June 2005 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Jun 1 03:07:18 PDT 2005
Ending: Thu Jun 30 18:29:16 PDT 2005
Messages: 313

• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] AERLO & CL-patch for MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] AERLO & CL-patch for MMPO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops--the comparison was with SD, not CWP   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops--the comparison was with SD, not CWP   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm   Russ Paielli
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James doesn't think people will favorite-bury in Condorcet   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] AERLO & CL-patch for MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] James doesn't think people will favorite-bury in Condorcet   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: BeatpathWinner algorithm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs   Russ Paielli
• [EM] FBC vs some other criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC vs some other criteria   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] suggestion for Approval/Pairwise method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] suggestion for Approval/Pairwise method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Scott--BeatpathWinner & CSSD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: BeatpathWinner algorithm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Russ's stories about me and computer programming   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Russ's stories about me and computer programming   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] suggestion for Approval/Pairwise method   Chris Benham
• [EM] Markus: BeatpathWinner algorithm   Russ Paielli
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Scott--BeatpathWinner & CSSD   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Introducing "Insanity Voting" - the only voting system which meets the Insanity Criterion   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Re: Scott--BeatpathWinner & CSSD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Scott's Insanity method and Insanity Criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Introducing "Insanity Voting" - the only voting system which meets the Insanity Criterion   Russ Paielli
• [EM] RE:MMPO, contd   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Introducing "Insanity Voting" - the only voting system which meets the Insanity Criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Fall Back Approval   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Fall Back Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 2)   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 3)   Gervase Lam
• [EM] preferences and approval with four candidates   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] MAM algorithm?   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Thanks for Sprucing-Up answers   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] AERLO, not cycle-collapsing, gives Strong FBC to MMPO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 12, Issue 10   Andrew Myers
• [EM] The special tie rule works with MinMax(wv) and (margins)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Does cycle-collapsing spoil MMPO's FBC compliance?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Does cycle-collapsing spoil MMPO's FBC compliance?   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Australian IRV voters (was" Does cycle-collapsing spoil MMPO's FBC compliance?")   Chris Benham
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: MMPO, contd   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] RE: Fall Back Approval   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Anthony: IRV strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris--That's good, stand by what you said   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods   Russ Paielli
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods   Anthony Duff
• [EM] MMPO vs PC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness   Chris Benham
• [EM] Plurality crireion (was "There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness")   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Plurality crireion (was "There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Chris: 3 Uniform factions, indecisive example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A problem, but not a problem for voters?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Campaign reform   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Campaign reform   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Fair coverage   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO vs PC addendum   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] MMPO vs PC addendum   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Fair coverage   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of WomenVoters of Minnesota   James Gilmour
• [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Campaign reform   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of WomenVoters of Minnesota   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Chris Benham
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmaxmethods   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MMPO vs PC addendum   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Chris: If just one "B" voter ranks a 2nd choice in your MMPO example...   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Campaign reform   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Not only _would_ Nader be CW, but Nader _is_ CW in most rank polls   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: Of course there's defensive truncation incentive   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: If just one "B" voter ranks a 2nd choice in your MMPO example...   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Not only _would_ Nader be CW, but Nader _is_ CW in most rank polls   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] approval and ICC   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Russ Paielli
• [EM] James: MMPO & criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] approval and ICC   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Mike: does MM(po) have compromising-reversal incentive??   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Chris Benham
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO (oops! CDTT, not CGTT)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Chris Benham
• [EM] SSD vs MMPO. What's important in voting system results.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO has incentive for reversa l, but not compromise-reversal.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO has incentive for reversa l, but not compromise-reversal.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Dynamic Opinion Poll in our Wiki   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Miscellaneous addenda to SSD vs MMPO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure   Juho Laatu
• [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval?   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Dynamic Opinion Poll in our Wiki   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] wv strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   Russ Paielli
• [EM] ICC posting comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] NANSON - Elections to one seat   Simon Gazeley
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] NANSON - Elections to one seat   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] order reversal incentive in approval?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] IRV _does_ meet IICC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James--MMPO & wv strategy wrap-up   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval and ICC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Nanson   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Two questions added to wiki questionaire   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] two more variations of MMPO   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: ICC and Approval   Russ Paielli
• [EM] wiki opinion poll   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] another wiki poll - assign ratings to single-winner methods!   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] wiki opinion poll   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Nanson   Simon Gazeley
• [EM] A simpler geographical example showing that mere ordinal info is inadequate   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Chris Benham
