November 2005 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Nov 1 07:27:56 PST 2005
Ending: Wed Nov 30 23:05:52 PST 2005
Messages: 270

• [EM] Fwd: Peaceful democracy logic needed, also links for new ElectionMethods page   IRV Alliance
• [EM] Fwd: The point is that IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy   IRV Alliance
• [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground   IRV Alliance
• [EM] Election Methods Web software: which ones do you know?   Anguo
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD aren't manipulable. "Manipulable" is barking up the wrong tree.   Chris Benham
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD aren't manipulable. "Manipulable" is barking up the   Chris Benham
• [EM] Anonymity & Neutrality. Results criteria & rules criteria.   Chris Benham
• [EM] STV-PR is not reweighted IRV and not House-Monotonic (was " corrections to older posts re IRV public election data")   Chris Benham
• [EM] STV-PR is not reweighted IRV and not House-Monotonic (was " corrections to older posts re IRV public election data")   Chris Benham
• [EM] STV-PR is not reweighted IRV and not House-Monotonic (was " corrections to older posts re IRV public election data")   Chris Benham
• [EM] simple question (I think)   Chris Benham
• [EM] simple question (I think)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground   Chris Benham
• [EM] Two round system (improved Approval version)   Chris Benham
• [EM] oped in Mercury News on Citizens' Assemblies (forwarded from Steven Hill)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Bucklin PR ?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet Matrix Decomposition   Dan Bishop
• [EM] Condorcet Matrix Decomposition   Dan Bishop
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Dan Bishop
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] what is this method called?   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] what is this method called?   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Brown
• [EM] Condorcet Matrix Decomposition   Rob Brown
• [EM] A new little article   Rob Brown
• [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 17, Issue 46   Rob Brown
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Rob Brown
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Rob Brown
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Rob Brown
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Rob Brown
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Rob Brown
• [EM] UC davis STV election data - not very useful, actually   James Gilmour
• [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why study only public election proposals?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Fwd: The point is that IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy   James Gilmour
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   James Gilmour
• [EM] sample data?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] alternative Smith?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD aren't manipulable. "Manipulable" is barking up the   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD aren't manipulable. "Manipulable" is barking up the   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Why study only public election proposals?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Why study only public election proposals?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] another lottery method   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Fw: Instant Run-Off   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] FW: Approval vs RV and rank methods   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Dave: Approval vs rank methods   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Approval vs rank methods   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why study only public election proposals?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV splits majorities to empower everyone?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Bishop's DMD decomposition   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Bishop's Condorcet Matrix Deconstruction   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Real-world effects   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Some answers to "1-person-1-vote"   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] another lottery method   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] simple question (I think)   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] simple question (I think)   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secretproxy ballot   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] FBC definition (mine)   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Bishop's Condorcet Matrix Deconstruction   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Fwd: [InstantRunoffCO] Dec IRV event in Aspen?   Jan Kok
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Jan Kok
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Gervase Lam
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Gervase Lam
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Gervase Lam
• [EM] what is this method called?   Gervase Lam
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Gervase Lam
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Gervase Lam
• [EM] electowidget   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] electowidget/robla   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Single winner poll conducted using Electowidget   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] debian leader elections 2001-2005   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Why study only public election proposals?   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] simple question (I think)   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Javascript matrix/bar chart generator   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] what is this method called?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Debian leader elections analysis   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Some answers to "1-person-1-vote"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Some answers to "1-person-1-vote"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Fwd: Peaceful democracy logic needed, also links for new ElectionMethods page   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secretproxy ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Andrew Myers
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Andrew Myers
