January 2005 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Jan 1 06:03:11 PST 2005
Ending: Mon Jan 31 22:00:12 PST 2005
Messages: 281

• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Is Range Voting the panacea we need? (repeat, with missing link)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Chris, Range-Voting   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: James: Your Range-Voting comments   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Chris--Your Range-Voting comments   Chris Benham
• [EM] Logic/Jargon question   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Another method idea   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Explicit Voter Median Elections   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Condorcet failure of Approval Voting (was Re: Dave reply)   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Did Mr May bungle 2 candidate SNTV election maths to hide the fact of 5 papers?   Craig Carey
• [EM] Did Mr May bungle 2 candidate SNTV election maths to hide the fact of 5 papers?   Craig Carey
• [EM] Did Mr May bungle 2 candidate SNTV election maths to hide the fact of 5 papers?   Craig Carey
• [EM] May's Theorem did not use words "Strictly prefer"   Craig Carey
• [EM] The challenge: reasoning from Berlin solving 2 candidate elections   Craig Carey
• [EM] EML's failure to understand 2 candidate maths   Craig Carey
• [EM] electionmethods website is cancelled   Craig Carey
• Wrong information at Green-Armytage webpage (Re: [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   Craig Carey
• Source of claim that imagination is wanted (was Re: [EM] James: Approval & voter median   Craig Carey
• [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters?   Craig Carey
• [EM] Mutt-brain SCHULZE; MinMax (Pairwise Opposition) A-wins equation   Craig Carey
• MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list (Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic   Craig Carey
• [EM] STV Quotas   Greg Dennis
• [EM] justified criticism, higher/lower   Anthony Duff
• [EM] approval strategy   Anthony Duff
• [EM] electionmethods.org idea?   Bjarke Dahl Ebert
• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   FL
• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   FL
• [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic   FL
• [EM] justified criticism, higher/lower   James Gilmour
• [EM] Iraq election system   James Gilmour
• [EM] Did Mr May bungle 2 candidate SNTV election maths to hide the fact of 5 papers?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Corrected commentary re IRV   Eric Gorr
• [EM] electionmethods.org idea?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Ongoing disputes   Eric Gorr
• [EM] my 2¢ on range voting (and other pseudomajority methods)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] AV strategy is hard and that's good   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] majority rule criteria   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] majority rule criteria and you   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] majority rule criteria   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James: Your majority-rule classifying & naming   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Order of succession in voting methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] justified criticism, higher/lower   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James: counting time   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] approval strategy   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] approval scenarios, part 1   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] How Approval locks on to the CW in two or three moves.   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] can't we all just get along?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Iraq election system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: twisted prism, etc.   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Another Grand Compromise   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] non-determinism and PR.   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Any up for a reply to an IRV advocate in Washington State?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Bart Ingles
• [EM] approval scenarios, part 1   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Iraq election system   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Condorcet failure of Approval Voting (was Re: Dave reply)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Election Certification   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Deterministic Districting   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] electionmethods.org idea?   Dan Keshet
• [EM] Announcement: new election-methods Wiki!   Dan Keshet
• [EM] software   Dan Keshet
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled]   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] approval strategy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteriesof candidates :-)   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Logic/Jargon question   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Very brief Russ reply   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Counting Time   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Counting Time   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] More comments Re: Can't we all get along?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates)   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Europe's autonomy solutions [for ethnic groups]   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Secondary list moderator   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Random thought on Range Voting   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Random thought on Range Voting   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Condorcet/Range voting?   Mike
• [EM] Thanks to a couple of list members (Condorcet/Range completion method)   Mike
• [EM] Deterministic Districting   Mike
• [EM] Re: redistricting   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Practicality of ranked ballot methods   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Chris, Range-Voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Range-Voting article--basically right, but a few disagreements   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comparison summary   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] When sincere Approval is optimal   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: Your Range-Voting comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Chris, about Range Voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Chris--Your Range-Voting comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: To Chris, about Range-Voting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to first part of Chris's CR comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: Your majority-rule classifying & naming   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] electionmethods website is cancelled   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: James--Your classification & naming   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: counting time   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ's overlong, off-topic poting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Information needed to apply WDSC & SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Smith set   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Very brief Russ reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The ambiguously reworded definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Smith set   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Approval Strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Improving Approval Strategy posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James: Approval & voter median   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Approval scenarios, part 1   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The other strategies give the Acceptable/Unacceptable strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Expected Utility Differences strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] This is not a continuation of an arguemnt or debate   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Suggestions for choice of Best Frontrunner versions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Rewordng strategy A (BF(1st))   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Strategy A   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better/Worse is simplified Better than Expectation   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better/Worse strategy with 0-info   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Flipping a coin   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Can't we all just get along?