• [EM] Brief clarification of two recent postings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Sincere Optimality for Acceptable Candidates Criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] The Sincere Optimality for Acceptable Candidates Criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Are rank methods really better than Approval & CR?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Chris Benham
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Chris Benham
• [EM] the simplest election reform   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Minor corrections to yesterday's postings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Kevin: Oops! It's a matter of finding out how much of SOACC & SFBC can be saved.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Contd, Oops!   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] the simplest election reform   Andrew Myers
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] the simplest election reform   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] weigh in on the method poll!   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The wiki questionaire   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] weigh in on the method poll!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] weigh in on the method poll!   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Sincere Protection of Candidates Acceptable (SPCA)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Power truncation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Who says you can't vote a candidate at 2 rank positions.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification about ranking someone at 2 rank positions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Russ Paielli
• [EM] New name for SSPCA?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] weigh in on the method poll!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Power truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one   Chris Benham
• [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: the simplest election reform   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Election-methods Digest no longer reliable   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Election-methods Digest no longer reliable   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] The elusive description of enhanced MMPO's benefits   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SPCA, ASPCA, CSPCA yes. SOACC & SFBC no.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Enhanced MMPO fails FBC but conditionally meets expectation FBC.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Contd, ASPCA yes. SOACC & SFBC no.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: Power truncation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election-methods Digest no longer reliable   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] James: Power truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] AERLO loses any FBC. MMPO is Approval. Still the best public method.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] AERLO loses any FBC. MMPO is Approval. Still the best public method.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Power truncation   Chris Benham
• [EM] Power truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Clarification about trust & hope for borderline strategizers   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Power truncation   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris: Brief preliminary power truncation reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris, 6/19/05, 2209   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Russ's MinMax posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Kevin: Power Truncation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin: Your MMPOpt example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A few more comments about Russ's MMPO posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris--Correct: MMPO is Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin: Power Truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Comments on Russ's MinMax posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Chris Benham
• [EM] A new method satisfying FBC, SDSC, and SFC   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] FBC isn't complicated. PT isn't dangerous. Reform isn't whiny.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC isn't complicated. PT isn't dangerous. Reform isn't whiny.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Mike: what is the "tied at the top rule"?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] FBC isn't complicated. PT isn't dangerous. Reform isn't whiny.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Election Methods Polls   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Majority-defeat-disqualification//Approval sounds like the best   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Russ's MinMax posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Mike: my mistake   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Majority-defeat-disqualification//Approval sounds like the best   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] James: Definition, electowiki   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] James: Definition, electowiki   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Thought on Redistricting Algorithms   Alex Small
• [EM] Thought on Redistricting Algorithms   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki   Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Reform isn't whiny, but whining about reform suggestions is whiny.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] correction, was Re: James: Definition, electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Ted, 6/24/05,2124 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 2200 GMT, 24 June, '05, Ted   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Mr. Lomax's "non'-reply, part 1   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Mr. Lomax's posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting]   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Brief comment on Russ's posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Brief comment on Russ's posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Condorcet and FBC are incompatible   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE: FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] RE: FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Part 2, Mr. Lomax's posting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] MDDA3, 67%MDDA, & 67%MDDA3   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting]   Jobst Heitzig
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting]   Bill Clark
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting]   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] MDDA3, 67%MDDA, & 67%MDDA3   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   Kevin Venzke
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting]   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting]   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Russ: Abuses   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   Chris Benham
• [EM] Miscellaneous MMPO & MDDA comments.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO vs MDDA   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Miscellaneous MMPO & MDDA comments.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Miscellaneous comments on MMPO & MDDA   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: clone winner and three slot ballots   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Contd., Miscellaneous comments on MMPO & MDDA   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO vs MDDA, contd.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Suggested ballot for public poll on voting systems   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I left out the box for MDDA on the ballot. Corrected ballot.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] My MDDA ICC failure example was poorly-written   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Measuring the risk of strict ranking   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] That most ambitious criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] another wiki poll - assign ratings to single-winner methods!   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] another wiki poll - assign ratings to single-winner methods!   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity, MCA   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Try power truncation in the simulation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Corrected ballot   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity   James Green-Armytage

Last message date: Thu Jun 30 18:29:16 PDT 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:11 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...