[EM] Ossipoff-Smith had better not be Adjusted-Rounding.

[Michael Ossipoff]

In a recent posting, you implied that Adjusted-Rounding is not independent 
of the distribution, and that you have a modification that is. That suggests 
that you're saying that Adjusted-Rounding is something other than the AR 
that I've defined, and that maybe your "modification" is, in fact, 
Adjusted-Rounding.

You haven't posted a concise definition of your methods, and apparently you 
aren't going to. I'm not inclinded to wade into the unnecessary work of 
reading not-so-consise definitions. But, in the case of your methods, I'm 
going to make an exception--in a few days or a few weeks. And, when I do, I 
don't want any of those method to be Adjusted-Rounding, or any of my other 
methods. Comprende?

Mike Ossipoff