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More comments Re: Can't we all get along?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ's hopefully final reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Craig: I did include ballot-counting code   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Standards for credibility on EM (an on-topic post that doesn't name anyone)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Range Voting   Brian Olson
• [EM] Range-Voting article--basically right, but a few disagreements   Brian Olson
• [EM] Random thought on Range Voting   Brian Olson
• Re: [EM] my 2¢ on range voting (and other pseudomajority methods)   Brian Olson
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Brian Olson
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Russ's overlong, off-topic poting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Very brief Russ reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] approval strategy   Russ Paielli
• [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] approval strategy   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Very brief Russ reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] How Approval locks onto the CW in two or three moves   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: can't we all just get along?   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Approval Strategy in the Three Competitive Party case.   Russ Paielli
• [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Final reply to MIke (don't miss it!)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election   Russ Paielli
• [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Deterministic Districting   Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Deterministic Districting   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Re: redistricting - objectively   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Re: redistricting - objectively   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Question/Strategic Approval Voting   Michael A. Rouse
• [EM] Interesting article on proxy voting   Michael A. Rouse
• [EM] Order of succession in voting methods   Michael A. Rouse
• [EM] Plurality-order principle   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Chris, Range-Voting   Markus Schulze
• [EM] May's Theorem   Markus Schulze
• [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Mutt-brain SCHULZE; MinMax (Pairwise Opposition) A-wins equation   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] R Suter's commentary on IRV   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: lotteries   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: lotteries   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: twisted prism, etc.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Range Voting   Forest Simmons
• [EM] redistricting   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: approval strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Why Three Candidate Methods Are So Important   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Re: electionsmethods website is cancelled   Forest Simmons
• [EM] approval strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] approval scenarios, part 1   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another method idea   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another method idea   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How Approval locks on to the CW in two or three moves.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How Approval locks on to the CW in two or three moves.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another Grand Compromise   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Counting Time   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Counting Time   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How Approval locks onto the CW in two or three moves   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] More Lottery Methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st))   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval Strategy in the Three Competitive Party case.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Random thought on Range Voting   Alex Small
• [EM] Caveats for people working on alternative election methods   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)   Alex Small
• [EM] Peace and Harmony on the List   Alex Small
• [EM] Ongoing disputes   Alex Small
• [EM] why is covered vs. uncovered important?   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: lotteries   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteriesof candidates :-)   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Deterministic Districting   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Deterministic Districting   Ted Stern
• [EM] Any up for a reply to an IRV advocate in Washington State?   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids   Ted Stern
• [EM] What's the minimal covering set?   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Range Voting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Three-candidate failure problems   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Thanks to a couple of list members (Condorcet/Range completion method)   Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] my 2¢ on range voting (and other pseudomajority methods)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Chris--Your Range-Voting comments   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] majority rule criteria   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Plurality-order principle   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Logic/Jargon question   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] approval strategy   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] approval defection; another easy method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Majority Opposition" criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] approval strategy   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Iraq election system   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MinMax (Pairwise Opposition) A-wins equation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Corrected commentary re IRV   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Voter instructions for Approval & Range Voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] AV strategy is hard and that's good   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Deterministic Districting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] majority rule criteria   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Range Voting   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] Deterministic Districting   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] redistricting   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] Amendment and Succesive   Cruz VIcente Omar de la

Last message date: Mon Jan 31 22:00:12 PST 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:46 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...