March 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Mar 1 00:33:07 PST 2007
Ending: Sat Mar 31 22:35:06 PDT 2007
Messages: 386

• [EM] Professor Avi Rubin and American Idol election methods   Chris Backert
• [EM] UncAAO   Chris Benham
• [EM] UncAAO   Chris Benham
• [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.   Chris Benham
• [EM] UncAAO   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Power Truncation"?   Chris Benham
• [EM] very simple email poll   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")   Chris Benham
• [EM] UncAAO   Chris Benham
• [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC   Chris Benham
• [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC   Chris Benham
• [EM] All uncovered options may be definitely defeated   Chris Benham
• [EM] DAMC   Chris Benham
• [EM] Improved versions of those 3 examples   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")   Chris Benham
• [EM] What is FBC/SF   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris reply   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")   Chris Benham
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris reply   Chris Benham
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Chris Benham
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris, majority-rule, etc.   Chris Benham
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Chris Benham
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Chris: Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] A definition for your criteria system   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] More FARCS problems   Chris Benham
• [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Venzke system for applying criteria, "FARCS"   Chris Benham
• [EM] One example of a wording problem   Chris Benham
• [EM] Ehiquette   David Cary
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   David Cary
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   David Cary
• [EM] Pizza, Utilities, and Majority Criterion   David Cary
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   David Cary
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   David Cary
• [EM] Why is Bayesian Regret the "Gold Standard"   David Cary
• [EM] Two anagrams of "Hillary Rodham Clinton"   David Cary
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA   Matthijs van Duin
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA   Matthijs van Duin
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA   Matthijs van Duin
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Matthijs van Duin
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Matthijs van Duin
• [EM] UncAAO   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] UncAAO   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] very simple email poll   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] very simple email poll   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC analysis for two factions   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] D2MAC   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] All uncovered options may be definitely defeated (was: UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] UncDMC   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] DAMC (was: MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] DAMC meets reasonable FBC   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Beatpath(Unc, wv), a version of Beatpath that always picks from the Uncovered set   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] DAMC   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] DAMC   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Directional Resistance   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] PG-MPO   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Juho
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Juho
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Juho
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Juho
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Juho
• [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.   Juho
• [EM] Electronic voting in Estonia   Juho
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Juho
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Juho
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Juho
• [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")   Juho
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Juho
• [EM] D2MAC   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem   Juho
• [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")   Juho
• [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem   Juho
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Juho
• [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")   Juho
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Juho
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] Tree based Condorcet strategies   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Juho
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Juho
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Juho
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Juho
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Juho
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Juho
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Juho
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Juho
• [EM] very simple email poll   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] uses of truncation   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] uses of truncation   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] uses of truncation   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Greatest Majority Consent (GMC)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Path to a Proxy Legislature   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Getting the WHOLE Truth   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?   Jan Kok
• [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?   Jan Kok
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] very simple email poll   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Pizza, Utilities, and Majority Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] secession Was Re: it's pleocracy, not democracy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] uses of truncation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] uses of truncation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] uses of truncation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees and single-winner methods   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Path to a Proxy Legislature   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Trees by Proxy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Pitching Unity08 on "Preferential Voting"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Announcing OpenSTV 1.1   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Announcing OpenSTV 1.1   Brian Olson
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approaches to proposing Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Set-Voting   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Plurality has 4 times the inequality of voting power   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] UncAAO   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] UncAAO   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What is the idal method for sincere voters?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho--Strategy-resistance   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] My definitions can be found at the barnsdle website.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] This time margins is finished-off!   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] This time margins is finished-off!   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "Power Truncation"?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] More about why I withdraw power-truncation   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] I still recommend ARLO   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] But, for FBC, you'd leave ARLO out   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] How much strategy-freeness can be attained?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than RangeVoting (corrected)   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit ofutility?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Improved versions of those 3 examples   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] preliminary DAMC comments   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What is FBC/SF   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A way that DAMC might fail FBC (I'm not sure that it does)   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] DAMC meets reasonable FBC   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] FBCs   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] More re: FBCs   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris, majority-rule, etc.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Replies in advance   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Two anagrams of "Hillary Rodham Clinton"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Two anagrams of "Hillary Rodham Clinton"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A definition for your criteria system   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Problems of FARCS   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reply to Kevin's 21 February posing   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] More FARCS problems   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A definition for your criteria system   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Borrow sincere voting definition for FARC   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] RE : 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] FARCS: Be careful how you use it   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Brief final comments on FARCS   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Venzke system for applying criteria, "FARCS"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] One example of a wording problem   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] An objection that I hadn't spelled-out before   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Forest--EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?   Michael Poole
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Michael Poole
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Michael Poole
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Michael Poole
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting   Michael Poole
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Michael Poole
• [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Michael Poole
• [EM] Directional Resistance   Michael Poole
• [EM] Directional Resistance   Michael Poole
• [EM] Pitching Unity08 on "Preferential Voting"   Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Professor Avi Rubin and American Idol election methods   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] reply to venzke   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] SPPA presentation - 2007 MPSA Conference   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA   Markus Schulze
• [EM] UncAAO   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO defined in plain English   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] very simple email poll   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] very simple email poll   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Stronger than LIIA   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] D2MAC   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncDMC   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Beatpath(Unc, wv), a version of Beatpath that always picks from the Uncovered set   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] uses of truncation   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] uses of truncation   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] A natural variation on DMC   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] another example of using virtual candidates   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Directional Resistance   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Directional Resistance   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Greatest Majority Consent (GMC)   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Greatest Majority Consent   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] MAMPO variations   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] PG-MPO   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] final support   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] UncAAO   Warren Smith
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Warren Smith
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Warren Smith
• [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion   Warren Smith
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Warren Smith
• [EM] correction to correction   Warren Smith
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Warren Smith
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Warren Smith
• [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Warren Smith
• [EM] Implementing UncAAO, D2MAC, etc   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to venzke   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem   Warren Smith
• [EM] response to David Cary re Bayesian Regret   Warren Smith
• [EM] The history of utility theory, ideas, and flames   Warren Smith
• [EM] Utility, its math'l foundations & history   Warren Smith
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] Why is Bayesian Regret the "Gold Standard"   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] Quebec election - references...   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] Quebec election - references...   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?   Howard Swerdfeger
• [EM] For some action, follow Quebec election tonight   Elisabeth Varin
• [EM] Quebec election - references...   Elisabeth Varin
• [EM] Quebec election - references...   Elisabeth Varin
• [EM] very simple email poll   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : reply to venzke   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Chris: Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Criteria   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : More FARCS problems   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Greatest Majority Consent (GMC)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Greatest Majority Consent   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?   Matthew Welland
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] very simple email poll   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] secession Was Re: it's pleocracy, not democracy   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] weighted voters, success rate   heitzig-j at web.de
• [EM] weighted voters, success rate   heitzig-j at web.de

Last message date: Sat Mar 31 22:35:06 PDT 2007
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:33:01 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...