[EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)

[Benjamin Grant]

I guess (assuming I am allowed to duplicate ratings) I would call Additive
Approval Voting an E (if we are using ABCDEF) - I like it better than DAT
and IRAV, but less well than all the others.  If E is not allowed, I guess
flip a coin as to whether it gets a D or F.

 

On a side note, it's interesting how having this vote makes me more directly
aware of the voting system than thinking abstractly about it.

 

-Benn Grant

eFix Computer Consulting

 <mailto:benn at 4efix.com> benn at 4efix.com

603.283.6601

 

From: Jameson Quinn [mailto:jameson.quinn at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 3:04 PM
To: Benjamin Grant
Cc: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax; electionscience at googlegroups.com; election-methods
Subject: Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems,
branding....)

 

New running tally. Current voting tallies in parentheses, ordered
JQ/AL/RB/AJ/DSH/BG. Note the new option for Additive Approval Voting, which
could be a winner if Abd, Andy, and Ben like it enough. Current contenders
for best are in bold.

Instant Runoff Approval Voting: (B/A/F/C/F/F) Median C/F. 

Descending Approval Threshold Voting: (A/B-/B/C/C/F) Median B-/C. 

Majority Approval Voting: (A/?/C/A/A/D) Median A/C

Majority Support Voting: (B/?/C/A/C/D) Median C

Cumulative Approval Voting: (A/?/B/?/D/A) Median B/D

 

Additive Approval Voting: (B/?/B/?/B/?) Median B/?

Cumulative Support Voting: (A/?/B/?/F/C) Median C/?

 

Jameson

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20130617/7c38b5b1/attachment-0004.htm>