• [EM] FW: Approval vs RV and rank methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: Approval vs rank methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Some answers to "1-person-1-vote"   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD aren't manipulable. "Manipulable" is barking up the wrong tree.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs rank methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Anonymity & Neutrality. Results criteria & rules criteria.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Anonymity & Neutrality. Results criteria & rules criteria.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Retiring from voting systems. Poll suggestions.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] One more obvious thing about Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] In MDDA, Kerry-refusers should co-operate by ranking Kerry   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election Methods Web software: which ones do you know?   Brian Olson
• [EM] Some answers to "1-person-1-vote"   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Some great online data and analysis for STV elections   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Question to Warren regarding the Debian page   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Some answers to "1-person-1-vote"   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] UC davis STV election data - not very useful, actually   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] UC davis STV election data - not very useful, actually   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Fwd: Peaceful democracy logic needed, also links for new ElectionMethods page   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Fwd: The point is that IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] simple question (I think)   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] FBLE probabilities - amazing but true   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] RLPO2PA   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Immunity from Second Place Complaints implies Smith   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Immunization against Second Place Complaints   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] another lottery method   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] another lottery method   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Why study only public election proposals?   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Delete this if you are offended by non-deterministic methods   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Delete this if you are offended by non-deterministic methods   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] single elimination tournaments   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Bishop's Condorcet Matrix Deconstruction   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Allen Smith
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Allen Smith
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Allen Smith
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Allen Smith
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Allen Smith
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Allen Smith
• [EM] electowidget   Warren Smith
• [EM] Debian 2003 election   Warren Smith
• [EM] Debian leader elections analysis   Warren Smith
• [EM] electowidget/robla   Warren Smith
• [EM] debian invalid ballots 2003 / correction/clarification   Warren Smith
• [EM] electowidget   Warren Smith
• [EM] debian leader elections 2001-2005   Warren Smith
• [EM] debian data 2001-2005   Warren Smith
• [EM] debian leader elections 2001-2005   Warren Smith
• [EM] debian leader elections 2001-2005   Warren Smith
• [EM] radio interview about range voting   Warren Smith
• [EM] Ossipoff: "strategizers can take advantage of sincere voters" with Range Voting?   Warren Smith
• [EM] television   Warren Smith
• [EM] Question to Warren regarding the Debian page   Warren Smith
• [EM] UC davis STV election data - not very useful, actually   Warren Smith
• [EM] UC davis STV election data - not very useful, actually   Warren Smith
• [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data   Warren Smith
• [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data   Warren Smith
• [EM] IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy?   Warren Smith
• [EM] Survey of voting methods obeying Mike Ossipoff's "Favorite Betrayal Criterion"   Warren Smith
• [EM] Range Voting & strategy theorems   Warren Smith
• [EM] MDD incmpatible with cloneproofness?   Warren Smith
• [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method   Warren Smith
• [EM] clones and FBC   Warren Smith
• [EM] clones and FBC - a very interesting conjecture   Warren Smith
• [EM] FBC definition (mine)   Warren Smith
• [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 17, Issue 46   Warren Smith
• [EM] Bishop's DMD decomposition   Warren Smith
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Warren Smith
• [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails   Warren Smith
• [EM] FBLE probabilities - amazing but true   Warren Smith
• [EM] Condorcet cycle and FBLE probabilities... serious & instructive error; slick example   Warren Smith
• [EM] democracy conference in Madrid December 1-3   Stephen Turner
• [EM] alternative Smith?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Single winner poll conducted using Electowidget   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] alternative Smith?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Immunization against Second Place Complaints   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] radio interview about range voting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Example of participation/no-show paradox with Condorcet?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Survey of voting methods obeying Mike Ossipoff's "Favorite Betrayal Criterion"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MDD incmpatible with cloneproofness?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] what is this method called?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] A new little article   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] electowidget   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] electowidget   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] simple question (I think)   rob brown
• [EM] simple question (I think)   rob brown
• [EM] simple question (I think)   rob brown
• [EM] simple question (I think)   rob brown
• [EM] simple question (I think)   rob brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   rob brown
• [EM] what is this method called?   rob brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   rob brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   rob brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   rob brown
• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   rob brown
• [EM] A new little article   rob brown
• [EM] Real-world effects   rob brown
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   rob brown
• [EM] sample data?   rob brown
• [EM] Javascript matrix/bar chart generator   rob brown
• [EM] Javascript matrix/bar chart generator   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown

Last message date: Wed Nov 30 23:05:52 PST 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:28 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...