April 2002 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Apr 1 10:26:49 PST 2002
Ending: Tue Apr 30 23:35:45 PDT 2002
Messages: 348

• [EM] AV used in Oshkosh, WI?   Steve Barney
• [EM] CPR's Steve Chessin lost goose in Australia. QE s'ware & Mike   Craig Carey
• [EM] When is Mr Ossipoff's "favorite" not a winner?   Craig Carey
• standards   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Nash Equilibrium   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Truncation criticized by IRVists   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Blake Cretney
• [EM] VIRUS --> Ali distribuirati   Blake Cretney
• [EM] 04/02/02 - We have No Evil of Non-Monotonicity:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/03/02 - Adam needs a method that will win elections for his party:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/03/02 - Cretney is not reading all his EM email:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/03/02 - Mr Stéphane Rouillon wrote:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/04/02 - Correction to 04/03/02 post:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/04/02 - Stéphane wrote: "I only prefer Hare quota..."   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/04/02 - Rob LeGrand's Three way Tie:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/05/02 - I Know the Drill, Adam, I'll be on the same page:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/06/02 - Meek and Droop can be eliminated:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/05/02 - Monotonicity is `Much Ado About Nothing':   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/10/02 - Reply to Stéphane:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/11/02 - Reply to `Cambridge Mass. example':   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/12/02 - Craig, you wrong me:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/12/02 - Favorite is the Approval Winner:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/12/02 - Re: Hare-Davison:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/12/02 - Re: Action - Rouillon's contest   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/14/02 - Partisan and Non-Partisan:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/16/02 - Best to use email to register:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/22/02 - Stéphane's poll is Hilarious:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/24/02 - FWD Letters of Stéphane:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 04/27/02 - Junk Election Methods vs The Allure of IRVing:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] 03/30/02 - Re: How to vote in Approval:   Dave Ketchum
• The French need IRV?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] New jargon list, footer change   Rob Lanphier
• Election of 1860 (was Re: [EM] Action)   Rob Lanphier
• Using abbreviations (Re: [EM] The Allure of IRV...)   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Doubts on Approval Strategy   Rob Lanphier
• Winning votes intuitive?   Rob LeGrand
• How to vote in Approval   Rob LeGrand
• How to vote in Approval   Rob LeGrand
• How to vote in Approval   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Interesting article   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] New clones definition?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] French election   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Approval discussions   Richard Moore
• [EM] Approval discussions   Richard Moore
• I was wrong   Richard Moore
• Approval discussion   Richard Moore
• [EM] election's utility approach   Richard Moore
• Generalized Approval Strategy (Was Re: [EM] election's utility approach)   Richard Moore
• Generalized Approval Strategy (Was Re: [EM] election's utility approach)   Richard Moore
• [EM] Generalized Approval Strategy Example   Richard Moore
• [EM] delta-p Approval strategy   Richard Moore
• delta-p Approval strategy   Richard Moore
• delta-p Approval strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] Optimal Approval strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] election-utility strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Richard Moore
• [EM] Doubts on Approval Strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] election-utility strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Richard Moore
• [EM] U.S.A. government elections, Seats Percentages versus Vo tes Percentages   Narins, Josh
• [EM] How to proceed   Narins, Josh
• [EM] 04/03/02 - Cretney is not reading all his EM email:   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Interesting article   Narins, Josh
• [EM]   Narins, Josh
• [EM] 04/05/02 - I Know the Drill, Adam, I'll be on the same p age:   Narins, Josh
• [EM] How to proceed   Narins, Josh
• [EM] RE: Action   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Action   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Action   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Josh: Set aside political differences   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Action   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Action   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Parliamentarianism   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Parliamentarianism   Narins, Josh
• The Rotted Electoral College (was Action)   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Midterm Candidates Raise Big Money   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Gerrymander story- Economist   Narins, Josh
• How to vote in Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Is winning votes intuitive?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] m vs wv reply continued   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Long version of IRV letter   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Equilibria of wv & margins   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] equlibrium issues   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] equilibrium definitions revised   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Is there an objective best candidate?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election Methods Research Group   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Standards   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why wv is nonfalsifying. Definitions.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] sincerity classification definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dominated deterrent strategies work   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Truncation criticized by IRVists   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Josh: Set aside political differences   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] PC error   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why wv is expressive   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why Approval is strongly nonfalsifying   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Calling Craig Layton & Tom Round   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 2 understatements   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Approval discussion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval: #votes allowed must exceed #seats   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why wv is completely expressive   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] falsifying voters' rankings--no.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Craig Carey's 2 questions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Elisabeth's questions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I volunteer for one of the topics   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Approval discussion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] election's utility approach   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• equilibria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Blake: criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criteria definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] margins & wv   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Stephane's poll--let's go with it.