December 2008 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Dec 1 00:34:30 PST 2008
Ending: Wed Dec 31 19:14:11 PST 2008
Messages: 327

• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion definition amended   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 54, Issue 4   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Fwd: Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step   Raph Frank
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step   Brian Olson
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step   Raph Frank
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 54, Issue 11   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Single-winner election data from the OpenSTV database   Greg
• [EM] MAM website now in Unicode (was: Immunity From Majority Complaints now free of Symbol font (was: Re: Who comes "second" in Ranked Pairs?))   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Single-winner election data from the OpenSTV database   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Chris Benham
• [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion (newly amended version)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Voting space graphs, varying sigma   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   James Gilmour
• [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 54, Issue 18   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion (newly amended version)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Voting space graphs, varying sigma   Raph Frank
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   James Gilmour
• [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A new simulation   Peter Barath
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Auctions   Peter Barath
• [EM] A new simulation   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Square Vote: an alternative to the Clarke-tax   Peter Barath
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Favoring a frontrunner   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Voting space graphs, varying sigma   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Auctions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A new simulation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Favoring a frontrunner   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV's Squeeze Feature   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Favoring a frontrunner   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] A new simulation   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV's Squeeze Feature   Chris Benham
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative   Greg
• [EM] IRV's Starlike Noncompliance   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A new simulation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] How FairVote IRV propaganda has been very effective.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion (Kristofer)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Square Vote   Peter Barath
• [EM] "Push-over Invulnerability" criterion   Chris Benham
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Comprehensive 3-slot Ratings Winner" suggested 2 criteria   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Fwd: RCV in SF   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Square Vote   Peter Barath
• [EM] Square Vote   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems: the Dirty Little Secret   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Modeling Voters for Discussion and Simulation   Brian Olson
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   James Gilmour
• [EM] FairVote Propaganda: Bucklin Voting.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Some Bucklin Voting history in Cleveland, Ohio.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Bucklin "Momentum" from 1914.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Modeling Voters for Discussion and Simulation   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems: the Dirty Little Secret   Michael Allan
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] MELLS (min expected lack of log satisfaction)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 3   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems: the Dirty Little Secret   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 3   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?   Chris Benham
• [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] R/G/B/Y   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems   Michael Allan
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Aaron Armitage
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems   Michael Allan
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Advanced Voting Systems   Michael Allan
• [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?   Chris Benham
• [EM] GMC compliance a mistaken standard? (was "CDTT criterion"...)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] GMC compliance a mistaken standard? (was "CDTT criterion"...)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Markus Schulze
• [EM] The history of preferential voting in the United States   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org   Jan Kok
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org   Jan Kok
• [EM] MELLS (min expected lack of log satisfaction)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org   Michael Rouse
• [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

Last message date: Wed Dec 31 19:14:11 PST 2008
Archived on: Thu Jan 8 17:24:45 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...