April 2001 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Apr 1 12:27:06 PDT 2001
Ending: Mon Apr 30 23:40:56 PDT 2001
Messages: 366

• [EM] Approval Promoters; "Stop Fooling Yourselves"   Buddha Buck
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Buddha Buck
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Rob Ritchie of CVD: the fiery divine reforming influencers of US political life   Craig Carey
• [EM] Approval Vote ballot paper sought; rejected by 'one man one vote' rules   Craig Carey
• [EM] Actual Approval Elections:   Craig Carey
• I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re: [EM] Approval Elections & Effective Weights   Craig Carey
• I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re: [EM]Approval Elections & Effective Weights   Craig Carey
• [EM] Martin Harper did not provide a definition of the function he knew was P   Craig Carey
• [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a?   David Catchpole
• [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a?   David Catchpole
• [EM] Martin's Sixty-Forty Split Districts:   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] IRV mailing party adventures   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy   LAYTON Craig
• IRV mailing party adventures   LAYTON Craig
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Approval, polling and strategy   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Reply to Craig   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Absolute Utilities   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Voting on matters of pure fact   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Sum-up for Ranked Pairs   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Blake Cretney
• [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Duncan Black on Condorcet   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Blake takes the low road...   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Social Utility   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Evidently math-training isn't enough.   Blake Cretney
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Blake Cretney
• Blake takes the low road   Blake Cretney
• [EM] RP ranking criteria   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Voting on matters of pure fact   Blake Cretney
• [EM] SSD, RP wrap-up   Blake Cretney
• [EM] SSD, RP wrap-up   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Sum-up for Ranked Pairs   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Examples: Margins, strategy pushover   Blake Cretney
• [EM] To Blake, re: pushover examples   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Approval Runoff   Moe St. EverGreen
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Martin Harper
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Martin Harper
• [EM] Get Real, Richard Moore:   Martin Harper
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!]   Martin Harper
• [EM] Martin's Sixty-Forty Split Districts:   Martin Harper
• [EM] Another Approval-Condorcet compromise method   Martin Harper
• [EM] Approval for Tom   Martin Harper
• [EM] Universal Approval   Martin Harper
• IRV mailing party adventures   Martin Harper
• [EM] Approval Promoters; "Stop Fooling Yourselves"   Martin Harper
• [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy   Martin Harper
• [EM] The Golden Rule of Preferences:   Martin Harper
• IRV mailing party adventures   Martin Harper
• [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   Martin Harper
• [EM] Approval Vote ballot paper sought; rejected by 'one man onevote' rules   Martin Harper
• [EM] Actual Approval Elections:   Martin Harper
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Martin Harper
• [EM] Approval Elections & Effective Weights   Martin Harper
• [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC   Martin Harper
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Martin Harper
• [EM] STV By Meek's Method   Martin Harper
• I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re: [EM]Approval Elections & Effective Weights   Martin Harper
• I told Rob Richie, use "IRV", its catchy (was Re:[EM]Approval Elections & Effective Weights   Martin Harper
• [EM] Keeping elections simple   Martin Harper
• [EM] Campaign issue: wv vs m   Martin Harper
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Martin Harper
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Martin Harper
• [EM] Dyadic Votes   Martin Harper
• [EM] Nomination   Martin Harper
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Martin Harper
• [EM] Absolute Utilities   Martin Harper
• [EM] WDSC (and the rest)   Martin Harper
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Martin Harper
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Martin Harper
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Martin Harper
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Martin Harper
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Martin Harper
• [EM] number of ways to vote a ranked ballot.   Martin Harper
• [EM] PR/IRV bill in Congress   Bart Ingles
• IRV mailing party adventures   Bart Ingles
• [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Any Libertarians here?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] The None of the Above Chorus:   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Bart Ingles
• The None of the Above Chorus:   Bart Ingles
• The None of the Above Chorus:   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Behind the Ballot Box   Bart Ingles
• Medians (was Re: [EM] Absolute Utilities)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Get Real, Richard Moore:   I Like Irving
• [EM] FWD - Thank You Mister Mike Ossipoff   I Like Irving
• [EM] Martin's Sixty-Forty Split Districts:   I Like Irving
• [EM] Approval Promoters; "Stop Fooling Yourselves"   I Like Irving
• [EM] The Golden Rule of Preferences:   I Like Irving
• [EM] Actual Approval Elections:   I Like Irving
• [EM] FWD - Center for Voting and Democracy Digest:   I Like Irving
• [EM] The None of the Above Chorus:   I Like Irving
• [EM] Approval Vote ballot paper sought; rejected by 'one man one vote' rules   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Which Condorcet completion method is best?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] A few poll details   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Sum-up for Ranked Pairs   Rob LeGrand
• Sum-up for Ranked Pairs; wv & margins comments   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Meaning of "all-votes"   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] number of ways to vote a ranked ballot.   Rob LeGrand
• Majority? Expressivity? Strategy?   Richard Moore
• [EM] Get Real, Richard Moore:   Richard Moore
• [EM] What would Tom impose, and how?   Richard Moore
• [EM] IRV mailing party adventures   Richard Moore
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   Richard Moore
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   Richard Moore
