March 2005 Archives by date
Starting: Tue Mar 1 02:36:35 PST 2005
Ending: Thu Mar 31 23:35:28 PST 2005
Messages: 555
- [EM] Markus, criteria
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus, criteria
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus, criteria
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] (no subject)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Deriving Better-Than-Expectation from Weber´s strategic values
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria
Alex Small
- [EM] To Paul & Markus, about criteria definedness
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 1 March, ´05, 1800 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Typo: CW, not sincere Smith set
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ, 1 March, ´05, 1850 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Russ, 1 March, ´05, 1850 GMT
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Kevin, 1 March, 1918 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] To Paul & Markus, about criteria definedness
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus, 1 March, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B405?=, 1800 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Terminology and precision of definitions
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Kevin, 1 March, 1918 GMT
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] R. B. MacSmith
Forest Simmons
- [EM] R. B. MacSmith
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Russ reply, 2 March, ´05, 1151 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 2 March, ´05, 1130 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 2 March, ´05, 1317 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 2 March, 1349 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation
Chris Benham
- [EM] Kevin, 2 March, ´'5, 1425 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 2 March, '05, 1317 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus, 2 March, 1349 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Random Ballot Needle Point
Forest Simmons
- [EM] (no subject)
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Preference Cascades
Ted Stern
- [EM] Russ reply, 2 March, ´05, 1151 GMT
Russ Paielli
- [EM] R. B. MacSmith
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Russ, 2 March, 1952 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ, 2 March, 1952 GMT
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
- [EM] No, Random Candidate doesn´t meet FBC (as of now)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Exactly: Voting systems that allow true preference expression
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Methods that pass SFC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ, 3 March, '05, 1730 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] "strategy" of IRV advocates
Ted Stern
- [EM] Poll/Approval Strategies and Lotteries
Forest Simmons
- [EM] An axiomatic definition of "preference"
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Exactly: Voting systems that allow true preference expression
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Dave Ketchum
- =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:=20[EM]=20No, =20Random=20Candidate=20doesn=B4t=20meet?= FBC (as of now)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] BeatpathWinner/CSSD and FBC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, I´ll clarify your answer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin, 4 March, '05, 1310 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chain Climbing methods
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Markus, I'll clarify your answer
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Paul, 4 March, '05, 1450 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
Russ Paielli
- Re: [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Margins fails FBC, with 3 candidates
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Why my criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Why my criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
Chris Benham
- [EM] The resolute model?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 2 March, '05, 1317
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Yes: FBC must speak of a set of same-preference, same-voting voters
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, Gibbard-Satterthwaite
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Yes: FBC must speak of a set of same-preference, same-voting voters
Markus Schulze
- [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Russ Paielli
- [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm
Russ Paielli
- [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Forest Simmons
- [EM] A Recursive Lottery Shell
Forest Simmons
- [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Cardinal Pairwise
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: chain climbing methods
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
- [EM] my last post: a clarification
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Briefer demonstration for Better-Than-Expectation
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] FBC and several favorites
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise
Steven Barney
- [EM] I have to rescind my method (a better one exists)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Russ, SFC, and wv vs margins
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion')
Ted Stern
- [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems
Alex Small
- [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method")
Chris Benham
- [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Methods that apply to more than MinMax :-)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: chain climbing methods
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method")
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: chain climbing methods
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion')
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] publicly acceptable election methods
Russ Paielli
- [EM] publicly acceptable election methods
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient?
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] publicly acceptable election methods
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] IRV Failures
Eric Gorr
- [EM] IRV Failures
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] IRV Failures
Eric Gorr
- [EM] IRV Failures
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient?
Chris Benham
- [EM] IRV Failures
Eric Gorr
- [EM] publicly acceptable election methods
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] IRV Failures
Chris Benham
- [EM] IRV Failures
Bart Ingles
- [EM] IRV Failures
Markus Schulze
- [EM] IRV Failures
Eric Gorr
- [EM] IRV Failures
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] IRV Failures
Eric Gorr
- [EM] IRV Failures
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] IRV Failures
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] IRV Failures
Eric Gorr
- [EM] IRV Failures
Bart Ingles
- [EM] IRV Failures
Diana Galletly
- [EM] Re: is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: chain climbing methods
Forest Simmons
- [EM] What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.
Eric Gorr
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise
Ted Stern
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data
bql at bolson.org
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise
Russ Paielli
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data
Eric Gorr
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise
Chris Benham
- [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.
Ted Stern
- [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc.
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Approval/Condorcet
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ, 12 March, '05, 0645 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Ramon Llull method = ?
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Ramon Llull method = ?
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Ramon Llull method = ?
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below"
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Why IRV is popular
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Ted Stern
- [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below"
Ted Stern
- [EM] Why IRV is popular
Alex Small
- [EM] Ted's Total Approval Beatpath
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Yes, the Approval loser can be the CW.
