM] sequential dropping   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath")   Ted Stern
• [EM] Round Robins   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Round Robins pass 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)   Ted Stern
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] Automatic gerrymandering   Michael A. Rouse
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath")   Forest Simmons
• [EM] About random election methods   Andrew Myers
• [EM] About random election methods   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Ted Stern
• [EM] least additional votes   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Round Robins   Gervase Lam
• [EM] sequential dropping   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: About random election methods   Andrew Myers
• [EM] "spoiler effect" argument   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Round Robins   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] About random election methods   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet proposals   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet proposals   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] publicly acceptable election methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Round Robins   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] sequential dropping   Markus Schulze
• [EM] About random election methods   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] About random election methods   Eric Gorr
• [EM] About random election methods, CDTT,RB   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Ted Stern
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it)   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Ted Stern
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Russ Paielli
• [EM] About random election methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9   Greg Dennis
• [EM] Re: San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9   Eric Gorr
• [EM] How to describe RAV/ARC   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: least additional votes   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Triangle plotter available if anyone would like it   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] least additional votes   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Forest's Random Ballot among the candidates not strongly beaten (was: How to describe RAV/ARC)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem   condorcetfan at delphiforums.com
• [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] a name for random ballot from P   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin, 17 March, '05, 0320 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 2nd Kevin reply on 17 March GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Kevin, 17 March, '05, 0320 GMT   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Raynaud   Chris Benham
• [EM] Full Majority as Part of Strong Defeat   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] TSA/DMC, etc. (was Total Approval Ranked Pairs)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic Approval and Bubble Sorted Approval (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] PSA/DMC etc. (was "Re: TSA/DMC, etc.")   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] One more comment on Kevin's example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots   Bart Ingles
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Raynaud   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Raynaud   Chris Benham
• [EM] Definite Majority Choice, first round public proposal (draft)   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] One more comment on Kevin's example   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, first round public proposal (draft)   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Markus, 19 March, '05, 0230 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin, 19 March, '05, 0330 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Demonstrations that BeatpathWinner meets WDSC & SFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris, equal-ranking incentive   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 19 March, '05, 0230 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Kevin, 19 March, '05, 0330 GMT   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] My voting calculator   Eric Gorr
• [EM] we shouldn't call majority rule cycles "ties"   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Kevin, 20 March, '05, 0300   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin, 0330 GMG, 20 March, '05   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 20 March, 0440 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin, 20 March, '05, 0300   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Russ Paielli
• [EM] generalization of AERLO/ATLO: S/WPO   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Markus, 20 March, 0440 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Russ Paielli
• [EM] S/WPO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ERIRV doesn't fail your criterion. Netiher does IRV or Plurality.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Markus, 21 March, '05, 0603 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 0633 GMT, 21 March, '05   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] AERLO and ATLO definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Burial and Defection with the "defeat-droppers".   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Chris, equal-ranking incentive   Chris Benham
• [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, 21 March, '05, 0603 GMT   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Ted's DMC proposal   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P   Forest Simmons
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Forest Simmons
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Forest Simmons
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Russ Paielli
• [EM] 4-candidate CDTT LNHarm failures   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Truncation incentive with LNHarm (was "Burying and defection")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Markus, 22 March, '05, 0400 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris, DD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Chris, criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Does VFA (Vote For and Against) meet SDSC?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Chris, DD   Chris Benham
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer Method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: S/WPO   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Eric Gorr
• [EM] winning ratings differentials versus marginal ratings differentials   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] Washington State IRV initiative text   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Some hard example for Approval Voting   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Some hard example for Approval Voting   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Dyadic Weighted Pairwise ( was S/WPO )   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Dyadic Weighted Pairwise ( was S/WPO )   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Kevin--Your method and SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval's bad-example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better short definition of voting X over Y. Long definition is official, though.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March, '05, 0600 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: Approval Questions   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] CWO may be worth fighting for   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   James Gilmour
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer Method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] I forgot something important...   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Sincere methods   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: Sincere methods   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Re: Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Sincere methods   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Sincere methods   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Re: Some hard example for Approval Voting   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Russ Paielli
• [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information   Russ Paielli
• [EM] CWO may be worth fighting for   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Sincere methods   Gervase Lam
• [EM] better names for "sequential dropping"   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Sincere methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer   Russ Paielli
• [EM] better names for "sequential dropping"   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "plain Condorcet" debate   James Green-Armytage
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Chris Benham
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Chris Benham
• [EM] Raynaud not monotonic   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Approval Questions   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval Questions   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: public acceptability   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Sincere Methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval Questions   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A precise abstract definition of preference   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Simpson-Kramer   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, about PC and Simpson-Kramer   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Andrew: Sincere methodsd   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris--Plurality, a pork chop, and NDD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification about pork-chops meeting criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Andrew: Sincere methodsd   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Is an approval cutoff option necessary?   Monkey Puzzle
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: Quartiles for CR   Forest Simmons
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Social utility is more important than median utility   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How would Median CR work?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Early discussion of wv on EM   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 1996 March 24 advocacy of wv   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Continuation of that 1996 March 24 posting to EM, advocating wv   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV & Participation Criterion   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV & Participation Criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Social utility is more important than median utility   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Distance measure--Are issue-position differences additive?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation and IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems   Russ Paielli
• [EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mike: cardinal pairwise   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Mike: strategy terms   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Mike: majority rule definition   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   Bart Ingles
• [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] correction   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James: Part II, strategy terms   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze   Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
• [EM] James: Part II, strategy terms   James Green-Armytage
• [EM]CNTT,QLTD ? (enquiry from John Hodges)   Chris Benham
• [EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion   Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
• [EM]CNTT,QLTD ? (enquiry from John Hodges)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] LNHarm performance; majority rule definitions   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] (oops) Smith//Truncation set   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] median rating / lower quartile   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Democratic Fair Choice   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] LNHarm performance: from B to A   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Democratic Fair Choice   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Manipulation Proofing Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Juho Laatu
• [EM] James--Majority rule definition, 29 March, 0632 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Conversationis with people new to voting systems   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition   Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
• [EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT   Chris Benham
• [EM] Approval Strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Democratic Fair Choice   Forest Simmons
• [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Sincere methods   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Markus--BeatpathWinner isn't SSD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris--burying   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Order-reversal correction   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ralph--rating every candidate low   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Voting correction   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] LNHarm performance: MMPO   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD   Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Chris Benham
• [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] election-methods-electorama.com at electorama.com   Chris Benham
• [EM] election-methods-electorama.com at electorama.com   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] DMC,AWP,AM   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] DMC,AWP,AM   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Sincere methods   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Voting paradoxes   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Re: BeatpathWinner is SSD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval Strategies   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM   Chris Benham
• [EM] Sincere methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 9, Issue 87   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval Strategies   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM   Forest Simmons
• [EM] condorcet methods   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Schulze's method isn't BeatpathWinner   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] condorcet methods   Bart Ingles
• [EM] condorcet methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Distance measure--Are issue-position differences additive?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: SSD is BeatpathWinner   MIKE OSSIPOFF

Last message date: Thu Mar 31 23:35:28 PST 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:54 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...