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   Richard Moore
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] Voter's Choice final Approval scores.   Richard Moore
• [EM] Approval Elections & Effective Weights   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some nominations so far   Richard Moore
• [EM] Craig's example   Richard Moore
• [EM] nominations   Richard Moore
• [EM] Nomination   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Richard Moore
• [EM] Approval, polling and strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Richard Moore
• [EM] Nomination   Richard Moore
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument (Approval)   Richard Moore
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] margins vs. winning votes   Richard Moore
• [EM] Cranor's method (was unranked IRV, cumulative, etc.)   Richard Moore
• [EM] Sum-up for Ranked Pairs   Richard Moore
• [EM] wv & margins comments   Richard Moore
• Sum-up for Ranked Pairs; wv & margins comments   Richard Moore
• [EM] Richard & the diagram   Richard Moore
• [EM] Examples: Margins, strategy pushover   Richard Moore
• Richard's diagram   Richard Moore
• [EM] number of ways to vote a ranked ballot.   Richard Moore
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Blake's interpretation vs Condorcet's words   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] What would Tom impose, and how?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] What would Tom impose, and how?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Fwd: Re: [EM] Ballot for poll on poll topics   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Voting Systems wins the poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Voter's Choice final Approval scores.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 3 it is, then, for tie in designated method.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's myopia   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Poll Ballots, from poll-topics poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] DSV clarification   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to run opl on Psion 3a?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Craig's rant   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] output ranking   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Some nominations so far   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] nominations   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] no primary   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Campaign issue: wv vs m   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Campaign issue: wv vs m   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Blake takes the low road...   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Getting rid of the primary   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Further comments re: Blake's letter   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Replying to Markus   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Blake takes the low road   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 4/18/01 reply to Markus   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Craig   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Reply to Markus   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Evidently math-training isn't enough.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Nominataing RP(wv)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] WV, Margins wrap-up   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SSD, RP wrap-up   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ballot for Voting Systems poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A few poll details   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops! Omitted Plurality, IRV, & Borda.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Some method definitions.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ridiculous order-reversal precaution   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ridiculous order-reversal precaution   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Take a number & get in line.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Martin's criteria objections   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus wants to justify my remarks.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Fwd: [EM] Antisocial behavior (from Steve Eppley)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Four ballots in voting systems poll   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Plurality example: 1/2, not 5/6   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 5 ballots now.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] wv & margins comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Richard & the diagram   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] viciousness to a voting system?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Examples: Margins, strategy pushover   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Richard's diagram   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo: 41,20,30--not 40,20,30   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Blake, re: pushover examples   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I re-voted, you can too.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The poll is for advocates of other methods too   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Method Combinations   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Unequally ranking equally-preferred candidates   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Richard & the diagram   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Cloneproof SSD definition wordings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Blake reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Combining election methods   Michael Rouse
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Tom Ruen
• Majority? Expressivity? Strategy?   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval   Tom Ruen
• [EM] What would Tom impose, and how?   Tom Ruen
• [EM] IRV mailing party adventures   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Tom Ruen
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Tom Ruen
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Tom Ruen
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Tom Ruen
• [EM] 3 choices/5 voters Example   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Open primary   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Open primary   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Duncan Black on Condorcet   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Which Condorcet completion method is best?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Duncan Black on Condorcet   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Further comments re: Blake's letter   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Replying to Markus   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Blake takes the low road   Markus Schulze
