June 2013 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Jun 1 13:44:16 PDT 2013
Ending: Sun Jun 30 20:13:53 PDT 2013
Messages: 280

• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Michael Allan
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Michael Allan
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]   Chris Benham
• [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots   Chris Benham
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Chris Benham
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Chris Benham
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Chris Benham
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Chris Benham
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Chris Benham
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Chris Benham
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Chris Benham
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Chris Benham
• [EM] Subject: Here's what a random IRV election looks like   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Jon's article "The Second Most Important Electoral Reform"   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] List question   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] List question   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] A dissent for Ben   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Shout out of thanks   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] List issues?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] List issues?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Is it professional?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8924] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] All systems of voting are probably deeply flawed   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Is it professional?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8955] Re: Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8957] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] [CES #8970] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing*   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long)   Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Andy Jennings
• [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Andy Jennings
• [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Andy Jennings
• [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV   Alexander Kjäll
• [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] List issues?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Is it professional?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Is it professional?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Approval & MMC, contd.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Quod non erat demonstrandum?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Focus of runoffs?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8782] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8816] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8834] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8843] Re: MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8844] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8854] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8973] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [CES #8982] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Evaluative Majority Approval Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing*   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] In political elections C (in terms of serious candidates w. an a priori strong chance of election) will never get large!   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion [?]   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Focus of runoffs?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] A better 2-round method that uses approval ballots   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Monetized score voting   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Is it professional?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Is it professional?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Is it professional?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Is it professional?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing*   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Jameson is repeating already-answered arguments   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approval & MMC, contd.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Quod non erat demonstrandum?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The chicken dilemma, median systems, and the pivotal voter   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8565] Re: The chicken dilemma, median systems, and the pivotal voter   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual Majority Criterion   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Does Top Two Approval fail the Favorite Betrayal Criterion   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Electorama wiki requires login to view????   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Median systems, branding, and activism strategy   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8790] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Absolutely new here   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] List question   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] A dissent for Ben   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8845] Re: MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] [CES #8972] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MAV on electowiki   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] EMAV?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV   Markus Schulze
• [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Summary of psych/market-research studies of rating scales   Warren D Smith
• [EM] Monetized score voting   Warren D Smith
• [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems   Warren D Smith
• [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems   Warren D Smith
• [EM] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems   Warren D Smith
• [EM] Here's what a random IRV election looks like   Warren D Smith
• [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls)   Warren D Smith
• [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls)   Warren D Smith
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Vidar Wahlberg
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Vidar Wahlberg
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Vidar Wahlberg
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats   Vidar Wahlberg
• [EM] The chicken dilemma, median systems, and the pivotal voter   Warren D. Smith (CRV cofounder, http://RangeVoting.org)
• [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls)   Warren D. Smith (CRV cofounder, http://RangeVoting.org)
• [EM] Re to Ben Grant's first post.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] A dissent for Ben   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Jameson   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Why Random by itself doesn't cut it.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] random eg w. improved version of IRV3.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] re James Gilmour   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Is it professional?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] a re: Warren Smith's surveys.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] A candidate winning multiple seats.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason.   David L Wetzell

Last message date: Sun Jun 30 20:13:53 PDT 2013
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:36:03 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...