[EM] Markus, those aren't the kind of criteria that you said you like.

[MIKE OSSIPOFF]

Markus,

You said:

I propose the following criterion as an alternative to FBC:

   Each voter must be allowed to vote as many alternatives
   tied for top as he wishes. Suppose Q1 is the number of
   voters who strictly prefer at least one candidate to
   candidate A. Suppose Q2 is the number of voters who
   strictly prefer candidate A to candidate B. Suppose
   Q1 < Q2. Then candidate B must be elected with zero
   probability.

I reply:

Markus, referring to the above, and also to your subsequently posted 
criteria: You said that you don't like criteria that mention voters' 
preferences, and that you only like criteria that only mention voted 
ballots.

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Plan your next US getaway to one of the super destinations here. 
http://special.msn.com/local/hotdestinations.armx