[EM] (no subject)

[Kathy Dopp]

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:20 AM, James Gilmour
>
> If I have understood the various submissions correctly, the principal objection to IRV on THIS ground, is that the ballot papers of
> voters who express different numbers of preferences are thereby treated differently, and in such a way and to such an extent that
> these differences should render the IRV voting system "unconstitutional".

False. That is not the only concern, but one of several obvious
inequities in the IRV counting method, but I do not have time
currently to continue this discussion on this list.

Kathy