August 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Aug 1 07:07:02 PDT 2003
Ending: Sun Aug 31 16:52:02 PDT 2003
Messages: 392

• [EM] Re: Condorcet elimination PR   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV vs Plurality   Chris Benham
• [EM] Bucklin-Condorcet PR   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Bucklin-Condorcet PR (also Bucklin PR)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Bucklin-Condorcet PR (also Bucklin PR)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin   Chris Benham
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin (example corrected)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin (another example-related blunder fixed)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin   Chris Benham
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin   Chris Benham
• Questions for Eric G: sincerity (was Re: [EM] serious strategy problem ...   Craig Carey
• [EM] Optimización Electoral [Ecuador gov elections office   Craig Carey
• Proving B loses with heaps of votes (Re: [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Craig Carey
• Proving B loses with heaps of votes (Re: [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Craig Carey
• [EM] Hare and Droop, d'Hondt and Sainte-Lague   Donald Davison
• [EM] Does Droop give the same results as Hare?   Donald Davison
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Donald Davison
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Donald Davison
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Donald Davison
• [EM] (JBH) you wrote on August Third:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Olli - Your Truncation error in STV:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Code of Honor for Reform Acivists:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Eric Gorr and David Gamble's Running Debate:   Donald Davison
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Donald Davison
• [EM] FWD: Irving used in Party State Convention:   Donald Davison
• [EM] IRV and Plurality   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Neal Finne
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Neal Finne
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Neal Finne
• [SPAM: #] [EM] Approval Strategy   Neal Finne
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Does Droop give the same results as Hare?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   James Gilmour
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   James Gilmour
• [EM] Olli - Your Truncation error in STV:   James Gilmour
• [EM] Olli - Your Truncation error in STV:   James Gilmour
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] My Ranked Pairs   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Eric Gorr
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Eric Gorr
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Eric Gorr
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Eric Gorr and David Gamble's Running Debate:   Eric Gorr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Eric Gorr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Traveling Salesman   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet Loser Elimination PR   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV vs. Condorcet   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] the name of the rose   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] local CPO-STV   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] strategy problem   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Monroe article online, and Monroe's math   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Optimización Electoral   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] strategy problem   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] orphaned voting method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Orphaned Voting Method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] cheering for software   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] request for reading matter   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   John B. Hodges
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   John B. Hodges
• [EM] 2nd Query for Approval advocates   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Postscript:2nd Query for Approval advocates   John B. Hodges
• [EM] PostPostscript:2nd Query for Approval advocates   John B. Hodges
• [EM] What IRV optimizes   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Multiseat Bucklin? a naiive proposal   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Postscript: Multiseat Bucklin?   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Re: What IRV optimizes   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query re. Borda Elimination, "Baldwin"   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Bend it like Benham (his Bucklin-Condorcet PR]   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Postscript: Bend it like Benham   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Generalized Bucklin 2.2   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Re: Generalized Bucklin 2.2   John B. Hodges
• [EM] GB 2.2 vs. "The IRV Nightmare"   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Critics and Advocates   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Generalized Bucklin PR 2.3, basic PR examples   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity   John B. Hodges
• [EM] request for reading matter   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Ranking single-winner methods   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Bart Ingles
• [EM] the name of the rose   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Bucklin-Condorcet PR (also Bucklin PR)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Median and MCA/Generalised Bucklin (GB) [Was: Query for Approval advocates]   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: Borda-Elimination   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Borda-Elimination   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Query re. Borda Elimination, "Baldwin"   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Nanson and Borda   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Nanson and Borda   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Nanson and Borda   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: orphaned voting method   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] My pages have moved   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Nanson and Borda   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Joe Mason
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Joe Mason
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Joe Mason
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] SPPA - was STV district magnitude   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] World election   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Party labels voters   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] 2nd Query for Approval advocates   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Ranking single-winner methods   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Please   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] [EM} FPTP is not strategy proof!!!   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] FPTP is not strategy proof!!!   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] FPTP is not strategy proof!!!   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] mathematical norms   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Women proportion of the Irish parliament   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Info on election method needed   Mike Rouse
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Does Droop give the same results as Hare?   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Olli Salmi
• [EM] List PR with multiple votes per person?   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Olli - Your Truncation error in STV:   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Olli - Your Truncation error in STV:   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Optimización Electoral   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Women proportion of the Irish parliament   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Generalized Bucklin PR 2.3, basic PR examples   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Re: mathematical norms (Stephane Rouillon)   Olli Salmi
