[EM] Apportionment method w/ unconditional unbias & pair-monotonicity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp at hotmail.com
Mon Jan 15 22:16:47 PST 2007
Adjusted-Rounding:
No different from the other rounding methods, such as Webster, Jefferson,
Hill & Bias-Free, AR differs only in that, instead of having a formula for
its rounding point, it chooses for each cycle, during the trial of any
particular quota, a rounding point that will put that cycle's s/q as close
as possible to 1. In other words, to put the cycle's states' summed seats as
close as possible to the cycle's states' summed quotas.
Obviously a particular cycle won't necessarily contain the same states when
different quotas are tried. Disadvantages: More work. The systematic
procedure used by Webster, Bias-Free, etc. isn't possible in AR. Trial and
error is needed to find the cycle that gives 435 seats.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
Get FREE Web site and company branded e-mail from Microsoft Office Live
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list