June 2013 Archives by author
Starting: Sat Jun 1 13:44:16 PDT 2013
Ending: Sun Jun 30 20:13:53 PDT 2013
Messages: 280
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Michael Allan
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Michael Allan
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]
Chris Benham
- [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots
Chris Benham
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Chris Benham
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Chris Benham
- [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Chris Benham
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Chris Benham
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Chris Benham
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Chris Benham
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
- [EM] Subject: Here's what a random IRV election looks like
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Jon's article "The Second Most Important Electoral Reform"
Richard Fobes
- [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales
Richard Fobes
- [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales
Richard Fobes
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Richard Fobes
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Richard Fobes
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
James Gilmour
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] List question
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] List question
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] A dissent for Ben
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Shout out of thanks
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] List issues?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] List issues?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8924] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] All systems of voting are probably deeply flawed
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8955] Re: Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8957] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] [CES #8970] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing*
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long)
Benjamin Grant
- [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Andy Jennings
- [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Andy Jennings
- [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Andy Jennings
- [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV
Alexander Kjäll
- [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] List issues?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Is it professional?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Is it professional?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
- [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Rob Lanphier
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Rob Lanphier
- [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Approval & MMC, contd.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Quod non erat demonstrandum?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Focus of runoffs?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8782] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8816] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8834] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8843] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8844] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8854] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8973] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] [CES #8982] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Evaluative Majority Approval Voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing*
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] In political elections C (in terms of serious candidates w. an a priori strong chance of election) will never get large!
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Focus of runoffs?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Monetized score voting
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing*
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Jameson is repeating already-answered arguments
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Approval & MMC, contd.
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] Quod non erat demonstrandum?
Michael Ossipoff
- [EM] The chicken dilemma, median systems, and the pivotal voter
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8565] Re: The chicken dilemma, median systems, and the pivotal voter
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8790] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Absolutely new here
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] List question
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] A dissent for Ben
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8845] Re: MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] [CES #8972] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] EMAV?
Jameson Quinn
- [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV
Markus Schulze
- [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales
Warren D Smith
- [EM] Monetized score voting
Warren D Smith
- [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems
Warren D Smith
- [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems
Warren D Smith
- [EM] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems
Warren D Smith
- [EM] Here's what a random IRV election looks like
Warren D Smith
- [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls)
Warren D Smith
- [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls)
Warren D Smith
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
- [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
- [EM] The chicken dilemma, median systems, and the pivotal voter
Warren D. Smith (CRV cofounder, http://RangeVoting.org)
- [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls)
Warren D. Smith (CRV cofounder, http://RangeVoting.org)
- [EM] Re to Ben Grant's first post.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] A dissent for Ben
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Jameson
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Why Random by itself doesn't cut it.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] random eg w. improved version of IRV3.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] re James Gilmour
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] a re: Warren Smith's surveys.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] A candidate winning multiple seats.
David L Wetzell
- [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason.
David L Wetzell
Last message date:
Sun Jun 30 20:13:53 PDT 2013
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:36:03 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).