September 2004 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Sep 1 02:32:20 PDT 2004
Ending: Thu Sep 30 23:47:01 PDT 2004
Messages: 256

• [EM] Approval and Condorcet votes   Ma Anguo
• [EM] Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Ma Anguo
• [EM] plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   Ma Anguo
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   Steven Barney
• [EM] Re: IRV-P. Another name for Condorcet?   Steven Barney
• [EM] Re: "Weighted Pairwise" proposal (Oops!)   Chris Benham
• [EM] EM] recommendations (single-winner)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: reccomendations (Scwartz // SC-WMA correction)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: reccomendations (Schwartz // SC-WMA correction)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: reccomendations (Schwartz // SC-WMA)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Meek and Newland-Britton   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Ranked choice ballots   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: voting machines   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: voting machines   Rob Brown
• [EM] Hybrid ranking / approval ballot design   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: cyclic ballots   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   Rob Brown
• [EM] slashdot discussion   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: making the electoral college obsolete without a constitutional amendment   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Stabilizing the electoral college (was Re: electoral college)   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: electoral college   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: Stabilizing the electoral college (was Re: electoral college)   Rob Brown
• [EM] Re: IRV-P. Another name for Condorcet?   Rob Brown
• [EM] You all missed JOBST's Big Bang where wrong "A over B" numbers are created   Craig Carey
• Modifying ballot papers (Re: [EM] Utilities?   Craig Carey
• [EM] You all missed JOBST's Big Bang where wrong "A over B" numbers are created   Craig Carey
• [EM] You all missed JOBST's Big Bang where wrong "A over B" numbers are created   Craig Carey
• [EM] recommendations Australia's STV/party list not so bad   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Re: group strategy equilibria: no sincere CW   Anthony Duff
• Utilities? (was Re: [EM] Re: river, ROACC)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Steve Eppley
• Oops, sorry Stephane (was Re: [EM] Re: Utilities?)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   Steve Eppley
• [EM] are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] making the electoral college obsolete without a constitutional amendment   Steve Eppley
• Stabilizing the electoral college (was Re: [EM] electoral college)   Steve Eppley
• Why care about Schwartz? (was Re: [EM] Re: are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Stabilizing the electoral college (was Re: electoral college)   Steve Eppley
• Stabilizing the electoral college (was Re: [EM] electoral college)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Stabilizing the electoral college (was Re: electoral college)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Condorcet incompatibility proofs   Steve Eppley
• [EM] IRRV as best popular name for Condorcet voting   Steve Eppley
• [EM] IRRV as best popular name for Condorcet voting   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Condorcet incompatibility proofs   Steve Eppley
• [EM] seeking 5 candidate Condorcet example   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: voting machines   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Re: plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   James Gilmour
• [EM] Re: proper Borda implementation   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I woke up?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-collection   Eric Gorr
• [EM] electoral college   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Condorcet Mention   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: thoughts on weighted pairwise   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: river, ROACC   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] weighted pairwise (was: recommendations)   James Green-Armytage
• Utilities? (was Re: [EM] Re: river, ROACC)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] second-order pairwise?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] compromise proposal number one: a most (but perhaps too) simple version   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] cyclic ballots   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: reccomendations (Scwartz // SC-WMA correction)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] cyclic ballots   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Meek and Newland-Britton   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Meek and Newland-Britton   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] "Third Parties Presidential Debate"... and debates in general   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] the name of the rose   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] making the electoral college obsolete without a constitutional amendment   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] electoral college   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: electoral college   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] electoral college   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] apologies to Eric   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] compromising strategy in Condorcet...   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Compromising   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet incompatibility proofs   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] compromising strategy in Condorcet...   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] pairwise as best popular name for Condorcet voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet incompatibility proofs   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Condorcet incompatibility proofs   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] anti-Borda   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] compromising strategy in Condorcet...   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Heitzig method   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] pairwise as best popular name for Condorcet voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] winning ratings differentials versus marginal ratings differentials   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proper Borda implementation   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] cardinal-weighted pairwise paper   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Utilities? / terminology   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] thoughts on weighted pairwise   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Utilities?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] compromise proposal number one: a most (but perhaps too) simple version   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] paradigms...   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] compromise proposal number one: a most (but perhaps too) simple version   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] paradigms...   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: IRV-P. Another name for Condorcet?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] compromising strategy in Condorcet...   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] "small case" study   Bart Ingles
