[EM] The Unique Winning Alliance method

[Markus Schulze]

Dear Rob,

you wrote (3 Aug 2003):
> The properties of this method:
> (...)
> * It is _not_ monotonic. The share that someone gets
> of the UWA might go down if they get additional votes.

You wrote (3 Aug 2003):
> Because it is not monotonic and not deterministic, I
> don't think UWA-Random is actually a very viable method.

Could you forward an example where monotonicity is violated?

Markus Schulze