[EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition

[Michael Ossipoff]

It still isn't possible to send long postings, because of modem shutting 
off.

Here's what bias means to most people:

A method is large-biased if the largest states have more s/q than the 
smallest states.

Imprecise, but it can be improved if we specify that we're talking about a 
hypothetical country with arbitrarily many states. "Large states" means an 
arbitrarily large number of states at the top end. Small states likewise 
defined.

With so many states in "large states", local-positioning-caused s/q 
disparity, caused by different states being in dilfferent parts of their 
cycles, averages out and cancels out. We're left with the disparity in the 
cycles' average s/q.

My methods transparently make cycles' average s/q equal, as nearly as 
possible.

Mike Ossipoff