• [EM] plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRRV as best popular name for Condorcet voting   Bart Ingles
• [EM] proper Borda implementation   Bart Ingles
• [EM] proper Borda implementation   Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Re: Ranked choice ballots   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: voting machines   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] paradigms...   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] paradigms...   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Thoughts on electoral college   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: IRV-P. Another name for Condorcet?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] affects of IRR(V) and meaning of democracy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] affects of IRR(V) and meaning of democracy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Ranked choice ballots   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-collection   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences andapplication to vote-collection   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferencesandapplication to vote-collection   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 14   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] cyclic ballots   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] cyclic ballots   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] I'll try one last time   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] I'll try one last time   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and applicationto vote-collection   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: proper Borda implementation   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Markets and Information   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: IRV-P. Another name for Condorcet?   Jan Kok
• [EM] recommendations   Kevin Lamoreau
• [EM] IRV-P   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Re: Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] New version of n-rank ballot   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Re: electoral college   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: seeking 5 candidate Condorcet example   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: seeking 5 candidate Condorcet example   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] RP implemented on CIVS   Andrew Myers
• [EM] pSTV v0.5   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] pSTV v0.5.2 beta   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] proper Borda implementation   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Re: proper Borda implementation   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Why bicameralism ?   Brian Olson
• [EM] cyclic ballots   Brian Olson
• [EM] Re: IRV-P. Another name for Condorcet?   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why bicameralism ?   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] California Dreamin', Take 4   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] "Third Parties Presidential Debate"... and debates in general   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] pairwise as best popular name for Condorcet voting   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Re: meaning of democracy   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] affects of IRR(V) and meaning of democracy   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Jargon Dictionary   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] "small case" study   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Why bicameralism ?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] California Dreamin', Take 2   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: "Implied ranked choice" method   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Why I woke up?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: paradigms...   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   Warren Schudy
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-collection   Warren Schudy
• [EM] beatpath tiebreaking (question)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] You all missed JOBST's Big Bang where wrong "A over B" numbers are created   Markus Schulze
• [EM] You all missed JOBST's Big Bang where wrong "A over B" numbers are created   Markus Schulze
• [EM] You all missed JOBST's Big Bang where wrong "A over B" numbers are created   Markus Schulze
• [EM] are ranked pairs and river Schwartz-consistent?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] compromising strategy in Condorcet...   Markus Schulze
• [EM] compromising strategy in Condorcet...   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: proper Borda implementation   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 14   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 16   Alex Small
• [EM] cyclic individual preferences   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 25   Alex Small
• [EM] Thoughts on electoral college   Alex Small
• [EM] Markets and Information   Alex Small
• [EM] Does this implement AERLO without recounts?   Ted Stern
• [EM] seeking 5 candidate Condorcet example   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Ranked choice ballots   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Utilities?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-collection   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-col...   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences andapplication to vote-collection   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-col...   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferencesandapplication to vote-collection   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences   Adam Tarr
• [EM] I'll try one last time   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: plurality, FPTP and runoff voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM] beatpath tiebreaking (question)   Stephen Turner
• [EM] Meek and Newland-Britton   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Meek and Newland-Britton   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re Meek and Newland-Britton   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Meek and Newland-Britton   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: proper Borda implementation   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-col...   Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Cycles in sincere individual preferences and application to vote-col...   Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Thoughts on electoral college   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] re topic policing   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] IRRV as best popular name for Condorcet voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] IRRV as best popular name for Condorcet voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] affects of IRR(V) and meaning of democracy   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] pairwise as best popular name for Condorcet voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] pairwise as best popular name for Condorcet voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Demo of n-rank ballot for U.S. president   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] pSTV v0.5.2 beta   bql at bolson.org
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Advocacy of Kemeny's method   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Re: seeking 5 candidate Condorcet example   mrouse1 at mrouse.com

Last message date: Thu Sep 30 23:47:01 PDT 2004
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:39 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...