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Why IRV is popular
James Green-Armytage
- [Fwd: [EM] Approval/Condorcet]
Russ Paielli
- [EM] sequential dropping
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems
Gervase Lam
- [EM] Why IRV is popular
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Why Condorcet should be more popular than IRV (was: Why IRV is popular)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Why IRV is popular
RLSuter at aol.com
- [EM] Why IRV is popular
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR)
Jan Kok
- [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR)
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Round Robins
Alex Small
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Round Robins
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Round Robins
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Round Robins
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Round Robins
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Round Robins
Alex Small
- [EM] Round Robins
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Russ, 14 March, '05, 0700 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
Russ Paielli
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...")
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...")
Juho Laatu
- [EM] sequential dropping
Markus Schulze
- [EM] sequential dropping
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] sequential dropping
Markus Schulze
- [EM] sequential dropping
Chris Benham
- [EM] majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] sequential dropping
Markus Schulze
- [EM] sequential dropping
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)
Chris Benham
- [EM] correction
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Approval Voting & Spoiler Effect
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] sequential dropping
Chris Benham
- [EM] sequential dropping
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath")
Ted Stern
- [EM] Round Robins
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Round Robins pass 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling
Ted Stern
- [EM] Re: Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)
Ted Stern
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
Fan de Condorcet
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
Fan de Condorcet
- [EM] Automatic gerrymandering
Michael A. Rouse
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath")
Forest Simmons
- [EM] About random election methods
Andrew Myers
- [EM] About random election methods
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Ted Stern
- [EM] least additional votes
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Round Robins
Gervase Lam
- [EM] sequential dropping
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: About random election methods
Andrew Myers
- [EM] "spoiler effect" argument
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Round Robins
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] About random election methods
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet proposals
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it)
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet proposals
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] publicly acceptable election methods
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Round Robins
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] sequential dropping
Markus Schulze
- [EM] About random election methods
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] About random election methods
Eric Gorr
- [EM] About random election methods, CDTT,RB
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Ted Stern
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Re: visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it)
Ted Stern
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Ted Stern
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Russ Paielli
- [EM] About random election methods
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9
Greg Dennis
- [EM] Re: San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9
Eric Gorr
- [EM] How to describe RAV/ARC
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: least additional votes
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Triangle plotter available if anyone would like it
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC
Ted Stern
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0603 GMT
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV)
Chris Benham
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] least additional votes
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Ted Stern
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Forest's Random Ballot among the candidates not strongly beaten (was: How to describe RAV/ARC)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: How to describe RAV/ARC
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem
condorcetfan at delphiforums.com
- [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] a name for random ballot from P
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin, 17 March, '05, 0320 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] 2nd Kevin reply on 17 March GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Bart Ingles
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Markus, 16 March, '05, 0650 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Kevin, 17 March, '05, 0320 GMT
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Raynaud
Chris Benham
- [EM] Full Majority as Part of Strong Defeat
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] TSA/DMC, etc. (was Total Approval Ranked Pairs)
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Dyadic Approval and Bubble Sorted Approval (fwd)
Forest Simmons
- [EM] PSA/DMC etc. (was "Re: TSA/DMC, etc.")
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] One more comment on Kevin's example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Bart Ingles
- [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Raynaud
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Raynaud
Chris Benham
- [EM] Definite Majority Choice, first round public proposal (draft)
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] One more comment on Kevin's example
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, first round public proposal (draft)
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Markus, 19 March, '05, 0230 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin, 19 March, '05, 0330 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Demonstrations that BeatpathWinner meets WDSC & SFC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chris, equal-ranking incentive
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 19 March, '05, 0230 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Kevin, 19 March, '05, 0330 GMT
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] My voting calculator
Eric Gorr
- [EM] we shouldn't call majority rule cycles "ties"
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Kevin, 20 March, '05, 0300
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin, 0330 GMG, 20 March, '05
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 20 March, 0440 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Kevin, 20 March, '05, 0300
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
- [EM] generalization of AERLO/ATLO: S/WPO
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Markus, 20 March, 0440 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
- [EM] S/WPO
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] ERIRV doesn't fail your criterion. Netiher does IRV or Plurality.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Markus, 21 March, '05, 0603 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, 0633 GMT, 21 March, '05
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] AERLO and ATLO definitions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Burial and Defection with the "defeat-droppers".