• [EM] WDSC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Nominataing RP(wv)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Which Condorcet completion method is best?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] SSD, RP wrap-up   Markus Schulze
• [EM] SSD, RP wrap-up   Markus Schulze
• [EM] SSD, RP wrap-up   Markus Schulze
• Fwd: [EM] Antisocial behavior (from Steve Eppley)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Common voting patterns   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval   Anthony Simmons
• Majority? Expressivity? Strategy?   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Concepts and Reality   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Another one-man-one-vote proof   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Voter's Choice final Approval scores.   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] output ranking   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   Anthony Simmons
• Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Open primary   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] None-of-the-above   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Honor system   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Sequential Approval & Sequential Plurality   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Voting on matters of pure fact   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Voting on matters of pure fact   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] The None of the Above Chorus:   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Voting on matters of pure fact   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Problem with messages in digest   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Dismal bunch of clown clones   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Expressive and instrumental votes   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Richard & the diagram   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A method that satisfies GSFC, FBC and SDSC.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic Approval definition (fourth installment)   Forest Simmons
• IRV mailing party adventures   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another Approval-Condorcet compromise method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A much too complicated sporting analogy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] What would Tom impose, and how?   Forest Simmons
• IRV mailing party adventures (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another Approval-Condorcet compromise method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV's myopia   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV's myopia   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Five Slot Method   Forest Simmons
• Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   Forest Simmons
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   Forest Simmons
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic Votes   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nomination   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nomination   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nomination   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Forest Simmons
• [EM] The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Unranked-IRV, Cumulative, and Normalized Ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cranor's method (was unranked IRV, cumulative, etc.)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Most YES tiebreaker   Forest Simmons
• [EM] The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Forest Simmons
• The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• The None of the Above Chorus:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Five Slots Approval (was Five Slots and Cranor)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Absolute Utilities   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV Psychology   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nothing much   Tony Simmons
• [EM] Getting rid of primary   Tony Simmons
• [EM] Unsubscribe   Rob Trainor
• [EM] Voting on matters of pure fact   Arnold B. Urken
• [EM] Five Slots and Cranor   Joe Weinstein
• Majority? Expressivity? Strategy?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Unranked IRV versus Approval - divergent winners exist!   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Blake's interpretation vs Condorcet's words   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Condorcet cyclic drop rule   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Majority? Expressivity? Strategy?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• A pairwise elimination satisfying SFC,SDSC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• IRV mailing party adventures   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Condorcet cyclic drop rule   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• IRV mailing party adventures   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Mixed Condorcet-Plurality   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] 3 choices/5 voters Example   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Keeping elections simple   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Some brief campaign argument   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Absolute Voting Scale   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Blake takes the low road...   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] 9 Voters/ 3 Choices   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Supreme Upholds N.C. Congressional District   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Some brief campaign argument   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Social Utility   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Smallest YES tiebreaker   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Most YES tiebreaker   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• RP ranking criteria   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• The None of the Above Chorus:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: The None of the Above Chorus:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: The None of the Above Chorus:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Five Slots and Cranor   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Behind the Ballot Box   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Meaning of "all-votes"   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Examples: Margins, strategy pushover   DEMOREP1 at aol.com

Last message date: Mon Apr 30 23:40:56 PDT 2001
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:24 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...