[EM] [CES #8816] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....)

[Abd ul-Rahman Lomax]

Additive Approval Voting is a reasonable name, but ... it misses the 
powerful and real associations with runoff voting, and we may find 
that the most powerful and ready application of the method is *in an 
existing runoff system.*

We could also call it "Runoff Approval Voting" to dump the "instant," 
which was a false promise. RAV. or ARV.

At 02:03 PM 6/17/2013, Jameson Quinn wrote:
>New running tally. Current voting tallies in parentheses, ordered 
>JQ/AL/RB/AJ/DSH/BG. Note the new option for Additive Approval 
>Voting, which could be a winner if Abd, Andy, and Ben like it 
>enough. Current contenders for best are in bold.
>
>Instant Runoff Approval Voting: (B/A/F/C/F/F) Median C/F.
>
>Descending Approval Threshold Voting: (A/B-/B/C/C/F) Median B-/C.
>
>Majority Approval Voting: (A/?/C/A/A/D) Median A/C
>
>Majority Support Voting: (B/?/C/A/C/D) Median C
>
>Cumulative Approval Voting: (A/?/B/?/D/A) Median B/D
>
>Additive Approval Voting: (B/?/B/?/B/?) Median B/?
>
>Cumulative Support Voting: (A/?/B/?/F/C) Median C/?
>
>Jameson
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>Groups "The Center for Election Science" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>send an email to electionscience+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit 
><https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>