[EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
abd at lomaxdesign.com
Mon Mar 5 22:36:13 PST 2007
At 06:00 AM 3/5/2007, Jobst Heitzig wrote:
>Do you mean to say that the will of a consistent faction of 49% of the
>electorate, who will never get their way under a majoritarian system,
>is "noise"??
No. But that condition is essentially impossible. There is *never* a
consistent faction of that size in a majoritarian democracy, indeed,
I think I wrote, there is no faction of *any* size of which this is
true, since the vast majority of choices made in real societies enjoy
almost total consensus.
Let me put it this way. I've worked as a prison chaplain.
Even thieves believe that theft is wrong. I never met one who thought
it should be legalized.
They may think that they, personally, were justified in some way, but
that's another matter.
So when you are talking about a faction which "will never get their
way," you are talking about a narrow subset of the choices that the
society makes, those which are controversial.
And there is no consistency about this. Everyone wins sometimes and
loses sometimes. Everyone.
The "noise" was introducing some random process whereby collective
decisions were sometimes made against the will and without the
permission of the majority. That random process is the noise.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list