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Naive random UWA, timeshare, etc.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Another interesting method: Lin's Eigenvector Method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Another interesting method: Lin's Eigenvector Method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Markus Schulze
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] FPTP is not strategy proof!!!   Markus Schulze
• [EM] FPTP is not strategy proof!!!   Markus Schulze
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Improved Generalised Bucklin   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: "More general 5-candidate IRV failure example"   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: "More general 5-candidate IRV failure example"   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: "More general 5-candidate IRV failure example"   Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to convert a set of CR ballots to a set of Approval ballots   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How to convert a set of CR ballots to a set of Approval ballots   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Viability (finding the odds after you've voted)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Viability (finding the odds after you've voted)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Viability (finding the odds after you've voted)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How to convert a set of CR ballots to a set of Approval ballots   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Naive random UWA, timeshare, etc.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Forest Simmons
• [SPAM: #] [EM] Approval Strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] What IRV optimizes   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Local Kemenization   Forest Simmons
• [EM] issue space revisited   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] strategy problem   Forest Simmons
• [EM] strategy problem   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] issue space revisited   Forest Simmons
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Forest Simmons
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Forest Simmons
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Alex Small
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Alex Small
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Alex Small
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Alex Small
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem - The Return (again)   Alex Small
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Alex Small
• [EM] Approval Voting and Nash equilibria   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: IRV vs Plurality   Alex Small
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Alex Small
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Alex Small
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Alex Small
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Alex Small
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Alex Small
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Alex Small
• Correction Re: [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Alex Small
• [SPAM: #] [EM] Approval Strategy   Alex Small
• [EM] What IRV optimizes   Alex Small
• [EM] Postscript: Multiseat Bucklin?   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Alex Small
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Alex Small
• [EM] Code of Honor for Reform Acivists:   Alex Small
• [EM] Borda and Centrist Dominance   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Borda and Centrist Dominance--ERROR   Alex Small
• [EM] issue space revisited   Alex Small
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Alex Small
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Alex Small
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Alex Small
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Alex Small
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Alex Small
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Alex Small
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Alex Small
• [EM] orphaned voting method   Alex Small
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Alex Small
• [EM] Critics and Advocates   Alex Small
• [EM] Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics   Alex Small
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Rob Speer
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Rob Speer
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Rob Speer
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Rob Speer
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Rob Speer
• [EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method   Rob Speer
• [EM] Another interesting method: Lin's Eigenvector Method   Rob Speer
• [EM] Re: Nanson and Borda   Rob Speer
• [EM] Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Rob Speer
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Rob Speer
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Rob Speer
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Rob Speer
• [EM] issues IRV Condorcet Approval   Rob Speer
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Rob Speer
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Rob Speer
• [EM] Re: IRV vs Plurality   Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Issues, Condorcet, and IRV (was: IRV vs. plurality)   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Eric Gorr and David Gamble's Running Debate:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cognitive Dissonance   Adam Tarr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Adam Tarr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Adam Tarr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Adam Tarr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Adam Tarr
• [EM] The Coming California Single Seat Election   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Critics and Advocates   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Request comments on MMP?   Adam Haas Tarr
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Adam Haas Tarr
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Adam Haas Tarr
• [EM] Electoral Index   Diego Tello
• [EM] Optimización Electoral   Diego Tello
• [EM] Optimización Electoral   Diego Tello
• [EM] Re: mathematical norms (Stephane Rouillon)   Diego Tello
• [EM] How to convert a set of CR ballots to a set of Approval ballots   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Viability (finding the odds after you've voted)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Viability (finding the odds after you've voted)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] How to convert a set of CR ballots to a set of Approval ballots   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Borda-Elimination   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Borda-Elimination   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV vs. Condorcet, Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] World election   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: IRV vs Plurality   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV and Plurality   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] The only strategy an Approval voter needs to know:   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Median and MCA/Generalised Bucklin (GB)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] List PR with multiple votes per person?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Nanson and Borda   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Naive random UWA, timeshare, etc.   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] World election   Doug Woodard
• [EM] Re: Condorcet elimination PR   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Condorcet Loser Elimination PR   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Truncation error in STV   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] IRV vs. plurality   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Approval Strategy   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Condorcet 2 - The Sequel ( the same people say the same things)   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cognitive Dissonance   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: serious strategy problem in Condorcet, but not in IRV?   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Analysis vs Proselytizing   Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] CONFIDENTIAL.   suleabutu at tiscali.co.uk

Last message date: Sun Aug 31 16:52:02 PDT 2003
Archived on: Thu Jan 8 17:24:18 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...