[EM] "Preference" can mean anything?

[Markus Schulze]

Dear Mike,

I suggest that you should read how other people define
criteria. My criterion #1 implies e.g. Eppley's non-drastic
defense criterion. My criterion #2 implies e.g. Eppley's
minimal defense criterion and Woodall's plurality criterion:

http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~seppley
http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~seppley/Proof%20MAM%20satisfies%20Minimal%20Defense%20and%20Truncation%20Resistance.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/election-methods-list/files/wood1994.pdf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/election-methods-list/files/wood1996.pdf

Markus Schulze