[EM] Part 3, Meet Warren Smith

[MIKE OSSIPOFF]

Warren said:

, but it is obvious
to me that you messed up
for several reasons).

I reply:

...which you are unable to articulate. Apparently some sort of petty spite
is among your reasons.


well, alright.  Your formula has

1.plainly wrong asymptotic behavior and

I reply:

BF's rounding points approach those of Webster, in the limit of larger pairs 
of consecutive integers.

Between 0 and 1 it's an improper integral, but when it's evaluated, the 
rounding point is at 1/e.

Warren continues:


2.plainly wrong specific values (after some computing)

I reply:

...which Warren has never specified.


Warren continues

, and
3.this sort of formula simply never arises in the ways you said,
so it must be wrong.

I reply:

The meaning of that isn't at all clear.

Warren said:

I have no responsibility to find errors in your derivation


I reply:

Regrettably your reticence doesn't extend to not making many angrily-worded 
unsuported claims.

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Fixing up the home? Live Search can help 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG

_________________________________________________________________
The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here.  Get all the scoop. 
http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2