[EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
wetzelld at gmail.com
Mon Jun 24 14:22:28 PDT 2013
Another might add, "This is why the number of competitive candidates and
the extent of low-info voters matters in the comparison".
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm <
km_elmet at lavabit.com> wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 09:33 PM, David L Wetzell wrote:
>> There should be a few more fewer ranks in the red in his example.
>> Also, I don't think voters care that much if their deeper preferences
>> aren't consulted when their top prefs get elected or come in 2nd place
>> and so it seems contrived to make a big deal out of it. This does get
>> at why little is lost when only 3 rankings are allowed with IRV, which
>> then makes it easier to use those rankings as approval votes for a first
>> round that reduces the number of candidates much more quickly.
> One man might say: "This does get at why little is lost when only 3
> rankings are allowed with IRV".
> The other man might say: "This does get at why full IRV is not much better
> than 3-candidate IRV".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Election-Methods