February 2004 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Feb 1 00:02:01 PST 2004
Ending: Sun Feb 29 17:50:05 PST 2004
Messages: 271

• [EM] Educative Alternative Voting board...   Anguo
• [EM] Educative Alternative Voting board...   Anguo
• [EM] poll fever   Anguo
• [EM] Complete ballot, posted without all the extra discussion. Voting week starts now   Ma Anguo
• [EM] Agora poll website   Ma Anguo
• [EM] my ballot.   Ma Anguo
• [EM] Real usage of my site   Ma Anguo
• [EM] Ignorance   Ma Anguo
• [EM] In effect and in voting theory, Plurality is a rankings method. (Supplementary Vote)   Steve Barney
• [EM] Plurality (aka FPP) meets "minimal defense" criterion??   Chris Benham
• [EM] In effect and in voting theory, Plurality is a rankings method.   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Ranked Ossipoff Choice" is not a voting method   Chris Benham
• [EM] Reverse - Symetrical Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Reverse - Symetrical Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Quota Limited Weighted Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Quota Limited Weighted Approval (oops! reference to Margins was wrong)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Butt off OSSIPOFF: can't Lanphier expell him ?   Craig Carey
• [EM] Markus: You still haven't defined "prefer". So your criteria remain undefined.   Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: Richard's criteria   Craig Carey
• Online MAM tallying server (was Re: [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates)   Steve Eppley
• Online MAM tallying server (was Re: [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates)   Steve Eppley
• minimal defense & SDSC (was Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner doesn't fail Markus' "SDSC".)   Steve Eppley
• Handling write-ins & typos (was Re: Online MAM tallying server (was Re: [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates))   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Two concerns about EM's presidential poll   Steve Eppley
• [EM] SciAm article   Steve Eppley
• [EM] SciAm article   Steve Eppley
• Collective & individual "rationality" (was Re: [EM] Real usage of my site)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Some terminology standardization suggestions   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Regarding the poll   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Extremely simple voting for committee   James Gilmour
• [EM] In effect and in voting theory, Plurality is a rankings method. (Supplementary Vote)   James Gilmour
• [EM] In effect and in voting theory, Plurality is a rankings method. (Supplementary Vote)   James Gilmour
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   James Gilmour
• [EM] cluster analysis   James Gilmour
• [EM] I did reply to Craig's e-mail   Eric Gorr
• [EM] More Site updates   Eric Gorr
• [EM] eBooks   Eric Gorr
• [EM] eBooks - naming   Eric Gorr
• [EM] eBooks - naming - MAM-d   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Chris' ranked Plurality fails Markus' copied criterion   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV/MMV & MAM-d   Eric Gorr
• Online MAM tallying server (was Re: [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates)   Eric Gorr
• Online MAM tallying server (was Re: [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] SciAm article   Eric Gorr
• [EM] The ballot   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Site Update   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Real usage of my site   Eric Gorr
• Collective & individual "rationality" (was Re: [EM] Real usage of my site)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] PHPSurveyor   Eric Gorr
• [EM] offense and defense   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Educative Alternative Voting board...   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] FBC wording   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] poll fever   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] mayor of London   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] NES, DSV, & SMA = ?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Ballot for Poll. Voting period starts now.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Nominations for presidential poll   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Meaning of preference   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Ken Johnson
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #520 - 13 msgs]   Ken Johnson
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Ken Johnson
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Extremely simple voting for committee   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: Multi-Winner Approval Strategy   Gervase Lam
• [EM] poll fever   Gervase Lam
• [EM] poll fever   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Nominations for presidential poll   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Nominations for presidential poll   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Minimally improving Approval   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Butt off OSSIPOFF: can't Lanphier expell him ?   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Nominations for presidential poll   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] SciAm article   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] SciAm article   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] 3 ways of writing certain criteria   Richard Moore
• [EM] "Sincere preferences" considered superfluous   Richard Moore
• [EM] Richard's criteria   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Richard's criteria   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Richard's criteria   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Richard's criteria   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #502 - 8 msgs   Richard Moore
• [EM] My ballot   Richard Moore
• [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates   Andrew Myers
• [EM] pSTV v0.3   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The company Approval election of committee-members   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Floyd algorithm?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Multi-Winner Approval Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Defensive Strategy Definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Strrategy definitions clarification   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criteria that don't mention preferences?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criteria that don't mention preferences?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: I did reply to Craig   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave Gamble reply, 2/2/04   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Matt's terminology changes   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Your votes-only criterion is not equivalent to SDSC.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] BeatpathWinner fails Markus' "SDSC".   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus' goal is attainable, & Dave had a point, but....   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus' "SDSC" isn't Steve's version. It's Markus' alleged SDSC-equivalent.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: My posting replied to a claim that you'd just made.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Multiwinner Approval Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Long Term CR Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Allow equal ranking   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] This is what I'm talking about: Your suggestion to replace SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The criterion you suggested is inconsistent with your "motivation" for it.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Partial points in CR   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Here's what I mean with "your error":   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Plurality & Markus' copied criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris' ranked Plurality fails Markus' copied criterion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Ranked Ossipoff Choice (ROC) method   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 3 ways of writing certain criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin reply 2/9/04 0945 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris reply, 9 Feb. '04, 1048 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus reply, 9 Feb., 1108 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: wv & Approval vs IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I nominate SSD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, those aren't the kind of criteria that you said you like.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Steph, Re: poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Regarding the poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Votes-only FBC definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "Preference" can mean anything?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Automatic Equal Ranking Line Option for Poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Poll details   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: You still haven't defined "prefer". So your criteria remain undefined.