[EM] Power truncation
Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr
Thu Jun 16 23:49:27 PDT 2005
Mike,
--- MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp at hotmail.com> a écrit :
> In comparison to Approval, one fault of MMPO is that it doesn't let the
> voter fully vote against all of the unacceptable candidates. So is MMPO as
> good as Approval? Maybe not.
Interesting idea.
> But that can be fixed:
>
> Power Truncation:
>
> If the voter chooses the power truncation option, then any candidate whom
> s/he doesn't rank will be scored as if that voter has ranked every one of
> the other voters over that candidate.
>
> In other words, that voter is opting to increase the greatest votes-against
> of every candidate whom s/he doesn't rank.
>
> [end of power truncation definition]
I'm not sure this is a great idea. It seems obvious to me that most voters
would use Power Truncation by default. If so, then on these ballots:
49 A
24 B
27 C>B
A wins (51 votes opposition from B or C), and B does the worst (76 votes
opposition from C). I think this will force C voters to rank C=B.
Kevin Venzke
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list