[EM] Condorcet incompatibility proofs

[James Green-Armytage]

seppley at alumni.caltech.edu writes:
>I assume James is using the name "consistency" to refer
>to the criterion also called "reinforcement."  

Um, yeah. I meant that if one group of ballots, processed by the given
method, gives A as the winner, and another group of ballots gives A as the
winner too, then if all of the ballots are combined and processed, you
should still get A. Is that "reinforcement"?

my best,
James