November 2008 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Nov 1 00:53:15 PDT 2008
Ending: Sun Nov 30 21:44:02 PST 2008
Messages: 322

• [EM] Auctions   Greg Nisbet
• [EM] Auction-type Iteration   Greg Nisbet
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Auctions   Raph Frank
• [EM] A new simulation   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.   Diego Santos
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Immunity From Majority Complaints now free of Symbol font (was: Re: Who comes "second" in Ranked Pairs?)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans   Michael Rouse
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans   Raph Frank
• [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans   mrouse1 at mrouse.com
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans   Steve Eppley
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Raph Frank
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Chris Benham
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] "Best voting systems" 3-part math paper by Warren D. Smith   Warren Smith
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Greg
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Greg
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Greg
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Bob Richard
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Chris Benham
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Raph Frank
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Chris Benham
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Simple example of FPTP being no monotonic   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Simple example of FPTP being no monotonic   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Chris Benham
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Chris Benham
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)   Chris Benham
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] (no subject)   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] (no subject)   James Gilmour
• [EM] (no subject)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] (no subject)   James Gilmour
• [EM] (no subject)   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] (no subject)   James Gilmour
• [EM] (no subject)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Greg
• [EM] (no subject)   James Gilmour
• [EM] (no subject)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 21   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] (no subject)   James Gilmour
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 21   James Gilmour
• [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV   Raph Frank
• [EM] IRV and PR-STV Re: examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] IRV and PR-STV Re: examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV and PR-STV Re: examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis   Raph Frank
• [EM] IEEE ToIFaS CFP.   Graham Bignell
• [EM] Popular initiatives and dulling the tyranny of the majority   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Comparing Partial Rankings   Stephen Turner
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Popular initiatives and dulling the tyranny of the majority   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries   Raph Frank
• [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries   Brian Olson
• [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Yee diagrams   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Oregon   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Oregon   Michael Rouse
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Oregon   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Wiki on Electorama no longer maintained?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Diego Santos
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Raph Frank
• [EM] name of multi-winner method   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Three rounds   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Three rounds   Raph Frank
• [EM] Wiki on Electorama no longer maintained?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Gerrymandering and competitive districts   Raph Frank
• [EM] Gerrymandering and competitive districts   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Greg
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I Prefer Condorcet] to IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Paper Ballots, User Interface Failures   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 44   Greg Dennis
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Greg
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Greg
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 44   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] polls and manipulation   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Greg
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] polls and manipulation   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   James Gilmour
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   Bob Richard
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cooperation and Entropy in Lotteries   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Greg
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings" question   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   James Gilmour
• [EM] "Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings" question   Raph Frank
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 53   Greg
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Bob Richard
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Greg Dennis
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Cooperation and Entropy in Lotteries   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Michael Poole
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Greg
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Michael Poole
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Ralph Suter
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Greg
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Raph Frank
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] MELLS (was Cooperation and Entropy in Lotteries)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Another Lottery Based on Scores   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Another Lottery Based on Scores(correction)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] The path to election reform, was Re: Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

Last message date: Sun Nov 30 21:44:02 PST 2008
Archived on: Thu Jan 8 17:24:44 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...