[EM] G-S theorem and random ballot
Alex Small
asmall at physics.ucsb.edu
Thu Mar 18 13:56:03 PST 2004
Joe Weinstein said:
> Theres more. Consider a jurisdiction dominated by a single political
> party which in turn is dominated by one or a few party bosses. Or,
> suppose - as here in California - the major parties agree on
> safe-district redistricting plans which preserve advantages to
> incumbents and to locally majority parties. In either case, a sexy
> non-random non-dictatorial method will nicely suit the actual
> dictator(s), whereas an unsexy random dictator method will frustrate
> them.
When you put it in terms of California's ultra-gerrymandered legislative
districts, your idea of making political offices more like jury duty
starts to make a LOT more sense to me. A whole lot more sense. It might
not be the ideal system, but it sure beats the current one.
I sure wouldn't mind getting called up for legislative duty.
"The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Santa Barbara."
"Thank-you, Mr. Speaker. I'd like to once again introduce a bill for the
legalization of all victimless crimes, and use my remaining time to argue
on its behalf..."
Alex
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list