[EM] Martin Harper did not provide a definition of the function he knew was P
research at ijs.co.nz
Fri Apr 13 13:56:02 PDT 2001
At 2001-04-12 19:09 +0100 Thursday, Martin Harper wrote:
>I was going to write a longer reply, but this seems to be the crux of the
>> The test [for the power of a vote] is clearly stated but it does not
>> methods outside of the topic of preferential voting (i.e. checkbox methods,
>> e.g. the ASVB sub-vote Variant Block Vote voting method. I call it
>Now, previously you stated that Approval wasn't a preferential voting method,
>right? So the test doesn't apply to Approval, right? Great! So why exactly
>discussing whether Approval passes or fails the test? :-/
>What have I missed? Something important clearly...
I decline to answer. I am quitting. This list has subscribers that appear
to be very stupid.
More information about the Election-Methods