[EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota
6049awj02 at sneakemail.com
Mon Jun 6 08:00:19 PDT 2005
I had joined the LWV a few years ago, but when I found out that they
blatantly oppose the First Amendment I dumped them ASAP. What else can
you call a prohibition on "issue-advocacy" ads within 60 days before a
general election? And what part of "Congress shall pass no law ..."
don't they understand?
Their stance on voting methods doesn't surprise me a bit.
Markus Schulze markus.schulze-at-alumni.tu-berlin.de |EMlist| wrote:
> the final report on the voting systems study of the
> League of Women Voters of Minnesota has been published:
> It says: "LWVMN supports the option to use Instant Runoff Voting
> to elect State or Local Officials in single seat elections. LWVMN
> also supports the continued use of the plurality voting system in
> our elections. (...) LWVMN does not support Approval, Borda Count,
> or Condorcet as alternative voting systems."
> Markus Schulze
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
More information about the Election-Methods