November 2008 Archives by date
Starting: Sat Nov 1 00:53:15 PDT 2008
Ending: Sun Nov 30 21:44:02 PST 2008
Messages: 322
- [EM] Auctions
Greg Nisbet
- [EM] Auction-type Iteration
Greg Nisbet
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
Raph Frank
- [EM] Auctions
Raph Frank
- [EM] A new simulation
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.
Diego Santos
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Immunity From Majority Complaints now free of Symbol font (was: Re: Who comes "second" in Ranked Pairs?)
Steve Eppley
- [EM] Methods for Senators, governors, etc.
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans
Michael Rouse
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans
Raph Frank
- [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans
mrouse1 at mrouse.com
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Happy election day, fellow Americans
Steve Eppley
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Steve Eppley
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Raph Frank
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Chris Benham
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] "Best voting systems" 3-part math paper by Warren D. Smith
Warren Smith
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Greg
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Greg
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Greg
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Bob Richard
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Markus Schulze
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Chris Benham
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Raph Frank
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Markus Schulze
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Markus Schulze
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Chris Benham
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonicvoting methods
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Simple example of FPTP being no monotonic
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Simple example of FPTP being no monotonic
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Chris Benham
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Chris Benham
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)
Chris Benham
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Raph Frank
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] (no subject)
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] (no subject)
James Gilmour
- [EM] (no subject)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] (no subject)
James Gilmour
- [EM] (no subject)
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] (no subject)
James Gilmour
- [EM] (no subject)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Greg
- [EM] (no subject)
James Gilmour
- [EM] (no subject)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Some chance for consensus (was: Buying Votes)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad
Stéphane Rouillon
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 21
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] (no subject)
James Gilmour
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 21
James Gilmour
- [EM] New MN court affidavits by those defending non-Monotonic voting methods & IRV/STV
Raph Frank
- [EM] IRV and PR-STV Re: examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] IRV and PR-STV Re: examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] IRV and PR-STV Re: examination of plaintiff's memorandum re IRV in Minneapolis
Raph Frank
- [EM] IEEE ToIFaS CFP.
Graham Bignell
- [EM] Popular initiatives and dulling the tyranny of the majority
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Comparing Partial Rankings
Stephen Turner
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Popular initiatives and dulling the tyranny of the majority
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] New MN court affidavits etc. (correction)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] In defense of the Electoral College (was Re: Making a Bad Thing Worse)
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries
Raph Frank
- [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries
Brian Olson
- [EM] Yee-Bolson Diagrams for Lotteries
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Yee diagrams
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Oregon
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Oregon
Michael Rouse
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Oregon
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Wiki on Electorama no longer maintained?
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Diego Santos
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Raph Frank
- [EM] name of multi-winner method
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Three rounds
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Three rounds
Raph Frank
- [EM] Wiki on Electorama no longer maintained?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Gerrymandering and competitive districts
Raph Frank
- [EM] Gerrymandering and competitive districts
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Greg
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I Prefer Condorcet] to IRV
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Paper Ballots, User Interface Failures
Brian Olson
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 44
Greg Dennis
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Greg
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Greg
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 44
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] polls and manipulation
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Greg
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] polls and manipulation
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
James Gilmour
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
Bob Richard
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Top Two Runoff versus Instant Top To Runoff
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Cooperation and Entropy in Lotteries
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Brian Olson
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Greg
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] "Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings" question
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
James Gilmour
- [EM] "Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings" question
Raph Frank
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 53, Issue 53
Greg
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Bob Richard
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Greg Dennis
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Cooperation and Entropy in Lotteries
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Michael Poole
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Brian Olson
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Greg
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Michael Poole
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Brian Olson
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Ralph Suter
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Greg
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Raph Frank
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] MELLS (was Cooperation and Entropy in Lotteries)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Another Lottery Based on Scores
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] Another Lottery Based on Scores(correction)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] The path to election reform, was Re: Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Last message date:
Sun Nov 30 21:44:02 PST 2008
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:33:52 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).