[EM] Re: Condorcet, Weber and Info
Gervase Lam
gervase.lam at group.force9.co.uk
Mon Mar 8 17:14:29 PST 2004
> From: Gervase Lam
> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:59:27 +0000
> Subject: [EM] Condorcet, Weber and Info
> All that
> needs to be known is whether you think one candidate is better than
> another. However, I get the feeling that Utilities will matter more the
> more complicated the scenario.
The last sentence is "wrong". Using Weber's formula and methodolgy always
results in a ballot matrix that is exactly the same as the voter's sincere
ranking.
This is caused by the Ui - Uj term in the Weber formula Pi * Pj * (Ui -
Uj). If the voter sincerely would rank candidate I higher than candidate
J, then the difference is positive. If the voter sincerely would rank
candidate I lower than candidate J, then the difference is negative. This
produces a "Weber matrix" that is a mixture of positive and negative
numbers.
As a result, the most suitable ballot matrix will always zero out the
negative numbers. The positive numbers will always be kept. A positive
number means that candidate I has been sincerely ranked above candidate J.
Therefore, the ballot matrix will always equal the voter's sincere
ranking.
Thanks,
Gervase.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list