[EM] Arrow's axioms & an alternative to elections
Ernest Prabhakar
drernie at mac.com
Wed Mar 10 09:20:02 PST 2004
Hi Philippe,
On Mar 9, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Philippe Errembault wrote:
> hmmmm... Now that I re-read the text, I realise that your problem
> about decision
> taking and collapsing alternatives, probably came from here:
Actually, it was along the lines of 'forcing linear' decisions, by
analogy with the way that quantum states evolve smoothly over time
until a measurement is made. That is, human individuals (and
societies) are rarely in coherent states -- being a mass of conflicting
and inconsistent thoughts and desires -- but at various points in times
we still need to resolve them into decisions. You sounded like you
are trying to avoid the need for such decisions, but perhaps that was
an overstatement on my part.
Anyway, I've probably confused myself along with everyone else, so I'll
drop that line of thought....
> My proposition was
> mostly intended for people representation, mostly at parlementary
> level.
> Executive decisions are not taken at that level... As you said, if we
> want a leadership,
> we probably will need another kind of process for executive decisions.
Okay, if we're talking about legislatures, then perhaps I could
interpret your proposal as allowing dynamic self-assembling 'districts'
of interest which in turn form smoothly varying hierarchies of decision
making. WIth various actual legislative decisions made on different
levels at varying timescales, rather than the two-tier (representatives
vs. full referendum) that we tend to have now.
It certainly offers an interesting alternative to geographical
districting and periodic elections, and so would perhaps appeal to
those who like Proportional Representation.
The biggest problem I see is, who gets to define the rules for what
gets decided at which level? If the authority for that is too
dispersed, you get a logjam. If too centralized, you risk devaluing
certain levels which would seemingly defeat the whole purpose of the
arrangement.
-- Ernie P.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list