[EM] name of multi-winner method
Jobst Heitzig
heitzig-j at web.de
Sun Nov 16 02:58:06 PST 2008
Hi Kristofer,
> That's just the multiwinner adaptation of IRV.
I don't think so! The point is that the *candidates* provide the ranking
from which the vote transfers are determined. The idea is to keep it
maximally simple for the voters: they still vote for only one candidate.
I now realize that it is also different from STV in an important
respect: there is no transfer of excess votes!
What I want with this method is a maximally simple multi-winner method
that does not rely on lists but is focussed on individual candidates and
that makes sure that all large-enough minorities are represented. It is
not important that it results in proportionality, hence it needs no
transfer of excess votes.
Perhaps this is actually a new method? If so, what would we call it?
Jobst
I don't think it has a
> formal name, but here's how I've defined (naive) multiwinner adaptations
> in my simulations:
>
> Take single-winner method X. Produce a social ordering, then if there
> are k winners to be elected, pick the k highest ranked on the social
> ordering, and elect them.
>
> The social ordering of IRV is opposite of its elimination order: the one
> who's eliminated in the first round is ranked last, and so on.
>
> --
>
> That is, unless "the next candidate on her list" is the next candidate
> on the *candidate*'s list, in which case it would be a sort of
> STV-Asset/Party-list hybrid.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list