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Regarding the poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] majority definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] parlimentary single-winner choices   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Approval discussion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman, Hoffman, outcome-space   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Demorep, sincere votes   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why RP(wv) & CSSD meet GSFC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] the poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Probability function for Hoffman's method   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• ACC, more strategy-free?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Example Demorep requested   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• ACC strategy-free?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tried to register for poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Demorep, majority, wv   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] poll deadline correction   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] e-mail registration doesn't work   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] truncation vs equal-top-ranking, contd.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] delta-p Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• delta-p Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Wording correction   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• delta-p Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• The Allure of IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I tried to register for the poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• The Allure of IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• The Allure of IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] election-utility strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] corrected error in my posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 3-level Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] An alternative to Tideman   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] From top-2 to Weber   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Doubts about Approval Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 04/02/02 - We have No Evil of Non-Monotonicity:   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] 04/03/02 - Mr Stéphane Rouillon wrote:   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Hare-Davison quota   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Meek ?   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Cambridge Mass. example   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] BeatpathWinner   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• Action - Rouillon's contest   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Acronyms   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] 04/12/02 - Re: Hare-Davison:   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 04/12/02 - Re: Action - Rouillon's contest   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Criteria definitions   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] RP examples   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Approval...   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Regarding the poll   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 04/14/02 - Are you asking other lists to join your contest:   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Single winner election summary   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] I tried to register for the poll   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] 3-level Approval   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Majority Winners and 3-Level Approval   Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Truncation criticized by IRVists   Michael Rouse
• [EM] falsifying voters' rankings--no.   Michael Rouse
• [EM] falsifying voters' rankings--no.   Michael Rouse
• [EM] Unicameral/Polycameral Legislatures   Michael Rouse
• [EM] Proportional Strength Binary Tree Legislature   Michael Rouse
• [EM] BASIC PARTS OF THE B.C. GREEN PARTY P.R. PROPOSAL FEB. 2002   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Parliamentarianism   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Parliamentarianism   Olli Salmi
• [EM] RE: BC & PR   Olli Salmi
• [EM] RE: BC & PR   Olli Salmi
• [EM] IRV in Australia (was How to Vote in Approval)   Olli Salmi
• Approval in E Europe [was IRV...; was ...Approval]   Olli Salmi
• [EM] The Speaker   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Bounded AV   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Interesting article   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] How to proceed   Anthony Simmons
• Interesting article   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] 03/30/02 - Re: How to vote in Approval:   Forest Simmons
• How to vote in Approval   Forest Simmons
• Equilibrium in Approval Voting and Repeated Balloting   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Lincoln; Big money, gerrymanders, rotten EC, etc.   Forest Simmons
• The Allure of IRV   Forest Simmons
• The Allure of IRV   Forest Simmons
• [EM] election-utility strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Saari and Cyclic Ambiguities   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Issue Space, Democracy Potential, and Hybrid Proxy Approval (was election-utility strategy)   Forest Simmons
• The Allure of IRV (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Majority Winners and 3-Level Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Bounded AV   Forest Simmons
• Re:[EM] We have No Evil of Non-Monotonicity:   Alex Small
• Re: [EM] 04/03/02 - Adam needs a method that will win elections for his party:   Alex Small
• [EM]   Alex Small
• [EM] Equilibrium in Approval Voting   Alex Small
• [EM]   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Equilibrium in Approval Voting   Alex Small
• [EM] Fallacy in proof   Alex Small
• [EM] Letter to Editor for LP News   Alex Small
• [EM] I was wrong   Alex Small
• [EM] Action   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] Action   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] Election Methods Research Group   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] Action   Alex Small
• [EM] Action   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] I volunteer for one of the topics   Alex Small
• Re: [EM] The Rotted Electoral College (was Action)   Alex Small
• Re;[EM] Lincoln; Big money, gerrymanders, rotten EC, etc.   Alex Small
• [EM] one more thing   Alex Small
• [EM] Democratizing the Senate   Alex Small
• [EM] Addendum   Alex Small
• [EM] The Allure of IRV...   Alex Small
• re:[EM] The Allure of IRV   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] The Allure of IRV   Alex Small
• [EM] Number Voting?   Alex Small
• re:[EM] Number Voting   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] Number Voting   Alex Small
• re:[EM] Junk Election Methods vs. the Allure of IRVING   Alex Small
• [EM] Forest's 3-bit approval method   Alex Small
• re: [EM] Announcement from Paul Hager   Alex Small
• re: [EM] 3-level approval   Alex Small
• [EM] Approval Strategy (was the Allure of IRV)   Alex Small
• RE: [EM] Gerrymander story- Economist   Alex Small
• [EM] Ventura   Alex Small
• [EM] Majority Winners and 3-Level Approval   Alex Small
• [EM] 04/03/02 - Adam needs a method that will win elections for his party:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 04/04/02 - Rob LeGrand's Three way Tie:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Equilibrium in Approval Voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM]   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Equilibrium in Approval Voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 04/05/02 - I Know the Drill, Adam, I'll be on the same page:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] BeatpathWinner   Adam Tarr
• [EM] falsifying voters' rankings--no.   Adam Tarr
• [EM] AV used in Oshkosh, WI?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Acronyms   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Stephane's poll--let's go with it.   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Approval-Competed Condorcet... "more" strategy-free?   Adam Tarr
• ACC, more strategy-free?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: ACC, more strategy-free?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV in Australia (was How to Vote in Approval)   Adam Tarr
