[EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland

Brian Olson bql at bolson.org
Wed Jan 3 11:24:18 PST 2007

It then becomes Instant Runoff by Schwartz Set. Nothing wrong with  
that except as with all instant runoff methods it is no longer  
summable and requires multiple passes through the whole set of votes.  
In this case two passes. First pass, find the Schwartz set, second  
pass find the highest ranked votes among that set.

On Jan 3, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Chris Benham wrote:

> But what is wrong with my suggestion of first dropping from the  
> ballots the non-members of  the
> Schwartz set?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20070103/8b39045a/attachment-0003.htm>

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list