March 2007 Archives by author
Starting: Thu Mar 1 00:33:07 PST 2007
Ending: Sat Mar 31 22:35:06 PDT 2007
Messages: 386
- [EM] Professor Avi Rubin and American Idol election methods
Chris Backert
- [EM] UncAAO
Chris Benham
- [EM] UncAAO
Chris Benham
- [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.
Chris Benham
- [EM] UncAAO
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Power Truncation"?
Chris Benham
- [EM] very simple email poll
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")
Chris Benham
- [EM] UncAAO
Chris Benham
- [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC
Chris Benham
- [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC
Chris Benham
- [EM] All uncovered options may be definitely defeated
Chris Benham
- [EM] DAMC
Chris Benham
- [EM] Improved versions of those 3 examples
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")
Chris Benham
- [EM] What is FBC/SF
Chris Benham
- [EM] Chris reply
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")
Chris Benham
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Chris Benham
- [EM] Chris reply
Chris Benham
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Chris Benham
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Chris Benham
- [EM] Chris, majority-rule, etc.
Chris Benham
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Chris Benham
- [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA
Chris Benham
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Chris Benham
- [EM] Chris: Approval
Chris Benham
- [EM] A definition for your criteria system
Chris Benham
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Chris Benham
- [EM] More FARCS problems
Chris Benham
- [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Chris Benham
- [EM] Venzke system for applying criteria, "FARCS"
Chris Benham
- [EM] One example of a wording problem
Chris Benham
- [EM] Ehiquette
David Cary
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
David Cary
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
David Cary
- [EM] Pizza, Utilities, and Majority Criterion
David Cary
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
David Cary
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
David Cary
- [EM] Why is Bayesian Regret the "Gold Standard"
David Cary
- [EM] Two anagrams of "Hillary Rodham Clinton"
David Cary
- [EM] Stronger than LIIA
Matthijs van Duin
- [EM] Stronger than LIIA
Matthijs van Duin
- [EM] Stronger than LIIA
Matthijs van Duin
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Matthijs van Duin
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Matthijs van Duin
- [EM] UncAAO
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] UncAAO
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] very simple email poll
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] very simple email poll
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Stronger than LIIA
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC analysis for two factions
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] D2MAC
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] All uncovered options may be definitely defeated (was: UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] UncDMC
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] DAMC (was: MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] DAMC meets reasonable FBC
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Beatpath(Unc, wv), a version of Beatpath that always picks from the Uncovered set
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] DAMC
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] DAMC
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Directional Resistance
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] PG-MPO
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Juho
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Juho
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Juho
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Juho
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Juho
- [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.
Juho
- [EM] Electronic voting in Estonia
Juho
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Juho
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Juho
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Juho
- [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")
Juho
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Juho
- [EM] D2MAC
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem
Juho
- [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")
Juho
- [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem
Juho
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Juho
- [EM] "Possible Approval Winner" set/criterion (was "Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.")
Juho
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Juho
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] Tree based Condorcet strategies
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Juho
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Juho
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Juho
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Juho
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Juho
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Juho
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Juho
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Juho
- [EM] very simple email poll
Toplak Jurij
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] uses of truncation
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] uses of truncation
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] uses of truncation
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Greatest Majority Consent (GMC)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Path to a Proxy Legislature
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Getting the WHOLE Truth
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?
Jan Kok
- [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?
Jan Kok
- [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] RE : Re: When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] very simple email poll
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Pizza, Utilities, and Majority Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] secession Was Re: it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] uses of truncation
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] uses of truncation
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] uses of truncation
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees and single-winner methods
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Free Associations (was: Trees and single-winner methods)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Path to a Proxy Legislature
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Trees by Proxy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Pitching Unity08 on "Preferential Voting"
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Announcing OpenSTV 1.1
Jeffrey O'Neill
- [EM] Announcing OpenSTV 1.1
Brian Olson
- [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Approaches to proposing Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Set-Voting
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Plurality has 4 times the inequality of voting power
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] typo
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] UncAAO
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] typo
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] UncAAO
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] What is the idal method for sincere voters?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Juho--Strategy-resistance
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Juho--Margins fails Plurality. WV passes.
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] My definitions can be found at the barnsdle website.
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] This time margins is finished-off!
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] This time margins is finished-off!
