January 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Jan 1 15:39:26 PST 2007
Ending: Wed Jan 31 22:53:26 PST 2007
Messages: 249

• [EM] Simmons cloneproof method is not cloneproof   Chris Benham
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] Simmons cloneproof method is not cloneproof   Chris Benham
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] Benham "zero info strategy = honesty" criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Chris Benham
• [EM] New 3-slot FBC method   Chris Benham
• [EM] New 3-slot FBC method (not)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Strongest pair with single transfer (method)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Chris Benham
• [EM] EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Chris Benham
• [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Chris Benham
• [EM] replies to recent EM posts re voting-design puzzle   Chris Benham
• [EM] Historical apportionment biases   Dan Bishop
• [EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition   Dan Bishop
• [EM] Hay Voting   Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Voronoi diagrams & convolutions   David Cary
• [EM] Credentials?   Brandon J. Van Every
• [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders   James Gilmour
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Nathan Herring
• [EM] Election methods in student government...   Juho
• [EM] Strategic polls in Approval   Juho
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Juho
• [EM] Juho's idea   Juho
• [EM] Strategic polls in Approval   Juho
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Juho
• [EM] Juho's idea   Juho
• [EM] RE : RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland correction   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] New 3-slot FBC method   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] What have I started?!   Jan Kok
• [EM] What have I started?!   Jan Kok
• [EM] Deduction engine idea for proving property-set incompatibilities for EMs   Jan Kok
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] "ThreeBallot" tested by MIT students   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Strategic polls in Approval   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why Mike Ossipoff's "unbised apportionment method" cannot be taken seriously   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What have I started?!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What have I started?!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What have I started?!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What have I started?!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] [RangeVoting] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] clone-immunity - definition please?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ICC & AFB incompatible (with = allowed in votes, under weakened AFB definition version)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Voter Cancellation Methods   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Apportionment   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Complexity and Fairness Questions   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Clarifying Bias-Free definition   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Joe: Could you explain the question?   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Joe: "Many kinds of bias"?   Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Clariflying Adjusted Rounding definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] s/q distance minimizations are incompatible with unbias. Some bias discussion.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo--undefined term   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Apportionment method w/ unconditional unbias & pair-monotonicity   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Cycle-Webster definition written more completely   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I propose Bias-Free, Cycle-Webster, and Adjusted-Rounding   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Meet Warren Smith   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Meet Warren Smith   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 3, Meet Warren Smith   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Bias-Free reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bias-Free   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How unfair is distribution-caused bias?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bias-Free, contd.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bias-Free, contd.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Where BF assumes uniform distribution   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Credentials?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Aha, now I understand Ossipoff...   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Aha, now l understand Ossipoff...   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Correction: AR doesn't need improvement. AR is the best method.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   Brian Olson
• [EM] 10 choice sim plots   Brian Olson
• [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland   Brian Olson
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   Brian Olson
• [EM] Detailed (but obvious) instructions for Adjusted-Rounding   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Bias-Free   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kindness and generosity will not go un-thanked.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] More Ossipoffness...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2, More Ossipoffness...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Luxury strategy option for Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Small ARLO addendum   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarificaton   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2, More apportionment...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 3, More apportionment   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 4, More apportionment...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 1, More apportionment...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ossipoff-Smith had better not be Adjusted-Rounding.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clearing up an ambiguity in the detailed instruction   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clearinlg up an ambiguity in CW's in-cycle apportionment   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A good way to fit B/(q+A) to state density function   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren: Your method   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Joe--thanks fsor comments   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What have I started?!   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reposing a message that didn't post before   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarifying Bias-Free definition   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Bias-Free in the historical census apportionments   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarifying Bias-Free definition   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What have I started?!   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren--BF's apportionment score   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren Bias-Free reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2, Warren Bias-Free reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 1, Warren Bias-Free reply   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 3, Warren Bias-Free   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Unbias by definition. Quantitative bias comparisons by testing.