Chris Benham
- [EM] Re: Chris, equal-ranking incentive
Chris Benham
- [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Markus, 21 March, '05, 0603 GMT
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
Chris Benham
- [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Ted's DMC proposal
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal
Monkey Puzzle
- [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Forest Simmons
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Forest Simmons
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Forest Simmons
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
- [EM] 4-candidate CDTT LNHarm failures
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Truncation incentive with LNHarm (was "Burying and defection")
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Markus, 22 March, '05, 0400 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chris, DD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Chris, criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Does VFA (Vote For and Against) meet SDSC?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Chris, DD
Chris Benham
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer Method
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: S/WPO
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Eric Gorr
- [EM] winning ratings differentials versus marginal ratings differentials
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Monkey Puzzle
- [EM] Washington State IRV initiative text
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Some hard example for Approval Voting
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Some hard example for Approval Voting
Rob LeGrand
- [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Dyadic Weighted Pairwise ( was S/WPO )
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Dyadic Weighted Pairwise ( was S/WPO )
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Kevin--Your method and SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Approval's bad-example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Better short definition of voting X over Y. Long definition is official, though.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March, '05, 0600 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: Approval Questions
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] CWO may be worth fighting for
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
James Gilmour
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer Method
Markus Schulze
- [EM] I forgot something important...
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Sincere methods
Eric Gorr
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: Sincere methods
Andrew Myers
- [EM] Re: Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Sincere methods
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March
Chris Benham
- [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Sincere methods
Andrew Myers
- [EM] Re: Some hard example for Approval Voting
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
- [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
- [EM] CWO may be worth fighting for
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Sincere methods
Gervase Lam
- [EM] better names for "sequential dropping"
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Sincere methods
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer
Russ Paielli
- [EM] better names for "sequential dropping"
Rob Lanphier
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer
Markus Schulze
- [EM] "plain Condorcet" debate
James Green-Armytage
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
- [EM] Raynaud not monotonic
Rob LeGrand
- [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: Approval Questions
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Approval Questions
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: public acceptability
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Sincere Methods
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Approval Questions
Forest Simmons
- [EM] A precise abstract definition of preference
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] James, about PC and Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Andrew: Sincere methodsd
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chris--Plurality, a pork chop, and NDD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Clarification about pork-chops meeting criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Andrew: Sincere methodsd
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Is an approval cutoff option necessary?
Monkey Puzzle
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: Quartiles for CR
Forest Simmons
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Fan de Condorcet
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Daniel Bishop
- [EM] Social utility is more important than median utility
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] How would Median CR work?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Early discussion of wv on EM
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] 1996 March 24 advocacy of wv
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Continuation of that 1996 March 24 posting to EM, advocating wv
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] IRV & Participation Criterion
Eric Gorr
- [EM] IRV & Participation Criterion
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Russ Paielli
- [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Social utility is more important than median utility
Bart Ingles
- [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Distance measure--Are issue-position differences additive?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Participation and IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems
Russ Paielli
- [EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Mike: cardinal pairwise
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Mike: strategy terms
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Mike: majority rule definition
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems
RLSuter at aol.com
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Bart Ingles
- [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] correction
James Green-Armytage
- [EM] James: Part II, strategy terms
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
- [EM] James: Part II, strategy terms
James Green-Armytage
- [EM]CNTT,QLTD ? (enquiry from John Hodges)
Chris Benham
- [EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion
Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
- [EM]CNTT,QLTD ? (enquiry from John Hodges)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] LNHarm performance; majority rule definitions
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] (oops) Smith//Truncation set
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Democratic Fair Choice
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] LNHarm performance: from B to A
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Re: Democratic Fair Choice
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Manipulation Proofing Approval
Forest Simmons
- [EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Juho Laatu
- [EM] James--Majority rule definition, 29 March, 0632 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: Conversationis with people new to voting systems
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition
Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
- [EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT
Chris Benham
- [EM] Approval Strategy
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Democratic Fair Choice
Forest Simmons
- [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Gervase Lam
- [EM] Sincere methods
Gervase Lam
- [EM] Markus--BeatpathWinner isn't SSD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Chris--burying
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Order-reversal correction
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Ralph--rating every candidate low
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Voting correction
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] LNHarm performance: MMPO
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD
Markus.Schulze at alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
- [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] election-methods-electorama.com at electorama.com
Chris Benham
- [EM] election-methods-electorama.com at electorama.com
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] DMC,AWP,AM
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM
Araucaria Araucana
- [EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] DMC,AWP,AM
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Gervase Lam
- [EM] Sincere methods
Gervase Lam
- [EM] Voting paradoxes
Joseph Malkevitch
- [EM] Re: BeatpathWinner is SSD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Approval Strategies
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM
Chris Benham
- [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 9, Issue 87
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Approval Strategies
Forest Simmons
- [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Forest Simmons
- [EM] condorcet methods
Curt Siffert
- [EM] Schulze's method isn't BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] condorcet methods
Bart Ingles
- [EM] condorcet methods
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Distance measure--Are issue-position differences additive?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
- [EM] Re: SSD is BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
Last message date:
Thu Mar 31 23:35:28 PST 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:54 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).