December 2011 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Dec 1 12:39:54 PST 2011
Ending: Sat Dec 31 14:29:43 PST 2011
Messages: 237

• [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics   Michael Allan
• [EM] Approval vs IRV   C.Benham
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   C.Benham
• [EM] Sorry--One more revision of MMT   C.Benham
• [EM] Complete MMT definition   C.Benham
• [EM] How to vote in IRV   C.Benham
• [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances.   C.Benham
• [EM] MMT2 meets FBC, fails Mono-Add-Plump, as it should.   C.Benham
• [EM] Oops! Forgot to include Chris's text. Chris MMT reply, complete this time.   C.Benham
• [EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set   C.Benham
• [EM] Forest: MAMT   C.Benham
• [EM] Forest: MAMT   C.Benham
• [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT   C.Benham
• [EM] voters "specifically" wronged by Mono-add-Plump failure   C.Benham
• [EM] Greatest-Mutual -Approval-Top (GMAT)   C.Benham
• [EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set   C.Benham
• [EM] Who wronged the A-plumpers   C.Benham
• [EM] ACF grade voting   C.Benham
• [EM] San Francisco considers getting rid of IRV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Egg or Chicken.   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Electoral experimentation   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Electoral Experimentation   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Electoral Experimentation   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Open-source VoteFair ranking software is now available   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Richard Fobes
• [EM] NP hardness cites for Kemeny   Richard Fobes
• [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics   James Gilmour
• [EM] Better Than Expectation Approval Voting (2nd try readable format)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Good references on voting theory   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs   Ross Hyman
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs   Ross Hyman
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs   Ross Hyman
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   Andy Jennings
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   Andy Jennings
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   Andy Jennings
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Andy Jennings
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] How to vote in IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Dave Ketchum: IRV strategy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   Jan Kok
• [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   Juho Laatu
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re to Kristof M   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer: Proxy DD   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Egg or Chicken.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] An opportunity cost-based approach for getting scores from social rankings   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Getting closer to the DPC while strongly summable.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Methods based on faction-size or hypothetical cooperation or noncooperation   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] ACF grade voting   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs   Andrew Myers
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Kristofer: Proxy DD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMT repaired. MTAOC simplified. Alternative definition of voting x over y.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMT written right   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Sorry--One more revision of MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Forest's FBC/ABC method   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] David, re: IRV. Chris, re: IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to vote in IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops! Chris is right. Yet another try at a definition.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Complete MMT definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] That was MMT1. MMT2 is like MTAOC. Replacing the word "any" in the definitions.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to vote in IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave Ketchum: IRV strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMT2 meets FBC, fails Mono-Add-Plump, as it should.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Criterion compliances of MMT2   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops! Forgot to include Chris's text. Chris MMT reply, complete this time.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to a posting from Chris on November 17th, re: MDDTR   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Acquiescing majority MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MAM evaluation. Summary of FBC/ABE methods.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] (no subject)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] What are the entries for LRV in my FBC/ABE methods properties table?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMP's strategy incentives   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMP's strategy incentives   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMT's strategy incentives   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Two failed postings, and then one complete one   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: Re: The Occupy-Movement   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Forest: MAMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Forest: I found an FBC failure for Minimal Aquiescing Majorities-Top   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Forest: The example. Jameson: SODA   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: The alternative to mutual majority   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I didn't mean to post that message 3 times. I was notified that I'd have to re-send.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Greatest-Mutual -Approval-Top (GMAT)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops! Errors in GMAT definition. Correct definition.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] You gave the right description of FairVote   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMT: You're evading my questions. I didn't ask for repetition about generalities.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: What LNHe is. Your example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Who wronged the A-plumpers   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Answer to question about GMAT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: IRV consensus? :-)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better-Than-Expectation is the general strategy in Approval and Score-Voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Addendum: Above-Mean strategy is Better-Than-Expectation strategy too.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Three variations of GMAT and MMT   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval strategies   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification about Threat/Promise strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A better between-frontrunners approval cutoff. Typo.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Three suggestions for rank methods and options   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mutual MTA (MMTA). MABucklin2.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Methods based on faction-size or hypothetical cooperation or noncooperation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson: ABE approaches   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Use of middle-rating-witholding standards with ABucklin. Optional voting methods are less criticizable.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Optionalness by candidate. How MTA, MCA & ABucklin can be options in Approval elections.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ways for MTA & MCA as Approval options. AERLO in MTA or MCA.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   Brian Olson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] IRV3/AV3   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Simple SODA strategy (post-election delegated phase)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA strategy   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine (MIKE OSSIPOFF)   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Mutual MTA (MMTA). MABucklin2.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Methods based on faction-size or hypothetical cooperation or noncooperation   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Good references on voting theory   Rémi
• [EM] Thank you!   Rémi
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics   Leon Smith
• [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics   Leon Smith
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage   Warren Smith
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Warren Smith
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time   Warren Smith
• [EM] NP hardness cites for Kemeny   Warren Smith
• [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   Ted Stern
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   Ted Stern
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   Ted Stern
• [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp   Ted Stern
• [EM] Analysis Finds Incorrect Use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San Francisco   Ralph Suter
• [EM] Analysis Finds Incorrect Use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San, Francisco   Ralph Suter
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re to Kristof M   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] irv3/av3   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   David L Wetzell
• [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system   David L Wetzell
• [EM] more anti-IRV propaganda...   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Egg or Chicken.   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Electoral Experimentation   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Electoral Experimentation   David L Wetzell
• [EM] how primary forecasts work   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 90, Issue 42   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   David L Wetzell
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg   David L Wetzell
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Chris: Forest's FBC/ABC method (MIKE OSSIPOFF)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Forest's FBC/ABC method   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMT   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Acquiescing majority MMT (MIKE OSSIPOFF)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Least Resentment Voting (LRV) in the context of Approval   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MAM evaluation. Summary of FBC/ABE methods.   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Mike Ossipoff: LRV properties   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Mike: variations on Kevin's ABE and LRV   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Forest: MAMT   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] SODA strategy   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] FBC failure for acquiescing coalition methods   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Forest example   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine (MIKE OSSIPOFF)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine (MIKE OSSIPOFF)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Better Than Expectation Approval Voting   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Better Than Expectation Approval Voting (2nd try readable format)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Approval Strategy   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Approval Strategy   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Proportional Range Voting via Honest Approval PAV   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs (Jameson Quinn)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Approval Strategy   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Fwd: SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Proportional Range Voting via Honest Approval PAV   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] ACF grade voting   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] MMPO objections   fsimmons at pcc.edu

Last message date: Sat Dec 31 14:29:43 PST 2011
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:35:31 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...