March 2004 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Mar 1 03:39:11 PST 2004
Ending: Wed Mar 31 21:25:02 PST 2004
Messages: 298

• [EM] better, easier condorcet voting   Ma Anguo
• Truncated preferences OK for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance)   Ma Anguo
• [EM] Approval meets IIA ?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Another IRV failure   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Majority Criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Quota Limited Weighted Approval PR   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: please read a quick question about Condorcet   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: ERIRV(fractional) with AERLO meets SDSC   Chris Benham
• [EM] Introductory Message   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Introductory Message   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Introductory Message   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Clarification of term   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Clarification of term   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #552 - 6 msgs   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #552 - 6 msgs   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Response to Kevin Venzke's response   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Response to Kevin Venzke's response   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Re: Re: non-binding direct democracy system   Doreen Dotan
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Steve Eppley
• Arrow's axioms (was Re: [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #525 - 9 msgs])   Steve Eppley
• IPDA criterion (was Re: [EM] Approval meets IIA?)   Steve Eppley
• Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance)   Steve Eppley
• Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance)   Steve Eppley
• Manually counting IRV (was RE: Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance))   Steve Eppley
• Manually counting IRV (was RE: Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance))   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: [Fwd: approval voting and majority criterion]   Steve Eppley
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Philippe Errembault
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   James Gilmour
• Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance)   James Gilmour
• Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance)   James Gilmour
• Manually counting IRV (was RE: Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance))   James Gilmour
• Manually counting IRV (was RE: Truncated preferences ok for Condorcet (was Re: [EM] Ignorance))   James Gilmour
• [EM] Real Ballot Data & Analysis   James Gilmour
• [EM] Real Ballot Data & Analysis   James Gilmour
• [EM] Real Ballot Data & Analysis   James Gilmour
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   James Gilmour
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   James Gilmour
• [EM] Another IRV failure   James Gilmour
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   James Gilmour
• [EM] Approval and PR (was Request for help: complex election)   James Gilmour
• [EM] Introductory Message   James Gilmour
• [EM] Introductory Message   James Gilmour
• [EM] Introductory Message   James Gilmour
• [EM] Clarification of term : District Magnitude   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   James Gilmour
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   James Gilmour
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   James Gilmour
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   James Gilmour
• [EM] Gilmour, sincere rankings.   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV - disincentives   James Gilmour
• [EM] Survey Results   Eric Gorr
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Berkeley passes IRV   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Real Ballot Data & Analysis   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Real Ballot Data & Analysis   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Real Ballot Data & Analysis   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Site Updates   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Another IRV failure   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Another IRV failure   Eric Gorr
• [EM] ICC & IRV   Eric Gorr
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: approval voting and majority criterion]   Eric Gorr
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: approval voting and majority criterion]   Eric Gorr
• [EM] ICC & IRV   Eric Gorr
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Eric Gorr
• [EM] More Ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Any Condorcet/Approval Method supporters in IL?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] More on the FSCC ballots   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   Eric Gorr
• [EM] equal rankings IRV (was: Approval vs ??)   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV - disincentives   Eric Gorr
• [EM] my ballot   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Strong FBC--This time it's personal! ; )   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Introductory Message   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] approval voting and majority criterion   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Majority Criterion, actually Mutual Majority Criterion (MMC)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] equal rankings IRV (was: Approval vs ??)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] equal rankings IRV   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] self-promotion / helpfulness part I   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] the link to my new web page   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] terms for strategies: compression and reversal   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] ERBuckliln(whole) with AERLO meets Strong FBC   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval & CR are 2nd best, after Condorcet wv.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Elections methods performance criterion   Bart Ingles
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Introductory Message   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Introductory Message   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Introductory Message   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Majority Criterion   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Majority Criterion, actually Mutual Majority Criterion (MMC)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Approval vs ??   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Argument for Approval Primaries   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Primaries?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Primaries?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #525 - 9 msgs]   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Approval meets IIA ?   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: Arrow's axioms   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Elections methods performance criterion [was Arrow's axioms]   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Elections methods performance criterion   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Elections methods performance criterion   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Introductory Message   Ken Johnson
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: approval voting and majority criterion]   Ken Johnson
• [EM] approval voting and majority criterion   Ken Johnson
• [Fwd: Re: [EM] [Fwd: Re: approval voting and majority criterion]]   Ken Johnson
• [EM] approval voting and majority criterion   Ken Johnson
• [EM] approval voting and majority criterion   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Ken Johnson
• [EM] monotonicity   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Re: another idea (proportionality and intra-party competition)   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Strong FBC--This time it's personal! ; )   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Introductory Message   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Email standards:   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Primaries?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze efficiency)   Jan Kok
• [EM] Approval and PR (was Request for help: complex election)   Jan Kok
