[EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative
kislanko at airmail.net
Thu Sep 2 14:50:36 PDT 2004
Yep. You got it. Kerry's hold on his votes is very tenuous. If he even looks
like he's asking Nader for "help", he's toast.
From: election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com
[mailto:election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 4:47 PM
To: election-methods at electorama.com
Subject: [EM] Re: Kerry-Nader negotiation initiative
Paul Kislanko <kislanko <at> airmail.net> writes:
> If Kerry were even to ACKNOWLEDGE Nader, Bush would win in a landslide
> because most of the reluctant Kerry voters still blame Nader for
Lemme try to follow your logic.
Kerry voters are angry at Nader for causing Bush to be elected.
However, if Nader tries to NOT do the same thing this time around, they are
still so angry about last time, that they will.....what, vote for Bush? Sit
home and not vote, so they can now be angry at themselves for "electing"
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
More information about the Election-Methods