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] "Power Truncation"?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] More about why I withdraw power-truncation
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] I still recommend ARLO
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] But, for FBC, you'd leave ARLO out
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] How much strategy-freeness can be attained?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than RangeVoting (corrected)
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit ofutility?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Improved versions of those 3 examples
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] preliminary DAMC comments
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Chris reply
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] What is FBC/SF
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] A way that DAMC might fail FBC (I'm not sure that it does)
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] DAMC meets reasonable FBC
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] FBCs
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] More re: FBCs
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Chris, majority-rule, etc.
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Replies in advance
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Two anagrams of "Hillary Rodham Clinton"
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Two anagrams of "Hillary Rodham Clinton"
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] A definition for your criteria system
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Problems of FARCS
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Reply to Kevin's 21 February posing
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] More FARCS problems
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] A definition for your criteria system
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Borrow sincere voting definition for FARC
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] RE : 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] FARCS: Be careful how you use it
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Brief final comments on FARCS
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Venzke system for applying criteria, "FARCS"
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] One example of a wording problem
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] An objection that I hadn't spelled-out before
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Forest--EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?
Michael Poole
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Michael Poole
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Michael Poole
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Michael Poole
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting
Michael Poole
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Michael Poole
- [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Michael Poole
- [EM] Directional Resistance
Michael Poole
- [EM] Directional Resistance
Michael Poole
- [EM] Pitching Unity08 on "Preferential Voting"
Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] What is the ideal election method for sincere voters?
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] Professor Avi Rubin and American Idol election methods
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] reply to venzke
Scott Ritchie
- [EM] SPPA presentation - 2007 MPSA Conference
Stephane Rouillon
- [EM] Stronger than LIIA
Markus Schulze
- [EM] UncAAO
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncAAO
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncAAO
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncAAO
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncAAO defined in plain English
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] very simple email poll
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] very simple email poll
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] Stronger than LIIA
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] MDDA vs UncAAO, ASM & DMC
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] D2MAC
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncAAO, DMC, ASM, and TACC
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncDMC
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] Beatpath(Unc, wv), a version of Beatpath that always picks from the Uncovered set
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] uses of truncation
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] uses of truncation
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] A natural variation on DMC
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] another example of using virtual candidates
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] Directional Resistance
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] Directional Resistance
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] Greatest Majority Consent (GMC)
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] Greatest Majority Consent
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] MAMPO variations
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] PG-MPO
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] final support
Forest W Simmons
- [EM] UncAAO
Warren Smith
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Warren Smith
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Warren Smith
- [EM] Matthijs van Duin criterion
Warren Smith
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Warren Smith
- [EM] correction to correction
Warren Smith
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Warren Smith
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Warren Smith
- [EM] D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Warren Smith
- [EM] Implementing UncAAO, D2MAC, etc
Warren Smith
- [EM] reply to venzke
Warren Smith
- [EM] reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem
Warren Smith
- [EM] response to David Cary re Bayesian Regret
Warren Smith
- [EM] The history of utility theory, ideas, and flames
Warren Smith
- [EM] Utility, its math'l foundations & history
Warren Smith
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] Why is Bayesian Regret the "Gold Standard"
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] Quebec election - references...
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] Quebec election - references...
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] Mae West was interested in voting methods?
Howard Swerdfeger
- [EM] For some action, follow Quebec election tonight
Elisabeth Varin
- [EM] Quebec election - references...
Elisabeth Varin
- [EM] Quebec election - references...
Elisabeth Varin
- [EM] very simple email poll
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : D2MAC can be much more efficient than Range Voting (corrected)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : reply to venzke
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : reply to venzke - range "random skewing" effect is not a problem
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Re: Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Chris: Approval
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Criteria
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : More FARCS problems
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : 22 March, 1435 GMT, Chris: Approval
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] MAMPO is probably better than MDDA
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Greatest Majority Consent (GMC)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Re: Greatest Majority Consent
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] RE : Re: EQTOP-MPO MAMPO example
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Are proposed methods asymptotically aproaching some limit of utility?
Matthew Welland
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
raphfrk at netscape.net
- [EM] very simple email poll
raphfrk at netscape.net
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
raphfrk at netscape.net
- [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
raphfrk at netscape.net
- [EM] secession Was Re: it's pleocracy, not democracy
raphfrk at netscape.net
- [EM] divided house problem of close vote (50%+1)
raphfrk at netscape.net
- [EM] weighted voters, success rate
heitzig-j at web.de
- [EM] weighted voters, success rate
heitzig-j at web.de
Last message date:
Sat Mar 31 22:35:06 PDT 2007
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:33:01 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).