• Approval in E Europe [was IRV...; was ...Approval]   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Lincoln; Big money, gerrymanders, rotten EC, etc.   Adam Tarr
• The Allure of IRV   Adam Tarr
• Number Voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Approval Strategy (was the Allure of IRV)   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Doubts on Approval Strategy   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Majority Winners (was Ventura)   Adam Tarr
• [EM] AV used in Oshkosh, WI?   Jurij Toplak
• [EM] IRV in Australia (was How to Vote in Approval)   Jurij Toplak
• [EM] Access to voting booths   Arnold B. Urken
• [EM] Saari and Cyclic Ambiguities   Arnold B. Urken
• How to vote in Approval   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] New clones definition?   Joe Weinstein
• How to vote in Approval   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Action   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Fwd: Better election methods   Joe Weinstein
• Approval in E Europe [was IRV...; was ...Approval]   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Lincoln; Big money, gerrymanders, rotten EC, etc.   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] The Allure of IRV   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] I tried to register for the poll   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Optimal Approval strategy   Joe Weinstein
• The Allure of IRV   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Party Seats/ Proxy Proportional Representation System, 1 Apr 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] U.S.A. government elections, Seats Percentages versus Votes Percentages   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• U.S.A. government elections, Seats Percentages versus Vo tes Percentages   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Primary Votes of new U.S.A. Representatives and U.S.A. Senators, 2000 Election   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: New clones definition?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Voting Systems Standards Meetings, May 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Electoral Numbers Game Favors Bush For 2004 Election   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Interesting article   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 04/05/02 - I Know the Drill, Adam, I'll be on the same page   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] RE: Action   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Party Seats/ Proxy Proportional Representation Method, 8 Apr 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• AV used in Oshkosh, WI?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• falsifying voters' rankings--no.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Small Legislative Bodies Proportional Representation Method, 10 April 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Elisabeth's questions   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Plurality Worst Losers   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Action   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] The Rotted Electoral College (was Action)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Senate passes bill aimed at reforming elections   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Plurality Worst Losers   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 04/12/02 - Favorite is the Approval Winner:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• The Rotted Electoral College (was Action)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] 2000 POPULATIONS - 2000 PRESIDENT VOTES   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• the poll   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] U.S.A. GOVERNMENT, 2003-2005 PRELIMINARY MINORITY RULE MATH   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: ACC, more strategy-free?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Example Demorep requested   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• BC & PR   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Supreme Court Won't Rule on Vote-By-Mail   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] 1919 (Weimar) and 1949 Germany Constitutions   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 1919 (Weimar) and 1949 Germany Constitutions   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Midterm Candidates Raise Big Money   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] France President Election   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Lincoln; Big money, gerrymanders, rotten EC, etc.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Candidate Vote Transfer Proportional Representation Method, 20 April 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Candidate Vote Transfer Proportional Representation Method, 20 April 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Rural voters crucial in House election battle   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] France President election top 2 runoff   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Democratizing the Senate   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• The Allure of IRV...   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] U.S.A. Senate - more minority rule math   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] French system creates power struggle   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Number Voting?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Number Voting   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Britain tests early, high-tech voting   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Info to Newbies   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Gerrymander story- Economist   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• The Worse than Junk IRV method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] The Worse than Junk IRV method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Sum of Place Votes   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Forest's 3-bit approval method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: The Allure of IRV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Approval Strategy (was the Allure of IRV)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Bounded AV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] 2002 U.S.A. campaign finance law cases   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] RE: Gerrymander story- Economist   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Majority Winners (was Ventura)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Majority Winners (was Ventura)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Approval Voting Language - Executive and Judicial office candidates   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Elections 101 Basics   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Short P.R. Language 30 April 2002   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Action   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Action   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] TIME magazine   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Action   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] The Rotted Electoral College (was Action)   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• Re: [EM] The Rotted Electoral College (was Action)   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Lincoln; Big money, gerrymanders, rotten EC, etc.   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] The Allure of IRV...   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• re:[EM] The Allure of IRV   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• The Allure of IRV   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Announcement from Paul Hager   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• re: [EM] Announcement from Paul Hager   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Press Release from Paul Hager   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Bounded AV   hager2002 at lsh107.siteprotect.com
• [EM] Ali distribuirati   rdomr

Last message date: Tue Apr 30 23:35:45 PDT 2002
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:44 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...