[EM] Re: paradigms...

[Rob Brown]

Paul Kislanko <kislanko <at> airmail.net> writes:

> I find it amazing that the list thinks we should ignore voters' preferences
> when defining an election method.

Well, if you are going to respect all their preferences, even if those 
preferences are contradictory, why not also have ballots that allow the voter 
to specify both A > B as well as B > A ?  Hey, if they feel that way, let them 
say it, don't question whether it makes sense or not.

-rob