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Richard's criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Automatic Equal Ranking Line Option for Poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A small change in the automatic ranking line option definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Further comments on Richard's criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Richard reply, 13 Feb, 1112 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 2nd Richard reply on 13 Feb, GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus reply 13 Feb 1140 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Minimal Improvements on Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Richard reply, 14/2/04, 1142 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Sci.Am article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Preferences are not transitive   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Borda typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A few Richard replies   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Improved automatic dropping line option   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Meaning of preference   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Richard reply, 16 February, 1020 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] DSV, NES, & SMA   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Possible advantage of NES (& maybe DSV) over wv with AERLO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ballot for Poll. Voting period starts now.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Methods for counting presidential poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] My ballot   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] My ballot   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Add Bush to your ballot   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Correcting an error in my ballot 17 February 1130 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Presidential Poll Objections   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Missed nominations. Poll issues.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Agora poll website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Complete Ballot. Voting week starts now.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Complete ballot, posted without all the extra discussion. Voting week starts now   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] My ballot   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Previous ballot omitted Bush. This ballot is complete.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Minor correction of a statement   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The SciAm article isn't as bad as I'd feared it was   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Sorry--_This_ ballot has Bush, Badnarik, Weslely Clark, & is correct & complete   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SciAm article. Advantages of many candidates in poll.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Neatening-up my vote, 21 February, 1011 GMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Criteria that don't mention preferences?   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV/MMV & MAM-d   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Deterministic MAM (Majority Preference Voting)   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] SciAm article   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] SciAm article. Advantages of many candidates in poll.   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] SciAm article. Advantages of many candidates in poll.   Ernest Prabhakar
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Ernest Prabhakar
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Ernest Prabhakar
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Ernest Prabhakar
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Ernest Prabhakar
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] poll fever   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Nominations for presidential poll   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] my ballot - 21/02/2004   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Educative Alternative Voting board...   Olli Salmi
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Ossipoff's lost 8 proofs now supplied by Adam Tarr Re: [EM] Clarifying the definitions   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Clarifying the definitions   Markus Schulze
• [EM] I did reply to Craig's e-mail   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Floyd algorithm?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] I did reply to Craig's e-mail   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Criteria that don't mention preferences?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] I did reply to Craig   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Your votes-only criterion is not equivalent to SDSC.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] BeatpathWinner doesn't fail Markus' "SDSC".   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus' "SDSC" isn't Steve's version. It's Markus' alleged SDSC-equivalent.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] This is what I'm talking about: Your suggestion to replace SDSC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The criterion you suggested is inconsistent with your "motivation" for it.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] ranked methods   Markus Schulze
• [EM] 3 ways of writing certain criteria   Markus Schulze
• [EM] 3 ways of writing certain criteria   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, those aren't the kind of criteria that you said you like.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Preference" can mean anything?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: You still haven't defined "prefer". So your criteria remain undefined.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: You still haven't defined "prefer". So your criteria remain undefined.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] minimal defense & SDSC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] SciAm article   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Preferences are not transitive   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #520 - 13 msgs]   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Voter Space Borda (VSB)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Criteria that don't mention preferences?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Voter Space Methods, and Antidote to Clone Sensitivity   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Voter Space Methods, and Antidote to Clone Sensitivity   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Semantic point   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Voter Space Borda (VSB)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] VSB fails the Majority Criterion   Forest Simmons
• [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates   Forest Simmons
• [EM] VSB fails the Majority Criterion AND monotonicity   Forest Simmons
• [EM] FBC wording   Forest Simmons
• [EM] poll fever   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Regarding the poll   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Minimally improving Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] SciAm article   Forest Simmons
• [EM] SciAm article   Forest Simmons
• [EM] SciAm article   Forest Simmons
• [EM] my ballot   Forest Simmons
• [EM] my ballot   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Reverse - Symetrical Weighted Median Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another 3-slot method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Forest Simmons
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Minimally improving Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] cluster analysis   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Why the "jury" approach is right for large public elections   Forest Simmons
• [EM] cluster analysis   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Why the "jury" approach is right for large public elections   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Long Term CR strategy   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Long Term CR Strategy   Alex Small
• [EM] I Propose an EM Poll on Presidential Candidates   Alex Small
• [EM] SciAm article   Alex Small
• [EM] My ballot   Rob Speer
• [EM] Some terminology standardization suggestions   Adam Tarr
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Adam Tarr
• [EM] electoral methods - US and Europe   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Adam Tarr
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Adam Tarr
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Adam Tarr
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Adam Tarr
• CR == Approval? Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs   Adam Tarr
• [EM] ranked methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Kevin reply, FBC wording   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] FBC wording   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Minimally improving Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] simulation of Approval, Schulze, and sincere utility   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Minimal Improvements on Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Minimally improving Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] SciAm article   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] My Ballot   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Ossipoff's Off Again!!!!   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Poll Madness!!!   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] My Ballot   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV   Niemzinski at ecybermind.net
• [EM] Chris' ranked Plurality fails Markus' copied criterion   james mehigan
• [EM] Ballot for Poll. Voting period starts now.   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] Some terminology standardization suggestions   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Some terminology standardization suggestions   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Majority Approval or Dual Dropping Preference   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   wclark at xoom.org

Last message date: Sun Feb 29 17:50:05 PST 2004
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:23 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...