[EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
andru at cs.cornell.edu
Thu Dec 15 06:24:53 PST 2011
On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Andy Jennings wrote:
> I don't see any huge theoretical downsides. Do others still have
> reservations about SODA? I realize that some people may be opposed to
> delegation, in principle. And others think delegable systems just
> don't have a chance of getting implemented. So I think these debates
> about which is the best voting system in the standard (non-delegable)
> model are still useful. I also think it's useful for Jameson to
> inject a plug about SODA every now and then.
I will repeat what I've written before:
> I have to agree. SODA to me seems quite complex. It appears to pose
difficult strategic decisions for candidates and even for voters.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Election-Methods