• [EM] Re: Arrow's axioms   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Condorcet, Weber and Info   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: Condorcet, Weber and Info   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: another idea (proportionality and intra-party competition)   Gervase Lam
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Richard Moore
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze "efficiency)   Richard Moore
• [EM] Primaries? (a PR Condorcet proposal)   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Nikhil Nair
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Nikhil Nair
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Nikhil Nair
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Nikhil Nair
• [EM] The CR example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs ??   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Rankings made by another method   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Majority Criterion, actually Mutual Majority Criterion (MMC)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Falsifying voters' rankings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Equal Rankings IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ERIRV(fractional) doesn't fail WDSC in Markus' example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Gilmour, sincere rankings.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo: "falsify", not "reverse"   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ERBuckliln(whole) with AERLO meets Strong FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ERIRV(fractional) with AERLO meets SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval & CR are 2nd best, after Condorcet wv.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC, nonpairwise AERLO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #573 - 4 msgs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Marcos C. Ribeiro
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Marcos C. Ribeiro
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Marcos C. Ribeiro
• [EM] Introductory Message   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] STV relatively rare flaws   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Approval meets IIA ?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Markus Schulze
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Markus Schulze
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Israel, Switzerland...   Markus Schulze
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   Markus Schulze
• [EM] non-binding direct democracy system   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Equal Rankings IRV   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Equal Rankings IRV   Markus Schulze
• Arrow's axioms (was Re: [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #525 - 9 msgs])   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Forest Simmons
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Forest Simmons
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: approval voting and majority criterion]   Forest Simmons
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Majority Criterion   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A Ballot Space Method Based on CR Ballots   Forest Simmons
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] please read quick question about Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Grade Voting revisited   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Primaries?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval & CR are 2nd best; Approval STV   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: non-binding direct democracy system   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Strong FBC--This time it's personal! ; )   Alex Small
• [EM] Strong FBC Yet Again--This time it's personal! ;)   Alex Small
• [EM] Strong FBC--This time it's personal! ; )   Alex Small
• [EM] dissatisfying Strong FBC methods   Alex Small
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Alex Small
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Elections methods performance criterion   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Request for help: complex election   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Primaries?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Primaries?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Primaries?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Primaries?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Primaries?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Another IRV failure   Ken Taylor
• [EM] {Spam?} reform electoral for Ecuador   Diego Tello
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze efficiency)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Arrow's axioms   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] hand-counting IRV, AER   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze efficiency)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze "efficiency)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze efficiency)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] dissatisfying Strong FBC methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ICC & IRV   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval failing Majority in a likely way   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Israel, Switzerland...   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Israel, Switzerland...   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] approval voting and majority criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] What do you think of "List Approval"?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] A method for those now seated (was "List Approval")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] STV can be hand counted...   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] another idea (proportionality and intra-party competition)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] equal rankings IRV (was: Approval vs ??)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: another idea (proportionality and intra-party competition)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Primaries   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval & CR are 2nd best; Approval STV   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval & CR are 2nd best; Approval STV   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] G-S theorem and random ballot   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Re: non-binding direct democracy system   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] NYT: Trustworthy voting systems   Niemzinski at ecybermind.net
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Niemzinski at ecybermind.net
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Niemzinski at ecybermind.net
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Niemzinski at ecybermind.net
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   Niemzinski at ecybermind.net
• [EM] the Election-methods at electorama.com mailing list   hamdan faouri
• [EM] ICC & IRV   atarr at purdue.edu
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   atarr at purdue.edu
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   atarr at purdue.edu
• [EM] Different electoral systems   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] IRV - disincentives   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] District continuity preserving re-districting   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Real IRV Ranked Ballots   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Suggested Poll [WAS: Re: Arrow's axioms]   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Simulation results (Approval, utility, Schulze efficiency)   wclark at xoom.org
• Arrow's axioms (was Re: [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #525 - 9 msgs])   wclark at xoom.org
• Arrow's axioms (was Re: [EM] Re: [Fwd: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #525 - 9 msgs])   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Arrow's axioms   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] approval voting and majority criterion   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: approval voting and majority criterion]   wclark at xoom.org

Last message date: Wed Mar 31 21:25:02 PST 2004
Archived on: Thu Jan 8 17:24:22 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...