[EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV

[Markus Schulze]

Dear Mike,

I wrote (31 Jan 2004):
> For Ernest's proposal, I suggest terms like "Smith-MinMax"
> or "Smith-Simpson-Kramer".

You wrote (1 Feb 2004):
> Simpson-Kramer doesn't resemble PC. I refer Markus to the
> _Journal of Economic Perspective_, for Winter '95. It's been
> a long time since I looked at that article, but it seems to
> me that Simpson-Kramer is based a candidate's votes-for in
> pairwise-comparisons, without distinguishing between the
> candidate's defeats and his victories.

Actually, I am not even aware that Simpson and Kramer
discussed incomplete individual preferences.

Markus Schulze