[EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?

[Jameson Quinn]

2013/6/17 Benjamin Grant <benn at 4efix.com>

> *From:* Jameson Quinn [mailto:jameson.quinn at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 1:25 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can*
> work together after all?****
>
> ** **
>
> So to make a ranked example:****
>
> ** **
>
> 49: XpqYrstuabcdef****
>
> 49: XutYsrpqfedcba****
>
> 50: abcYXdefpqrstu****
>
> 50: fedYXcbautsrpq****
>
> ** **
>
> OK, Y wins this one.****
>
> ** **
>
> Add 4 votes:****
>
> 4: aXYbcdefpqrstu****
>
> ** **
>
> And now X wins this one.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> BUT I’m am still confused, Participation Criterion says: “*Adding one or
> more ballots that vote X over Y should never change the winner from X to Y
> *”  In this case the winner was NOT changed from X to Y, but from Y to X,
> so this is NOT an example of failing the Participation Criteria, is it?***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Am I missing something here?****
>
> **
>

Oops, typo on my part. The additional 4 votes should be aYXbcdefpqrstu.

Jameson

>  **
>
> -Benn Grant****
>
> eFix Computer Consulting****
>
> benn at 4efix.com****
>
> 603.283.6601****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20130617/c581742f/attachment-0004.htm>