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Joe: Could you explain the question?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Bias measures--There really are no two ways about it   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Joe: "Many kinds of bias"?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reply to Joe   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] BF and the no-minimum census apportionments   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Bias definition and bias-test   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Fine version of bias-test (small, brief modification)   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A little simplification of bias-test   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Non-preference ICC definition--does it go someting like this?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] typo   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] ICC dfn I posted applies to Approval. Approval fails it.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] ICC dfn I posted applies to Approval. Approval fails it.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren: Post rules for your methods?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Another way of wrilting Weighted Bias-Free's formula   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Oops! :-) Bias-Free's fallacy   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Webster   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Finding the constants for the approximating function   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What I mean by Weighed Webster   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ossipoff's Weighted Webster...   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw   Markus Schulze
• [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] clone-immunity - definition please?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] clone immunity definitional problems   Markus Schulze
• [EM] A class of determinsitic methods based on non-deterministic methods   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] clone proofing Copeland   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] defining the "median voter" when the issue space is not one dimensional   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Voter Cancellation Methods   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Juho's idea   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] voter cancellation method   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Some more ideas along the lines of my recent postings   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] voter cancellation, etc.   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] A Markov Steady State Distribution Lottery and Related Deterministic Method   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Markov, etc. (correction)   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] GSA   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] MCA   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] voting system design puzzle   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] FBC and ICC, when equal ranks are allowed   Forest W Simmons
• [EM] IEVS 1.0 voting system comparator code now available - contribute code?   Warren Smith
• [EM] Benham "zero info strategy = honesty" criterion   Warren Smith
• [EM] The best voting methods with honest voters   Warren Smith
• [EM] http://rangevoting.org/IEVS/IEVS.c   Warren Smith
• [EM] IEVS (exptl version) now producing Yee-type nifty pictures   Warren Smith
• [EM] apportionment essay, pictures   Warren Smith
• [EM] Better apportionment method, web page/paper on   Warren Smith
• [EM] Huntington's apportionment paper of 1928   Warren Smith
• [EM] Why Mike Ossipoff's "unbised apportionment method" cannot be taken seriously   Warren Smith
• [EM] Aha, think I understand Ossipoff now (& apologize for misunderstanding...)   Warren Smith
• [EM] apportionment and some random Ossipoffness   Warren Smith
• [EM] more of the unbiased apportionment method potpourri   Warren Smith
• [EM] more on apportionment - which member of potpourri "morally best"? - about AR   Warren Smith
• [EM] voting system design puzzle   Warren Smith
• [EM] apportionment, some replies to Ossip. and Malk.   Warren Smith
• [EM] "cycle webster" is not a divisor method hence not monotonic   Warren Smith
• [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Warren Smith
• [EM] apportionment, some new methods as food for thought; ossipoff&bias   Warren Smith
• [EM] EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Warren Smith
• [EM] replies to recent EM posts re apportionment & voting-design puzzle   Warren Smith
• [EM] typo   Warren Smith
• [EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition   Warren Smith
• [EM] ossipoff tries to define "bias" for apportionment   Warren Smith
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially)   Warren Smith
• [EM] clone-immunity - definition please?   Warren Smith
• [EM] clone immunity definitional problems   Warren Smith
• [EM] clone confusion   Warren Smith
• [EM] cloning - how Woodall dealt with the issue   Warren Smith
• [EM] concise apportionment formulas   Warren Smith
• [EM] Deduction engine idea for proving property-set incompatibilities for EMs   Warren Smith
• [EM] ICC & AFB incompatible (with = allowed in votes, under weakened AFB definition version)   Warren Smith
• [EM] Ossipoff's "weighted webster" appears to be the same as my method...   Warren Smith
• [EM] Deduction engine - maybe not worth it   Warren Smith
• [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland correction   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] pseudocode for Woodall's DSC method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Benham "zero info strategy = honesty" criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: voter cancellation method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: voter cancellation, etc.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: New 3-slot FBC method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Credentials?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Strongest pair with single transfer (method)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Hay Voting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Strongest pair with single transfer (method)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Hay Voting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] majoritarian top ratings (MTR) (sent to EM list Dec.12)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet and other methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Non-preference ICC definition--does it go someting like this?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : clone immunity definitional problems   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: FBC and ICC, when equal ranks are allowed   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why Mike Ossipoff's "unbised apportionment method" cannot be taken seriously   Ka-Ping Yee
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?)   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Clone proofing Copeland   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] The best voting methods with honest voters   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet and other methods   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [EM] approval and PR-STV   raphfrk at netscape.net

Last message date: Wed Jan 31 22:53:26 PST 2007
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:53 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...